On Tue Sep 18 22:11, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> My script doesn't file any bug. I dunno why you think so. All bugs are
> filed manually.
Sorry, it did just look a lot like refiling the same bug, and I made an
assumption.
> Your package failed to build again in a sid chroot updated yesterday. In
> th
On 18/09/07 at 13:20 +0100, Matthew Johnson wrote:
> reassign 443039 gjdoc
> merge 439468 443039
> thanks
>
> Lucas, you already reported this as #439468, and I already reassigned
> it and merged it with the other FTBFS that gjdoc is causing. I don't
> suppose your scripts could refrain from filin
found 443039 0.7.8-6
thanks
On 18/09/07 at 20:07 +0200, Michael Koch wrote:
> Version: 0.7.8-5
>
> This bug was fixed in the version 0.7.8-5.
The package was built using version 0.7.8-6. Maybe it's a different
bug...
Lucas
___
pkg-java-maintainers
On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 09:17:53PM +0300, Touko Korpela wrote:
> Michael Koch wrote:
> >This bug was fixed in the version 0.7.8-5
>
> But this FTBFS build used 0.7.8-6. Is this bug reappeared?
Its definitely fixed. We had a lot of failing packages. Perhaps the fix
was not in gjdoc but in gcj-4.2.
Michael Koch wrote:
>This bug was fixed in the version 0.7.8-5
But this FTBFS build used 0.7.8-6. Is this bug reappeared?
___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinf
Version: 0.7.8-5
This bug was fixed in the version 0.7.8-5.
Cheers,
Michael
___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 443039 gjdoc
Bug#443039: libmatthew-java: FTBFS: Exception in thread "main"
java.lang.NullPointerException
Bug reassigned from package `libmatthew-java' to `gjdoc'.
> merge 439468 443039
Bug#4394
7 matches
Mail list logo
