Steffen Moeller wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I know I should make this a RFP, but I am a bit lost
> about what the perfect package name would
> possibly be.
>
> A program that I am interested to package comes
> with the jimi.jar. Is there a way to have this
> Java Image I/O Debianised?
>
> Many thanks an
Onkar Shinde wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 4:48 PM, Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Done,
>>
>> Welcome to the club ;-)
>
> Thanks. I have one question. I couldn't find instructions about
> checking out svn anywhere. Please excuse me if I missed anything
> obvious.
>
>
> Onkar
>
package: maven2
owner: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
thanks
Hi Alexander,
Thanks for your report. I'll investigate further later this week.
Cheers,
Paul
___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.deb
tags 481571 +confirmed
Thanks for the report. Yes, we need to add an explicit manifest.
Upstream's looks like:
Main-Class: org.w3c.tidy.Tidy
Name: org/w3c/tidy/Tidy.class
Java-Bean: True
Thanks,
Paul
___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-
John Davos wrote:
> Good Day All,
>
> I installed tomcat5.5.26-1on testing and unstable and the startup script
> (/etc/init.d/tomcat5.5) doesn't start tomcat and exits without output in the
> log or at console. I started with a fresh install of debian testing
> I know this method of starting tomca
p;atid=120024&aid=1938953&group_id=20024
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: build.xml
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority:
Michael Koch wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 10:33:32PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>> Package: cdk
>> Version: 1:1.0.2-1
>> Severity: serious
>> User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080407 qa-ftbfs
>> Justification: FTBFS on i386
>>
...
> This broken with the last javacc update. Teh N
It looks as though libcommons-cli-java needs to build-depend on
ant-optional.
I was surprised it didn't fail with pbuilder - does pbuilder still
install "Recommends:"?
I'll prepare a fix.
___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@l
Michael Koch wrote:
> If we can't work around this we will need to upload a commons-cli-1.0
> package just for maven2. Would not be nice but a workaround.
Hi Michael,
It's good to have that option as a backup.
Currently commons-cli 1.1 silently discards all but the first instance
of any option
Thank you for your bug report, and I agree that it should be
severity=important. I'd prefer lenny to go out without Maven rather than
with this bug.
This problem (and http://bugs.debian.org/458895) happen because Debian's
version of Maven uses version 1.1 of Apache's commons-cli library, whereas
u
Paul Cager wrote:
> Mike Paul wrote:
>> Package: maven2
>> Version: 2.0.8-3
>> Followup-For: Bug #458895
>
> [...]
>
>> It turns out that /usr/share/maven2/lib/commons-cli.jar is
>> the one that makes the difference: if I copy that jar into a
Mike Paul wrote:
> Package: maven2
> Version: 2.0.8-3
> Followup-For: Bug #458895
[...]
>It turns out that /usr/share/maven2/lib/commons-cli.jar is
> the one that makes the difference: if I copy that jar into a
> freshly-unpacked copy of Apache's Maven distribution, the problem
> occurs there to
Valliet Emmanuel wrote:
> Package: maven2
> Version: 2.0.8-3
> Severity: normal
>
>
> Hi,
> I installed the maven2 debian package, and tried to make an empty j2ee
> package using the artifacts, and it failed:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/devel/java/sources$ mvn -e archetype:create
> -DgroupId=org.h
On Sat, December 22, 2007 21:03, Marcus Better wrote:
> Paul Cager wrote:
>> E.g. the POM could require JUnit-3.8.1 but Debian has packaged version
>> 3.8.2. In this case we would set up a link in the temporary Maven
>> repository:
>>
>> debian/.m2/repository/
On Wed, December 19, 2007 17:52, Dalibor Topic wrote:
> Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
>> Many thanks for the clarifications.
>>
>> So if we are talking about refactoring /usr/share/java, let's do it in
>> some sort of Debian way. We'll write a wrapper around different build
>> system to let them understand
Dalibor Topic wrote:
> Paul Cager wrote:
>> Marcus Better wrote:
>>> Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
>>>
>>>> What about a maven plugin that leave the jar in /usr/share/java, but
>>>> "register" the jar.
>>>>
>>>> if mvn
Marcus Better wrote:
> Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
>
>> What about a maven plugin that leave the jar in /usr/share/java, but
>> "register" the jar.
>>
>> if mvn present:
>> mvn install -DgroupId=... -DversionId=... -DartifactId=...
