-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
I'm ok with changing the name to
libpostgresql-jdbc-java
Comments?
- --
.''`.
: :' :rnaud
`. `'
`-
Java Trap: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using
Package: libpgjava
Version: 8.0-312-1
Severity: wishlist
As long as you are randomly renaming the package, shouldn't you use the
upstream package name? That would be postgresql-jdbc so the package
should be called libpostgresql-jdbc-java. That would also have the nice
side effect that people
Hi Peter,
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Package: libpgjava
Version: 8.0-312-1
Severity: wishlist
As long as you are randomly renaming the package, shouldn't you use the
upstream package name?
I would not call it randomly - it was a change to comply with java policy !
That would be
On 10/29/05, Wolfgang Baer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
libpgjava is part of sarge and therefore a transitional package
as now exists needs to be kept. We can just rename libpg-java into
libpostgresql-jdbc-java.
Comments ?
According to my table,
4 matches
Mail list logo