Source: libspring-java
Version: 4.3.22-2
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-Cc: tony mancill
Control: block 925390 924635 924634 by -1
Dear maintainer (and tony, whose upload 4.3.22-2 caused this bug),
your package libspring-java suddenly stopped building two binaries that
were actively used by other p
On Tue, 26 Mar 2019 14:46:35 +0100 Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> Dear maintainer (and tony, whose upload 4.3.22-2 caused this bug),
>
> your package libspring-java suddenly stopped building two binaries that
> were actively used by other packages, like activemq.
>
> What's very worse, the changelog d
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 02:46:35PM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> Source: libspring-java
> Version: 4.3.22-2
> Severity: serious
> X-Debbugs-Cc: tony mancill
> Control: block 925390 924635 924634 by -1
>
> Dear maintainer (and tony, whose upload 4.3.22-2 caused this bug),
>
> your package libspr
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 04:35:41PM -0700, tony mancill wrote:
> Are you sure about the upload of 4.3.22-2 changing the number of binary
> packages built? If that is the case, it was completely unintentional.
Meh, apparently nope, I was tricked by that dpkg change in the Binary
field... I had only
On Wed, 27 Mar 2019 12:01:40 +0100 Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 04:35:41PM -0700, tony mancill wrote:
> > Are you sure about the upload of 4.3.22-2 changing the number of binary
> > packages built? If that is the case, it was completely unintentional.
>
> Meh, apparently nope,
On Tue, 26 Mar 2019 16:35:41 -0700 tony mancill wrote:
> Regarding the OpenHFT, I tried to help the overall situation by
> uploading new versions to experimental several months back but as was
> discussed on the list (I'd have to find the link), was requested to
> hold-off on transitioning them in
On Tue, 26 Mar 2019 15:27:38 +0100 Emmanuel Bourg
wrote:> I think this was done to remove the openhft packages that are
> incompatible with Java 11. But maybe the affected Spring modules could
> be salvaged by disabling the code using openhft (if it's optional).
I’m not entirely sure it is possib
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 12:37:17PM +0100, Andrej Shadura wrote:
> > (srly? Using dh -N instead of removing the packages from d/control?!…).
>
> Yes, so that it’s easier to bring them back when they’re unbroken.
But that doesn't help anything.
You removed two packages because a dependency of the
Le 27/03/2019 à 12:41, Andrej Shadura a écrit :
> I’m not entirely sure it is possible. But maybe someone else is going to
> have better luck removing openhft dependencies.
I'll get a look during the Paris BSP on sunday.
Emmanuel Bourg
__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team