Re: Problems when building binary package of libcommons-fileupload-java under wheezy

Hi Emmanuel, hi Debian Java Maintainers, On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 09:30:49PM +0100, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: Le 21/12/2013 19:24, Salvatore Bonaccorso a écrit : Thanks, this indeed seems to make it better. I have uploade the resulting preliminary packages to [1]. If you have time in the coming

Processed: eclipse-rcp: eclipse 3.8 hangs on splash screen with Loading Workbench after update from 3.7.2

Processing control commands: severity -1 important Bug #684604 [eclipse-rcp] eclipse-rcp: eclipse 3.8 hangs on splash screen with Loading Workbench after update from 3.7.2 Severity set to 'important' from 'grave' -- 684604: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=684604 Debian Bug

Bug#684604: marked as done (eclipse-rcp: eclipse 3.8 hangs on splash screen with Loading Workbench after update from 3.7.2)

Your message dated Sun, 22 Dec 2013 17:20:08 +0100 with message-id 52b71138.5050...@gambaru.de and subject line Re: Bug#684604: eclipse-rcp: eclipse 3.8 hangs on splash screen with Loading Workbench after update from 3.7.2 has caused the Debian Bug report #684604, regarding eclipse-rcp: eclipse

Bug#732860: fix java archdir for arm64 and ppc64el

Package: javatools Version: 0.45 please fix the archdir for arm64 and ppc64el. patch at http://launchpadlibrarian.net/160387696/javatools_0.43ubuntu2_0.43ubuntu3.diff.gz __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team

Processing of jenkins-json_2.4-jenkins-3-1_i386.changes

jenkins-json_2.4-jenkins-3-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: jenkins-json_2.4-jenkins-3-1.dsc jenkins-json_2.4-jenkins-3.orig.tar.gz jenkins-json_2.4-jenkins-3-1.debian.tar.gz libjenkins-json-java_2.4-jenkins-3-1_all.deb

bridge-method-injector_1.8-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2013 20:34:09 + Source: bridge-method-injector Binary: libbridge-method-injector-java libbridge-method-injector-java-doc Architecture: source all Version: 1.8-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium

jenkins-json_2.4-jenkins-3-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2013 20:37:36 + Source: jenkins-json Binary: libjenkins-json-java libjenkins-json-java-doc Architecture: source all Version: 2.4-jenkins-3-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian

Bug#692625: marked as done (non-free files in upstream tarball (The Software shall be used for Good, not Evil))

Your message dated Sun, 22 Dec 2013 21:22:04 + with message-id e1vuqtm-wp...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#692625: fixed in jenkins-json 2.4-jenkins-3-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #692625, regarding non-free files in upstream tarball (The Software shall be used for Good,

Processing of jenkins-trilead-ssh2_217-jenkins-3-1_i386.changes

jenkins-trilead-ssh2_217-jenkins-3-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: jenkins-trilead-ssh2_217-jenkins-3-1.dsc jenkins-trilead-ssh2_217-jenkins-3.orig.tar.gz jenkins-trilead-ssh2_217-jenkins-3-1.debian.tar.gz

jenkins-trilead-ssh2_217-jenkins-3-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2013 20:43:17 + Source: jenkins-trilead-ssh2 Binary: libjenkins-trilead-ssh2-java libjenkins-trilead-ssh2-java-doc Architecture: source all Version: 217-jenkins-3-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low

Bug#732238: cglib: Please package 3.0 release

On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 07:55:06PM -0300, Miguel Landaeta wrote: On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 11:34:25PM +0100, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: This is unlikely to be a simple upgrade. cglib 3 switched to asm 4 and there are many incompatibilities according to clirr: The advisable thing would be to

Bug#732959: eclipse 3.8 is ancient. 4.3.1 is the most recent version available @ eclipse.org

Package: eclipse Version: 3.8.1-4 Severity: important Dear Eclipse Maintainers and to whom it may concern, is it too much to ask that the eclipse packages be kept up to date, or am I being a complete jerk and overlooking something obvious which is totally possible. Thanks in advance. --Crowbar