Is anyone working on this issue?
It's preventing the build of many packages on armhf and by extension
their transitions.
Kind Regards,
Bas
--
GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1
__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java
On 02/02/2017 07:09 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 02/02/2017 07:44 AM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> On 02/01/2017 10:08 AM, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
>>> On 2017-02-01 09:35, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
>>>> Including the JOSM developers (josm-...@openstreetmap.org)
On 02/02/2017 07:44 AM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> Control: tags -1 pending
>
> On 02/01/2017 10:08 AM, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
>> On 2017-02-01 09:35, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
>>> Including the JOSM developers (josm-...@openstreetmap.org) is also a
>>> good
Control: tags -1 pending
On 02/01/2017 10:08 AM, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
> On 2017-02-01 09:35, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
>> Including the JOSM developers (josm-...@openstreetmap.org) is also a
>> good idea, they (and Vincent Privat in particular) have contributed
>> patches to svgSalamander recently.
>
On 08/25/16 20:02, Markus Koschany wrote:
I think the issue is not unrelated to protobuf 3.0.0. Yesterday I filed
https://bugs.debian.org/835358 because protobuf used a wrong pom.xml
file which provides important information like groupids or artifactids.
So this bug got resolved today but now I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 18-10-15 17:00, tony mancill wrote:
> On 10/18/2015 04:58 AM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> On Fri, 16 Oct 2015 20:49:12 +0200 Felix Natter wrote:
>>> I added a patch for JMapViewer-1.11 compatibility:
>>> http://
Hi Felix,
I missed this update to the bugreport.
On Fri, 16 Oct 2015 20:49:12 +0200 Felix Natter wrote:
> I added a patch for JMapViewer-1.11 compatibility:
> http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-java/freeplane.git
>
> I've set the distribution to experimental since it should probably be
> uploa
Control: severity -1 serious
With the upload of jmapviewer (1.11+dfsg-1) to unstable today freeplane
now FTBFS.
Please update the openmaps plugin to support JMapViewer 1.11 or consider
adding skip_openmaps=true to debian/ant.properties.
Kind Regards,
Bas
__
This is the maintainer address of De
On 05/30/2015 10:31 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Tika uses metadata-extractor 2.6 up to the version 1.7, and the latest
> version 1.8 switched to metadata-extractor 2.8. Do you know if JOSM is
> compatible with this version?
Not explicitly, but looking at the release notes for 2.8 I don't see any
A
Control: reopen -1
Hi Emmanuel,
On 05/05/2015 06:35 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 03/10/2015 06:14 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>> Le 10/03/2015 17:50, Sebastiaan Couwenberg a écrit :
>>
>>> I can take care of gpsprune and josm.
>>
>> Thank you, I'
On Wed, 25 Feb 2015 20:26:11 -0300 Miguel Landaeta wrote:
> Package: src:jaffl
> Version: 0.5.9-5
> Severity: normal
>
> This package looks unmaintained and kinda abandoned by upstream.
It looks like upstream renamed the project, it lives on GitHub:
https://github.com/jnr/jnr-ffi
The 0.5 branch
On 03/10/2015 06:14 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 10/03/2015 17:50, Sebastiaan Couwenberg a écrit :
>
>> I can take care of gpsprune and josm.
>
> Thank you, I'll look into Tika.
>
>
>> The next version to be released next month will be compatible, its v
On 03/10/2015 06:14 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 10/03/2015 17:50, Sebastiaan Couwenberg a écrit :
>> The next version to be released next month will be compatible, its version
>> is not yet known, as it's based on the SVN revision.
>>
>> The current version and
On 03/10/2015 06:14 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 10/03/2015 17:50, Sebastiaan Couwenberg a écrit :
>
>> I can take care of gpsprune and josm.
>
> Thank you, I'll look into Tika.
I've patched gpsprune to build with metadata-extractor 2.7.2, and
uploaded gpsprune
> I'm going to upload the version 2.7.2 to experimental. It breaks
> libtika-java and gpsprune, some coordination will be required to
> transition smoothly.
Thanks for the quick response.
I can take care of gpsprune and josm.
> What is the first version of josm compatible with this version so I
Control: tags -1 patch
Hi Daniel,
This RC bug is threatening the removal of quite a number of Java
packages that depend on maven.
I've reproduced the issue you reported in an up-to-date sid chroot.
During the maven-compile phase the build attempts to download
maven-install-plugin-2.3.pom which
16 matches
Mail list logo