>> /usr/share/java/my.jar
>
> If it's meant to be run in postinst the
On Mon, December 3, 2007 01:48, Amelia A Lewis wrote:
[. . .]
> Note that the first
> attempt to invoke eclipse:eclipse used this command line (as advised
> in hudson build notes):
>
> mvn -o -DdownloadSources=true eclipse:eclipse
>
> Yes, they advise offline mode. It appears that this may create
Package: libplexus-utils
Severity: wishlist
The new upstream release of Maven2 requires a more up-to-date version of
libplexus-utils.
Current Debian Version: 1:1.4.1-1
Current Upstream: plexus-utils-1.4.8
___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-jav
Amelia A Lewis wrote:
>> I'm not sure that I understand the problem correctly. Debian has
>> packaged Maven, but not any of its plugins - so the plugins should be
>> downloaded normally (i.e. in the same way as a non-Debian Maven
>> installation). Is this not the case?
>
> Doesn't seem to work, fo
Amelia A Lewis wrote:
> Package: maven2
> Version: 2.0.7-2
> Severity: normal
>
> Command and results:
>
> (ydhegar)amyzing:/pub/projects/hudson/hudson$ mvn -e -DdownloadSources=true
> eclipse:eclipse
> + Error stacktraces are turned on.
>
> [ SNIPPED: project information (it's for hudson, if yo
Package: maven2
Version: 2.0.7-2
Severity: wishlist
2.0.8 was released on 27-Nov-07
___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Tiago Saboga wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I have finished the packaging of omegat [1] and libhtmlparser-java [2]
> and I think it would be better to join the java packaging team. What's
> the way to go? Should I just upload to mentors and ask here for a
> sponsor?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Tiago Saboga.
>
> [1] - ht
Paul Cager wrote:
> Rene Engelhard wrote:
>> Gar. Double typo...
>>
>> - Forwarded message from Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
...
>> When removing the generated files, re-building the parser and trying the
>> build it fails, though (not
Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Gar. Double typo...
>
> - Forwarded message from Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
>
> Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2007 17:28:34 +0100
> From: Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: javacc help needed
> Organization: The De
tags 449188 +confirmed
thanks
Thanks for the report. org/apache/maven/wagon/providers/ssh/knownhost/
is present in upstream's wagon-ssh-common-1.0-beta-2.jar but not in
Debian's. I'll fix it and check for other missing packages.
Thanks,
Paul
___
pkg-
tags 445006 +pending
thanks
The fix I previously suggested for this bug would not work with
java-gcj, due to the different ways the Java packages are set up in the
alternatives system. E.g.
/usr/bin/java -> /etc/alternatives/java ->
/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.5.0-sun/jre/bin/java
/usr/bin/java -> /
Michael Koch wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 06:37:55PM +0200, Krzysztof Sobolewski wrote:
>> Package: maven2
>> Version: 2.0.7-1
>> Severity: normal
>>
>> I have two Java packages installed: sun-java5-jre and sun-java6-jre.
>> The latter is selected as /usr/bin/java by update-java-alternatives.
>
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 21/08/07 at 22:24 +0100, Paul Cager wrote:
>> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.6
>> tags 432540 + pending
>> tags 305325 + pending
>> tags 433350 + pending
>> tags 434316 + pending
>
> Hi,
>
>
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Package: wagon
> version: 1.0-beta-2-1
> Severity: serious
> User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070905 qa-ftbfs
> Justification: FTBFS on i386
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
> [...]
> The full build lo
Using locations:
/usr/share/checkstyle/dtd
/usr/share/checkstyle/xsl
seems to fit in with what other packages do.
Unless anyone can think of better locations, that's what I'll implement.
Thanks,
Paul
___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-j
Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> Hi Maintainer,
>
> rejected, i cant find the license info in the tarball. The only thing i
> find is one file that contains Apache 1.1, nothing else, and that was a
> file from the testsuite.
>
> Please talk with upstream to enhance this and then reupload. Thanks.
Woops -
Woops - meant to send this to the list...
