Bug#267040: gcjwebplugin runs untrusted code without sandbox

2008-10-20 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: On Sun, Sep 07, 2008 at 05:39:28PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: gcjwebplugin is a Java plugin for web browsers. It does not include the security manager which is a crucial part of the sandboxing of Java applets. The maintainers have fixed this bug (#267040) merely

Bug#267040: gcjwebplugin runs untrusted code without sandbox

2008-09-29 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
On Sun, Sep 07, 2008 at 05:39:28PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: gcjwebplugin is a Java plugin for web browsers. It does not include the security manager which is a crucial part of the sandboxing of Java applets. The maintainers have fixed this bug (#267040) merely by adding a warning prompt

Bug#267040: gcjwebplugin runs untrusted code without sandbox

2008-09-10 Thread Robert Millan
On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 11:11:45PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: It's not arbitrary. As it stands, this package is a security hole just waiting to be exploited if it gets released. I take it gdebi (or whatever it's called) is also a security hole then? It installs untrusted data when the user

Bug#267040: gcjwebplugin runs untrusted code without sandbox

2008-09-10 Thread Robert Millan
On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 11:11:45PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: I can't believe you're actually arguing that the solution against blindly trusting a website is blindly trusting a binary blob. I would rather use a secure free plugin than a secure non-free plugin, but apparently that doesn't

Bug#267040: gcjwebplugin runs untrusted code without sandbox

2008-09-10 Thread Osamu Aoki
Hi, On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 11:11:45PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 03:12:54PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: ... When a user navigates to a web page, they want to see that page. Any prompts on the way tend to be interpreted as do you want to see this web page or not?, to

Bug#267040: gcjwebplugin runs untrusted code without sandbox

2008-09-09 Thread Robert Millan
On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 11:51:55PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: How is this different from the multitude of interfaces in the system in which data is assumed to be trusted? Data from the network is generally treated as untrusted; The user is in charge. Data from the network becomes

Bug#267040: gcjwebplugin runs untrusted code without sandbox

2008-09-09 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 03:12:54PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: [ whoops, resending again...] On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 11:51:55PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: How is this different from the multitude of interfaces in the system in which data is assumed to be trusted? Data from

Bug#267040: gcjwebplugin runs untrusted code without sandbox

2008-09-09 Thread peter green
I can't believe you're actually arguing that the solution against blindly trusting a website is blindly trusting a binary blob. I would rather use a secure free plugin than a secure non-free plugin, but apparently that doesn't exist. Since the choice is between a secure non-free plugin and an

Bug#267040: gcjwebplugin runs untrusted code without sandbox

2008-09-08 Thread Robert Millan
On Sun, Sep 07, 2008 at 05:39:28PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: gcjwebplugin is a Java plugin for web browsers. It does not include the security manager which is a crucial part of the sandboxing of Java applets. The maintainers have fixed this bug (#267040) merely by adding a warning prompt

Bug#267040: gcjwebplugin runs untrusted code without sandbox

2008-09-08 Thread Robert Millan
[ sorry for the duplicate, my first reply didn't get to -release ] On Sun, Sep 07, 2008 at 05:39:28PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: gcjwebplugin is a Java plugin for web browsers. It does not include the security manager which is a crucial part of the sandboxing of Java applets. The

Bug#267040: gcjwebplugin runs untrusted code without sandbox

2008-09-08 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 05:02:11PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: On Sun, Sep 07, 2008 at 05:39:28PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: gcjwebplugin is a Java plugin for web browsers. It does not include the security manager which is a crucial part of the sandboxing of Java applets. The maintainers

Bug#267040: gcjwebplugin runs untrusted code without sandbox

2008-09-07 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Ben Hutchings] Please do not include it in lenny. (Unfortunately it is built from the classpath source package, so that will have to be modified to remove it.) Are there any free applet plugins available in main now? Perhaps the gcjwebplugin should be replaced by something from openjdk?