Bug#328741: marked as done (asm: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'dpatch')

2005-09-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 19 Sep 2005 08:44:28 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed in last upload has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibilit

Bug#328929: possible gcc version problem

2005-09-18 Thread Michael Koch
On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 07:53:32AM -0700, Blars Blarson wrote: > gjdoc failed to build on a sparc buildd, but built fine on my sparc > pbuilder. I suspect this may be due to using the latest version of > the gcc related packages in the pbuilder. Strange it fails in my uptodate pbuilder on i386. R

Bug#328929: possible gcc version problem

2005-09-18 Thread Blars Blarson
gjdoc failed to build on a sparc buildd, but built fine on my sparc pbuilder. I suspect this may be due to using the latest version of the gcc related packages in the pbuilder. ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.de

asm_1.5.3-2_powerpc.changes ACCEPTED

2005-09-18 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: asm_1.5.3-2.diff.gz to pool/main/a/asm/asm_1.5.3-2.diff.gz asm_1.5.3-2.dsc to pool/main/a/asm/asm_1.5.3-2.dsc libasm-java-doc_1.5.3-2_all.deb to pool/main/a/asm/libasm-java-doc_1.5.3-2_all.deb libasm-java_1.5.3-2_all.deb to pool/main/a/asm/libasm-java_1.5.3-2_all.deb Announcing t

Processing of asm_1.5.3-2_powerpc.changes

2005-09-18 Thread Archive Administrator
asm_1.5.3-2_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: asm_1.5.3-2.dsc asm_1.5.3-2.diff.gz libasm-java_1.5.3-2_all.deb libasm-java-doc_1.5.3-2_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon ___ pkg-java-mainta

Bug#328929: gjdoc: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'java-gcj-compat-dev'

2005-09-18 Thread Michael Koch
On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 11:13:33AM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote: > Package: gjdoc > Version: 0.7.5-3 > Severity: serious > Tags: patch > > When building 'gjdoc' in a clean 'unstable' chroot, > I get the following error: > > checking whether stripping libraries is possible... yes > You have no CLA

Bug#328929: gjdoc: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'java-gcj-compat-dev'

2005-09-18 Thread Andreas Jochens
Package: gjdoc Version: 0.7.5-3 Severity: serious Tags: patch When building 'gjdoc' in a clean 'unstable' chroot, I get the following error: checking whether stripping libraries is possible... yes You have no CLASSPATH, I hope it is good checking for uudecode... no configure: WARNING: I have to c

Bug#272295: kaffe CVS HEAD successfully compiles rmi class for lucene; passes unit tests

2005-09-18 Thread Jeff Breidenbach
Awesome! --Jeff ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers