Hi,
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 10:02:43PM -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 3:31 PM, David Prévot wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 10:55:38AM -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> >
> >> i worked on packaging the upstream version 2.8.1 today
> >> bu
Control: retitle -1 Please upgrade lwjgl to a more recent version
Hi Michael,
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 10:55:38AM -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> i worked on packaging the upstream version 2.8.1 today
It looks like you forgot to push your work in progress to the package
repository, can you pleas
Package: libjssc-java
Version: 2.6.0-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: upstream patch
Control: block 433270 by -1
Hi,
The processing package (#433270) depends on a patched version of
libjssc-java, it would be nice if libjssc-java in Debian could be an
early adopter of this patch.
https://github.com/goh
Package: eclipse-jdt
Version: 3.8.1-4
Severity: wishlist
Control: blocks 433270 by -1
Hi,
The processing source (#433270) embeds a convenient copy of jdi.jar and
jdimodel.jar for its build process. In order to properly build-depend on
eclipse-jdt for the Debian package, it would be nice not to ha
Control: owner -1 !
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 11:57:18PM +0900, Changwoo Ryu wrote:
> Any progress?
That’s been a long time without action, so let me try to take over this
ITP. I just joined pkg-java-maintainers@l.a.d.o and debian-java@l.d.o,
hopefully we’ll be able to push it further this time (ex
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
Le 03/01/2014 11:34, tony mancill a écrit :
> On 01/02/2014 08:46 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
>> On 02-Jan-2014, David Prévot wrote:
>>> Calling closure-compiler inside pbuilder or sbuild (e.g. from d/rules)
>>> fails with
Package: libclosure-compiler-java
Version: 20130227+dfsg1-4
Severity: normal
Control: block 733880 by -1
Hi,
Thanks Tony for uploading a package fixing #705565.
Calling closure-compiler inside pbuilder or sbuild (e.g. from d/rules)
fails with:
run-detectors: unable to find an interprete
Package: libclosure-compiler-java
Version: 20130227+dfsg1-1
Severity: normal
Hi,
I’d be happy to use the closure-compiler as a build-dependency for the
ongoing fullcalendar package, so thanks for packaging it!
Unfortunately, the packaged version fails to load:
$ java -jar /usr/share/java/closur
Hi,
Thanks Niels and Tony for your reviews and advices!
Le 15/01/2013 11:38, tony mancill a écrit :
> On 01/14/2013 11:48 PM, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> Seems to me your patch will prevent anyone from using java-package on
>> the older Java7 binaries.
Right, I didn't thought it would worth the tro
-0.50+nmu2/debian/changelog 2013-01-14 19:31:25.0 -0400
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+java-package (0.50+nmu2) unstable; urgency=high
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Java 7 updates now get two digits. Closes: #698108
+ * Update documentation accordingly.
+
+ -- David Prévot Mon, 14 Jan 2013 19:3
package-0.50/debian/changelog 2012-02-19 14:13:36.0 -0400
+++ java-package-0.50+nmu1/debian/changelog 2012-09-06 18:38:09.0 -0400
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+java-package (0.50+nmu1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Drop installation debconf note. Closes: #685082
+
+ --
0 -0400
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+java-package (0.50+nmu1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Drop installation debconf note. Closes: #685082
+
+ -- David Prévot Thu, 06 Sep 2012 18:38:03 -0400
+
java-package (0.50) unstable; urgency=low
* Java-package reset for reintroduction in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Control: reopen -1
Control: severity serious
Control: tags -1 wheezy sid
Justification: Policy 3.9.1
Hi,
Le 19/08/2012 09:47, Cédric Pineau a écrit :
> Version: 0.51~exp1
> Distribution: experimental
>* Drop installation debconf note (Closes:
Package: java-package
Version: 0.50
Severity: normal
Tags: l10n
Hi,
Please, drop the useless debconf note that duplicates information
already available in the package description, break the installation
workflow (because it needs the user to acknowledge the note), and is not
even translatable whi
14 matches
Mail list logo
