Package: hadoop
Version: N/A
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Dear Debian maintainer,
On Friday, March 26, 2010, I notified you of the beginning of a review process
concerning debconf templates for hadoop.
The debian-l10n-english contributors have now reviewed these templates,
and the proposed
Hi,
I would try two things:
1.
Use full path for `embed-url` in your fop.xconf:
font kerning=yes
metrics-url=file:///etc/fop/fonts/times-roman.xml
embed-url=times.ttf
2.
Send the output of `fop -d`. So we can check if your local fonts dir
is properly inspected
Thanks.
--
Mathieu
__
This
Hi!
I'm sorry, but I reject your package, as the Academic Free License version 2.1
is despite its name considered non DFSG-free. See for example
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/10/msg00237.html and
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/10/msg00240.html.
Best regards,
Alexander
On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 12:48:16 +, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
ftpmas...@debian.org wrote:
Hi!
Hi Alexander,
I'm sorry, but I reject your package, as the Academic Free License
version
2.1
is despite its name considered non DFSG-free. See for example
Hi Maintainers of eclipse-platform,
I'm about to do some cleanup of the sat4j package; the most notable change will
be that the jars will move to /usr/share/java as I will use jh_installlibs to
handle this nicely.
I'm not sure whether this affects eclipse or not, but I wanted to let you know
at
Michael Tautschnig wrote:
Hi Maintainers of eclipse-platform,
I'm about to do some cleanup of the sat4j package; the most notable change
will
be that the jars will move to /usr/share/java as I will use jh_installlibs to
handle this nicely.
I'm not sure whether this affects eclipse or
FYI: The status of the gjdoc source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 0.7.9-4.1
Current version: (not in testing)
Hint: Package not in unstable
The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint
Your message dated Tue, 13 Apr 2010 19:47:35 +0200
with message-id 4bc4ae37.3020...@thykier.net
and subject line Re: Bug#491290: liblucene-java: Invalid link for lucene.jar
has caused the Debian Bug report #491290,
regarding liblucene-java: Invalid link for lucene.jar
to be marked as done.
This
Author: drazzib
Date: 2010-04-13 18:20:20 + (Tue, 13 Apr 2010)
New Revision: 12152
Removed:
trunk/mina/debian/libmina-java-doc.doc-base
Modified:
trunk/mina/debian/README.Debian
trunk/mina/debian/changelog
trunk/mina/debian/control
trunk/mina/debian/libmina-java-doc.javadoc
Author: drazzib
Date: 2010-04-13 18:21:02 + (Tue, 13 Apr 2010)
New Revision: 12153
Added:
tags/mina/1.1.7.dfsg-9/
Log:
[svn-buildpackage] Tagging mina (1.1.7.dfsg-9)
___
pkg-java-commits mailing list
pkg-java-comm...@lists.alioth.debian.org
mina_1.1.7.dfsg-9_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
mina_1.1.7.dfsg-9.dsc
mina_1.1.7.dfsg-9.debian.tar.gz
libmina-java_1.1.7.dfsg-9_all.deb
libmina-java-doc_1.1.7.dfsg-9_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host
Author: drazzib
Date: 2010-04-13 18:26:30 + (Tue, 13 Apr 2010)
New Revision: 12154
Removed:
trunk/aspectj/debian/patches/02_use_gjdoc.diff
Modified:
trunk/aspectj/debian/changelog
trunk/aspectj/debian/control
trunk/aspectj/debian/patches/series
trunk/aspectj/debian/rules
Log:
*
Author: drazzib
Date: 2010-04-13 18:27:08 + (Tue, 13 Apr 2010)
New Revision: 12155
Added:
tags/aspectj/1.6.6+dfsg-4/
Log:
[svn-buildpackage] Tagging aspectj (1.6.6+dfsg-4)
___
pkg-java-commits mailing list
aspectj_1.6.6+dfsg-4_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
aspectj_1.6.6+dfsg-4.dsc
aspectj_1.6.6+dfsg-4.debian.tar.gz
aspectj_1.6.6+dfsg-4_all.deb
aspectj-doc_1.6.6+dfsg-4_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
block 432677 with 397817
Bug #432677 [libstylebook-java] libstylebook-java: JPEG encoding is broken
Was not blocked by any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 432677: 397817
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Accepted:
aspectj-doc_1.6.6+dfsg-4_all.deb
to main/a/aspectj/aspectj-doc_1.6.6+dfsg-4_all.deb
aspectj_1.6.6+dfsg-4.debian.tar.gz
to main/a/aspectj/aspectj_1.6.6+dfsg-4.debian.tar.gz
aspectj_1.6.6+dfsg-4.dsc
to main/a/aspectj/aspectj_1.6.6+dfsg-4.dsc
aspectj_1.6.6+dfsg-4_all.deb
to
Package: libsurefire-java
Version: 2.4.3-3
Severity: important
I am working packaging struts2 from source. While doing a test build I faced
problem where maven-surefire-plugin is not detected by mvn-debian.
Following is the debug output.
on...@ibook:~/Desktop/struts-2.1.8/src$ mvn-debian -e -f
Hi Onkar,
Can you give me the versions of maven2 and maven-debian-helper?
Also, have you tried building your package with the maven.mk CDBS
scripts? mvn-debian is not maintained and should be removed.
Ludovic
Onkar Shinde a écrit :
Package: libsurefire-java
Version: 2.4.3-3
Severity:
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 1:05 AM, Ludovic Claude
ludovic.cla...@laposte.net wrote:
Hi Onkar,
Can you give me the versions of maven2 and maven-debian-helper?
maven2 - 2.2.1-2
maven-debian-helper - 0.9
Also, have you tried building your package with the maven.mk CDBS
scripts? mvn-debian is
Hi Onkar,
First, try to get the latest versions of those 2 packages from Debian.
There are also some new versions of related packages, I remember that
there was maven-javadoc-plugin, maven-site-plugin, all doxia packages
and maybe a few others. If you can synchronize them on Ubuntu Lucid,
that
20 matches
Mail list logo
