On 13/02/12 09:43, Teodor MICU wrote:
> 2012/2/11 tony mancill :
>> Would there be a problem with simply addressing all of the rdepends
>> prior to the release? I believe Andrew Ross has filed bugs on the
>> affected packages.
>
> That's the think, I believe this won't be enough. I just noticed o
2012/2/11 tony mancill :
> Would there be a problem with simply addressing all of the rdepends
> prior to the release? I believe Andrew Ross has filed bugs on the
> affected packages.
That's the think, I believe this won't be enough. I just noticed on my
workstation that libpg-java is one of the
On 02/10/2012 12:04 AM, Teodor wrote:
> Source: libpgjava
> Version: 9.1-901-1
> Severity: normal
>
> Hi,
>
> The libpg-java is still a dependency on some packages in Debian.
> I think that it should be added back for Debian 7.0 and removed
> after the release. This packages should be mark transi
Source: libpgjava
Version: 9.1-901-1
Severity: normal
Hi,
The libpg-java is still a dependency on some packages in Debian.
I think that it should be added back for Debian 7.0 and removed
after the release. This packages should be mark transitional and
depend on libpostgresql-jdbc-java.
Also, bug
4 matches
Mail list logo
