Is is possible to havve JAI in non-free meanwhile ?
Thanks,
--
Mathieu
___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 03:32:36PM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> Is is possible to havve JAI in non-free meanwhile ?
Have they changed their license meanwhile?
Cheers,
Michael
___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alio
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Michael Koch wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 03:32:36PM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>> Is is possible to havve JAI in non-free meanwhile ?
>
> Have they changed their license meanwhile?
Obviously not. I would not be asking for non-free otherwise :)
I'd like t
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 04:13:25PM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Michael Koch wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 03:32:36PM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> >> Is is possible to havve JAI in non-free meanwhile ?
> >
> > Have they changed their license meanwhil
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 3:34 PM, Michael Koch wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 04:13:25PM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Michael Koch wrote:
>> > On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 03:32:36PM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>> >> Is is possible to havve JAI in non-free m
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 11:22 AM, Mathieu Malaterre
wrote:
> Hum, could someone confirm JAI has a new license:
>
> https://jai-imageio-core.dev.java.net/
looks good
> Who is this 'Arnaud' ? How do I contact him ?
He was a Debian developer but he is no longer one. There is no point
in contacting
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 3:05 PM, Torsten Werner wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 11:22 AM, Mathieu Malaterre
> wrote:
>> Hum, could someone confirm JAI has a new license:
>>
>> https://jai-imageio-core.dev.java.net/
>
For some reason I got confused and mixed-up jai and jai-imageio
https://jai-c
JAI seems to be still under the JDL/JRL. In 2005, a bug report was filed
requesting a license change, and upstream agreed.
https://jai-core.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=35 However, there has
been no more news that I could find out this license change, and the
license in the source repository
Package: java-package
Severity: wishlist
JAI, JAI Tools and JavaMail - all of those can't be distributed as a
.deb like the JDK or JRE. This qualifies them to be packaged by
yourself, using a similar process (make-jpkg).
___
pkg-java-maintainers ma
On 12/3/05, Andreas Schildbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> JAI, JAI Tools and JavaMail - all of those can't be distributed as a
> .deb like the JDK or JRE. This qualifies them to be packaged by
> yourself, using a similar process (make-jpkg).
There's already libgnumail-java, a free implementation
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
341776: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=341776
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: java-package
Severity: wishlist
JAI, JAI Tools and JavaMail
11 matches
Mail list logo