Bug#526489: Re: Bug#526489: Time to orphan eclipse? (Bug#526489: eclipse: should this package be orphaned?)

2009-06-15 Thread Andrew Overholt
* Markus Knauer mkna...@innoopract.com [2009-06-15 06:21]: Or did you contact one of the persons of the Linux Distro Project? Maybe they have some resources they can spend on that? Unfortunately, we do not (and we're now known as the Linux Tools Project :) . However, we are working on making

Re: [ECLIPSE] Do we need an eclipse-specific policy?

2008-12-17 Thread Andrew Overholt
* Andreas Tille til...@rki.de [2008-12-17 05:42]: On Wed, 17 Dec 2008, Pantelis Koukousoulas wrote: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/EclipsePlugins If a debian eclipse policy is needed, what should it contain? Without having had a look at it (because of time constraints): I would

Re: icu4j_3.8.1-1_i386.changes is NEW

2008-12-16 Thread Andrew Overholt
* Andreas Tille til...@rki.de [2008-12-16 05:32]: On Tue, 16 Dec 2008, Pantelis Koukousoulas wrote: So we should find out the latest version number of icu4j that would be usable for Eclipse. I rewrote the watch file to detect any new version even if a major version change happened (which was

Bug#432541: eclipse-cdt FTBFS

2007-09-12 Thread Andrew Overholt
Hi, * Thomas Girard [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-09-11 16:01]: cd source-tree/org.eclipse.cdt.releng \ /usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj/bin/java -cp /usr/lib/eclipse/startup.jar \ -Dosgi.sharedConfiguration.area=/usr/lib/eclipse/configuration \ Try running the launcher directly: