On 30 Mar 2014 20:16, Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org wrote:
Control: tags 742405 + patch
On 28/03/14 20:30, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
This doesn't seem right to me. zookeeper ftbfs without openjdk sounds
like a build dependency should be more specific - instead of depending
on
...@ugent.be wrote:
Hi Tim,
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 08:42:08PM +, Tim Retout wrote:
Zookeeper also fails to build on sparc. These seem to be the
architectures where openjdk is not the default JDK.
This would explain why 3.4.5+dfsg-1 built successfully, because
openjdk was the default
Hi!
[Please CC me, because I am not subscribed to the list.]
I would like to prepare a backport of zookeeper to wheezy-backports.
I've prepared and tested a diff for this, and no special changes are
needed. Should I aim to get a branch/tags created in the git repo?
Kind regards,
--
Tim
/pkg-java
Thank you, I have requested it.
--
Tim Retout dioc...@debian.org
__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers.
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
This failure was because default-jdk was switched to be gcj on mips.
The -2 upload changed the build-dependency to be openjdk-6-jdk, but
has not changed JAVA_HOME to match. I'm just checking whether lwjgl
builds on mips with the change to JAVA_HOME.
--
Tim Retout dioc...@debian.org
5 matches
Mail list logo
