Your message dated Sat, 21 May 2016 22:23:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#824045: fixed in groovycsv 1.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #824045,
regarding groovycsv: FTBFS: No cached version of
org.codehaus.groovy:groovy-all:1.7.3 available
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 21 May 2016 23:24:04 +0200
Source: groovycsv
Binary: libgroovycsv-java
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.0-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers
groovycsv_1.0-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
groovycsv_1.0-2.dsc
groovycsv_1.0-2.debian.tar.xz
libgroovycsv-java_1.0-2_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
__
This is the maintainer address of
Your message dated Sat, 21 May 2016 23:15:03 +0200
with message-id <8dbe6086-e6e6-875f-6205-a09704a4a...@apache.org>
and subject line Re: groovy should not release with stretch
has caused the Debian Bug report #793911,
regarding groovy2 should not release with stretch
to be marked as done.
This
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:
groovy2 |2.4.5-1 | source, all
groovy2-doc |2.4.5-1 | all
--- Reason ---
ROM; No longer used, replaced by groovy (>= 2)
Your message dated Sat, 21 May 2016 17:09:14 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#824851: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #802716,
regarding libjetty-extra-java: Jasper symlinks are broken after switch to
tomcat7
to be
Your message dated Sat, 21 May 2016 17:09:14 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#824851: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #801009,
regarding jetty: depends on obsolete libservlet2.5-java library
to be marked as done.
Your message dated Sat, 21 May 2016 17:09:14 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#824851: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #587545,
regarding FTBFS [hppa]: java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Cannot create additional
threads
to
Your message dated Sat, 21 May 2016 17:09:14 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#824851: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #589315,
regarding please split jetty-client into a separate package
to be marked as done.
This
Your message dated Sat, 21 May 2016 17:09:14 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#824851: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #759642,
regarding jetty: Please replace dependencies on tomcat7 with tomcat8
to be marked as
Your message dated Sat, 21 May 2016 17:09:14 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#824851: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #787940,
regarding jetty: When jetty8 is installed purging jetty raises an error.
to be marked as
Your message dated Sat, 21 May 2016 17:09:14 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#824851: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #781880,
regarding jetty: Broken homepage
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Sat, 21 May 2016 17:09:14 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#824851: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #587459,
regarding jetty: Does not support multiple Server instances
to be marked as done.
This
Version: 6.1.26-5+rm
Dear submitter,
as the package jetty has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.
For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/824851
The
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:
jetty | 6.1.26-5 | source
libjetty-extra | 6.1.26-5 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, kfreebsd-amd64,
kfreebsd-i386, mips, mips64el, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x
Control: tags -1 -moreinfo +pending
On Fri, 2015-09-11 at 18:01 -0300, Miguel Landaeta wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 06:56:38PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> >
> > Moving the rdeps to groovy2 seems the better fix to me (#793911).
>
> I agree on that and I believe debian-java is working
Your message dated Sat, 21 May 2016 13:17:30 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#793397: fixed in groovy 1.8.6-1+deb7u1
has caused the Debian Bug report #793397,
regarding Remote execution of untrusted code, DoS (CVE-2015-3253)
to be marked as done.
Your message dated Sat, 21 May 2016 13:17:08 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#793397: fixed in groovy 1.8.6-4+deb8u1
has caused the Debian Bug report #793397,
regarding Remote execution of untrusted code, DoS (CVE-2015-3253)
to be marked as done.
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2015 19:59:19 -0300
Source: groovy
Binary: groovy groovy-doc
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.8.6-1+deb7u1
Distribution: oldstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2015 18:27:24 -0300
Source: groovy
Binary: groovy groovy-doc
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.8.6-4+deb8u1
Distribution: stable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers
20 matches
Mail list logo