eclipse-wtp is marked for autoremoval from testing

2015-06-29 Thread Debian testing autoremoval watch
eclipse-wtp 3.6.0-1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2015-07-01 It is affected by these RC bugs: 787552: eclipse-wtp: [eclipse-wtp][FTBFS][LICENSE Problem] Multiple distribution problem __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team

Bug#790409: eclipse-pydev: pydev is not recognized by eclipse anymore

2015-06-29 Thread Markus Koschany
Am 29.06.2015 um 21:24 schrieb Jakub Adam: [...] > If there is something blocking the bnd upload, please let me know. > Hi Jakub, bnd1.50 is currently in NEW. It might take a few weeks until it gets processed by the ftp team. The plan is to switch all broken reverse-dependencies of bnd to bnd1.5

Bug#790409: eclipse-pydev: pydev is not recognized by eclipse anymore

2015-06-29 Thread Jakub Adam
Hi Markus, On Mon, 29 Jun 2015 19:17:19 +0200 Markus Koschany wrote: > I saw that Jakub Adam already changed the build-dependencies and dependencies > in eclipse-pydev but I don't know what else is required to fix this > issue. If someone else does, please let us know. Some of the new dependenci

Processed: Re: Bug#790409: eclipse-pydev: pydev is not recognized by eclipse anymore

2015-06-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed Bug #790409 [eclipse-pydev] eclipse-pydev: pydev is not recognized by eclipse anymore Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 790409: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=790409 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problem

Bug#790409: eclipse-pydev: pydev is not recognized by eclipse anymore

2015-06-29 Thread Markus Koschany
Control: tags -1 confirmed Am 29.06.2015 um 10:42 schrieb Rogério Brito: > Package: eclipse-pydev > Version: 3.9.2-2 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > > Hi. > > Unfortunately, pydev has stopped being recognized by eclipse for quite some > time (I think that since the

mavibot_1.0.0~M1-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable, unstable

2015-06-29 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 08:44:28 +0200 Source: mavibot Binary: libmavibot-java Architecture: source all Version: 1.0.0~M1-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers Changed-By: Emmanuel Bourg

netbeans_8.0.2+dfsg1-3_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2015-06-29 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 15:57:00 +0200 Source: netbeans Binary: libnb-absolutelayout-java libnb-apisupport3-java libnb-ide14-java libnb-java5-java netbeans Architecture: source all Version: 8.0.2+dfsg1-3 Distribution: unstabl

Processing of netbeans_8.0.2+dfsg1-3_amd64.changes

2015-06-29 Thread Debian FTP Masters
netbeans_8.0.2+dfsg1-3_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: netbeans_8.0.2+dfsg1-3.dsc netbeans_8.0.2+dfsg1-3.debian.tar.xz libnb-absolutelayout-java_8.0.2+dfsg1-3_all.deb libnb-apisupport3-java_8.0.2+dfsg1-3_all.deb libnb-ide14-java_8.0.2+dfsg1-3_all.deb

Processing of netbeans_8.0.2+dfsg1-3_amd64.changes

2015-06-29 Thread Debian FTP Masters
netbeans_8.0.2+dfsg1-3_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org along with the files: netbeans_8.0.2+dfsg1-3.dsc netbeans_8.0.2+dfsg1-3.debian.tar.xz libnb-absolutelayout-java_8.0.2+dfsg1-3_all.deb libnb-apisupport3-java_8.0.2+dfsg1-3_all.deb libnb-ide14-java_8.0.2+df

Bug#653132: netbeans: Profiler not included in package

2015-06-29 Thread Markus Koschany
On Sat, 20 Jun 2015 15:25:24 +0200 Markus Koschany wrote: [...] > I agree with the bug submitter that it would be nice to include the > profiler module but I would call it a feature request for Debian's > Netbeans package. I have pushed a new branch "profiler". It includes a netbeans-profiler.pat

Bug#580856: Probably, use libjson-simple-java instead of non-free json?

2015-06-29 Thread Jayson Willson
No, I am not interested in it at all. I was just studying about Debian licenses and those considered non-free and came across this package. I have checked popcon for this package's popularity - seems like nobody needs it. They may go away. __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team

Bug#580856: Probably, use libjson-simple-java instead of non-free json?

2015-06-29 Thread Markus Koschany
Am 28.06.2015 um 20:15 schrieb Jayson Willson: > Hello. What is the situation about this bug now? Seems like jabsorb is > unmaintained since 2012. Probably, it is possible to replace non-free > json with libjson-simple-java implementation, which is in "main"? > Hello, I have downloaded the lates

liboro-java_2.0.8a-11_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2015-06-29 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 13:55:44 +0200 Source: liboro-java Binary: liboro-java liboro-java-doc Architecture: source all Version: 2.0.8a-11 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers Changed-By:

Processing of liboro-java_2.0.8a-11_amd64.changes

2015-06-29 Thread Debian FTP Masters
liboro-java_2.0.8a-11_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: liboro-java_2.0.8a-11.dsc liboro-java_2.0.8a-11.debian.tar.xz liboro-java-doc_2.0.8a-11_all.deb liboro-java_2.0.8a-11_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.de

Bug#790409: eclipse-pydev: pydev is not recognized by eclipse anymore

2015-06-29 Thread Rogério Brito
Package: eclipse-pydev Version: 3.9.2-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi. Unfortunately, pydev has stopped being recognized by eclipse for quite some time (I think that since the time of the release of jessie). At least 3 of my systems have pydev installed and they don'

Bug#780383: libopensaml2-java: CVE-2015-1796

2015-06-29 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
On Sat, May 09, 2015 at 08:35:13AM -0700, tony mancill wrote: > On 05/06/2015 10:54 PM, tony mancill wrote: > > An update on this... I'm in the midst of packaging 2.6.5, but it in > > turn requires an update to libxmltooling-java to version 1.4.4, which I > > am working on now. > > In an email ex