Bug#341776:

2009-09-16 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
Is is possible to havve JAI in non-free meanwhile ? Thanks, -- Mathieu ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers

Bug#341776:

2009-09-16 Thread Michael Koch
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 03:32:36PM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > Is is possible to havve JAI in non-free meanwhile ? Have they changed their license meanwhile? Cheers, Michael ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alio

Bug#341776:

2009-09-16 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Michael Koch wrote: > On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 03:32:36PM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: >> Is is possible to havve JAI in non-free meanwhile ? > > Have they changed their license meanwhile? Obviously not. I would not be asking for non-free otherwise :) I'd like t

Bug#341776:

2009-09-16 Thread Michael Koch
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 04:13:25PM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Michael Koch wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 03:32:36PM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > >> Is is possible to havve JAI in non-free meanwhile ? > > > > Have they changed their license meanwhil

Bug#341776:

2010-01-25 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 3:34 PM, Michael Koch wrote: > On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 04:13:25PM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Michael Koch wrote: >> > On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 03:32:36PM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: >> >> Is is possible to havve JAI in non-free m

Bug#341776:

2010-01-25 Thread Torsten Werner
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 11:22 AM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > Hum, could someone confirm JAI has a new license: > > https://jai-imageio-core.dev.java.net/ looks good > Who is this 'Arnaud' ? How do I contact him ? He was a Debian developer but he is no longer one. There is no point in contacting

Bug#341776:

2010-01-25 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 3:05 PM, Torsten Werner wrote: > On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 11:22 AM, Mathieu Malaterre > wrote: >> Hum, could someone confirm JAI has a new license: >> >> https://jai-imageio-core.dev.java.net/ > For some reason I got confused and mixed-up jai and jai-imageio https://jai-c

Bug#341776: JAI Licensing

2009-01-07 Thread Craig Andrews
JAI seems to be still under the JDL/JRL. In 2005, a bug report was filed requesting a license change, and upstream agreed. https://jai-core.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=35 However, there has been no more news that I could find out this license change, and the license in the source repository

Bug#341776: Support Java Advanced Imaging, JAI Tools, JavaMail

2005-12-02 Thread Andreas Schildbach
Package: java-package Severity: wishlist JAI, JAI Tools and JavaMail - all of those can't be distributed as a .deb like the JDK or JRE. This qualifies them to be packaged by yourself, using a similar process (make-jpkg). ___ pkg-java-maintainers ma

Bug#341776: Support Java Advanced Imaging, JAI Tools, JavaMail

2005-12-02 Thread Aldous D. Penaranda
On 12/3/05, Andreas Schildbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > JAI, JAI Tools and JavaMail - all of those can't be distributed as a > .deb like the JDK or JRE. This qualifies them to be packaged by > yourself, using a similar process (make-jpkg). There's already libgnumail-java, a free implementation

Bug#341776: marked as done (Support Java Advanced Imaging, JAI Tools, JavaMail)

2010-04-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 341776: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=341776 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: java-package Severity: wishlist JAI, JAI Tools and JavaMail