Your message dated Thu, 10 May 2007 08:54:18 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line cairo-java: FTBFS: Requested 'glib-java >= 0.4.2' but version
of glib-java is 0.2.5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Hi,
> On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 11:08:42AM +0200, Martijn Kint / True wrote:
>> L.S,
>>
>> Hi guys! I'm having some trouble with a client of mine who insists on
>> that Tomcat 5.0.28 is stable and 5.0.30 isn't. The problem is that I
>> can't install 5.0.28 from Apt as we only have 5.0.30-11 availabl
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> owner 422991 !
Bug#422991: libgnumail-java: New upstream 1.1.2 fixes several bugs
Owner recorded as "Paul Cager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrato
On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 11:08:42AM +0200, Martijn Kint / True wrote:
> L.S,
>
> Hi guys! I'm having some trouble with a client of mine who insists on
> that Tomcat 5.0.28 is stable and 5.0.30 isn't. The problem is that I
> can't install 5.0.28 from Apt as we only have 5.0.30-11 available.
>
> C
Package: libgnumail-java
Severity: normal
From the annoucement:
This is a bug fix and API compatibility fix release. Thanks to Boris
Folgmann for discovering an issue with unique message-ids, and
especially to Arend Freije for his work on API compatibility.
ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/classpathx/ma
L.S,
Hi guys! I'm having some trouble with a client of mine who insists on
that Tomcat 5.0.28 is stable and 5.0.30 isn't. The problem is that I
can't install 5.0.28 from Apt as we only have 5.0.30-11 available.
Could you please provide me with some ammo why you guys chose 5.0.30
instead? May
6 matches
Mail list logo