Original Message
Subject: Re: [pkg-java] r3873 - in trunk/maven2/debian: . patches
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 20:23:25 +0100
From: Paul Cager <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Trygve Laugstøl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROT
Package: checkstyle
Severity: wishlist
Release 4.3
Fixed Bugs:
* The StrictDuplicateCode check didn't report correct results when multiple
duplicate code regions were overlapping. (bug 1564465)
* Fixed NPE in FallThrough check (bug 1472228)
* Fixed typo in Command Line example (bu
Michael Koch wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 12:08:49PM +, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>> BUILD FAILED
>> /build/user/checkstyle-4.1+dfsg/build.xml:220: Javadoc returned 5
>>at org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.Javadoc.execute (Javadoc.java:2077)
>>at org.apache.tools.ant.UnknownElement.execute
Hi Eric,
Can I just check that you intended to "donate" libjcalendar-java to the
pkg-java team? It's in the svn but never made it into an upload.
If that's OK then I will merge Torsten's NMU into svn and produce a new
upload to record the pkg-java maintainer.
Thanks,
Paul
__
Jason van Zyl wrote:
> It's all ASL licensed if not marked as such.
>
> On 2 Jul 07, at 8:06 AM 2 Jul 07, Paul Cager wrote:
>
>> On Sat, June 16, 2007 11:27 am, Paul Cager wrote:
>>> Hi Jason,
>>>
>>> I'm intending to package plexus-velocit
On Mon, July 2, 2007 3:59 pm, Paul Cager wrote:
> On Tue, June 19, 2007 1:02 am, Paul Cager wrote:
>> I'm intending to package Doxia for the Debian distribution,
>> but noticed that some source files do not have any copyright or license
>> information within them.
On Sat, June 16, 2007 11:27 am, Paul Cager wrote:
> Hi Jason,
>
> I'm intending to package plexus-velocity for the Debian distribution,
> but noticed that the source files do not have any license information
> within them.
>
> Would it be possible to fix it? Can I h
On Tue, June 19, 2007 1:02 am, Paul Cager wrote:
> Hi Jason,
>
> Sorry to bother you again, but you are also listed as the Project Lead
> for Doxia.
>
> I'm intending to package Doxia for the Debian distribution,
> but noticed that some source files do not hav
Hi Jason,
Sorry to bother you again, but you are also listed as the Project Lead
for Doxia.
I'm intending to package Doxia for the Debian distribution,
but noticed that some source files do not have any copyright or license
information within them.
Would it be possible to fix this? As before I'
Hi Jason,
I'm intending to package plexus-velocity for the Debian distribution,
but noticed that the source files do not have any license information
within them.
Would it be possible to fix it? Can I help in any way?
Thanks,
Paul
___
pkg-java-maintai
Christian Perrier wrote:
>>> Description : Plexus internationalisation package.
>>>
>>> Required for maven2 packaging
>> Shouldn't this be named plexus-l10n instad? Most of the time «-i18n» is
>> the wrong names for those packages that are actually localization ones,
>> which include translat
Hi Trygve,
Is your maven-ant-helper ready to be uploaded to the new queue now? If
so would you like me to ask Michael if he's available to look at it?
Thanks,
paul
___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http:
On Wed, June 6, 2007 1:36 pm, Trygve Laugstøl wrote:
>> -maven2 (2.0.6-1) unstable; urgency=low
>> +maven2 (2.0.6-0.1) unstable; urgency=low
>
> Why "0.1" and not "1" as the other packages are using?
Just a reminder (to myself as much as anyone else) that it is definitely,
absolutely, postively no
tags 389887 + moreinfo
thanks
Regarding your Debian bug report:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=389887
I am not sure if I understand the problem you are reporting. If you want
to include a Jar on your classpath you must user the filename of the Jar
itself, not just the owning dir
On Wed, May 30, 2007 8:19 am, Trygve Laugstøl wrote:
> Paul Cager wrote:
>> Paul Cager wrote:
>>> On Mon, May 28, 2007 10:59 am, Trygve Laugstøl wrote:
>>>> Paul Cager wrote:
>>>>> By the way, I've hit a few problems with maven-ant-helper.
Paul Cager wrote:
> On Mon, May 28, 2007 10:59 am, Trygve Laugstøl wrote:
>> Paul Cager wrote:
>>> By the way, I've hit a few problems with maven-ant-helper. Do you mind
>>> if I commit a few changes?
>> Sure, go ahead. We're a team after all :) Just m
On Mon, May 28, 2007 10:59 am, Trygve Laugstøl wrote:
> Paul Cager wrote:
>> Trygve Laugstøl wrote:
>>> Trygve Laugstøl wrote:
>>>> Numbers of errors with the correct plexus-container-default
>>>> (1.0-alpha-9-stable-1) is now 14 and they are all related t
Trygve Laugstøl wrote:
> Trygve Laugstøl wrote:
>> Numbers of errors with the correct plexus-container-default
>> (1.0-alpha-9-stable-1) is now 14 and they are all related to Doxia or
>> plexus component factories.
Do you have an updated package for modello (in particular one that
builds the gener
I've created a maven2/debian directory in the project's svn. Of course
we are far from being able to compile it, let alone upload a package.
But at least it should gives us something to aim for.
Number of build errors is currently hovering around 50. Watch this space...
__
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Paul Cager <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: commons-openpgp
Version : svn 533437
Upstream Author : Brett Porter, Stefan Bodewig
* URL : http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/sandbox/openpgp/index.html
* License : Apa
This happens because the default URL for the help file is "/index.html"
(in default.properties). This will obviously not work.
I'll attempt to improve the situation when I package the new upstream
version (2.6).
___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pk
I found it quite difficult to locate this information on javassh.org's
web site.
The command line required is of the form:
java -jar jta26.jar -plugins Status,Socket,SSH,Terminal hostname 22
(or you can use an equivalent config file).
I'll update the package's description and README when I next
EspeonEefi wrote:
> reopen 353586
> severity 353586 minor
> thanks
>
> I can reproduce this error using the attached very simple build.xml and
> HelloWorld java program. Indeed, ant by default still automatically
> adds /usr/share/ant/lib/ant-bootstrap.jar to the classpath. Note, though
> that the
Michael Koch wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 01:35:12AM +0000, Paul Cager wrote:
>> Currently:
>>
>> Depends: java-gcj-compat | java-virtual-machine, java-gcj-compat |
>>java1-runtime | java2-runtime, libxerces2-java
>> Recommends: ant-optional, jikes | java
Currently:
Depends: java-gcj-compat | java-virtual-machine, java-gcj-compat |
java1-runtime | java2-runtime, libxerces2-java
Recommends: ant-optional, jikes | java-compiler
Should ant Depend or Suggest the compiler packages? I'd say Depend, but
I suppose its not an absolute dependency - you co
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: imagefilters-java
Version : 2.0.235
Upstream Author : Jerry Huxtable
* URL : http://www.jhlabs.com/ip/filters/index.html
* License : Apache 2.0
Programming Lang: Java
Description : manipulation and filteri
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: jtb
Version : 1.3.2
Upstream Author : Wanjun Wang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and others
* URL : http://compilers.cs.ucla.edu/jtb/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: Java
Description : a syntax tree builder for Jav
Hi,
In CVS, bootstrap/javacc.jar has all of the old COM.sun.labs classes
within it (instead of the org.javacc ones). This causes a slight problem
with the packaging of JavaCC I am doing for Debian, as the Sun classes
do not have a "free" license.
How would people feel if I were to replace CVS's b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I have imported the "tagsoup" package into svn. I had created this
package before I became a member of pkg-java, so the version on
packages.debian.org still has me as the maintainer. I've _not_ prepared
a new upload just to fix this, but I have edited
The authors of JavaCC have now re-licensed the JavaCC code under a pure
BSD license (http://www.opensource.org/licenses/bsd-license.html). This
should clear up the doubts some organisations have had regarding the
"Nuclear" and "Weapons" clauses in the original license, and the export
restrictions i
1 Dec 2006 17:42:28 -0600
From: Tom Marble <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Paul Cager <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: Simon Phipps <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Paul:
I'm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I've had a look at the new upstream release (4.0), and it's still not
clear if it is DFSG compliant.
The website[1] explicitly states that the license is "Berkeley Software
Distribution (BSD) License".
In an answer to a query the author (Sreenivas Vi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Please can I apply to join the Java Packaging Project. I've opened an
account on alioth ("paulcager-guest"), and I'm subscribed to
pkg-java-maintainers.
A little about myself, by way of introduction...
I work as a Java developer for a big UK ban
As I'm interested in BCEL I thought I would do a little further
investigation of this problem.
Of the 3 URLS given above,
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=62631
is the most useful - it identifies the failing line of code in BCEL. The
following URL gives the change made by the BCEL aut
66 matches
Mail list logo