Bug#690152: bsaf: FTBFS: Test org.jdesktop.application.TaskMonitorTest failed

2014-02-01 Thread Andreas Moog
Control: tags -1 -unreproducible On 01.02.2014 17:23, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > On 2014-02-01 17:03, Niels Thykier wrote: >>> Therefore removing the wheezy tag, as the new issue only affects sid. > >> Is that "only sid" or "sid and jessie"? You said the former, but the >> bug is tagged "sid jess

Processed: Re: Bug#690152: bsaf: FTBFS: Test org.jdesktop.application.TaskMonitorTest failed

2014-02-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 -unreproducible Bug #690152 [src:bsaf] bsaf: FTBFS: Test org.jdesktop.application.TaskMonitorTest failed Removed tag(s) unreproducible. -- 690152: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690152 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.

Bug#690152: bsaf: FTBFS: Test org.jdesktop.application.TaskMonitorTest failed

2014-02-01 Thread Andreas Beckmann
On 2014-02-01 17:03, Niels Thykier wrote: >> Therefore removing the wheezy tag, as the new issue only affects sid. > Is that "only sid" or "sid and jessie"? You said the former, but the > bug is tagged "sid jessie" implying you might mean the other. I don't know, haven't tried (and don't plan to

Bug#690152: bsaf: FTBFS: Test org.jdesktop.application.TaskMonitorTest failed

2014-02-01 Thread Niels Thykier
On 2014-02-01 16:39, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > Control: tag -1 - wheezy > > On Sunday, 10. March 2013 03:50:40 Andres Mejia wrote: >> At this time, being this late into the release cycle, I would like to >> support only the default-jdk. I am building with sbuild using a chroot >> created by sbuild

Bug#690152: bsaf: FTBFS: Test org.jdesktop.application.TaskMonitorTest failed

2014-02-01 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Control: tag -1 - wheezy On Sunday, 10. March 2013 03:50:40 Andres Mejia wrote: > At this time, being this late into the release cycle, I would like to > support only the default-jdk. I am building with sbuild using a chroot > created by sbuild-createchroot as I believe this closely matches what >

Processed: Re: Bug#690152: bsaf: FTBFS: Test org.jdesktop.application.TaskMonitorTest failed

2014-02-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 - wheezy Bug #690152 [src:bsaf] bsaf: FTBFS: Test org.jdesktop.application.TaskMonitorTest failed Removed tag(s) wheezy. -- 690152: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690152 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problem

Bug#690152: bsaf: FTBFS: Test org.jdesktop.application.TaskMonitorTest failed

2014-02-01 Thread Andreas Moog
Control: severity -1 serious Hi there, the package fails to build when rebuilding with sbuild in a current sid chroot, so I'm raising severity to "serious" again: [junit] - Standard Error - [junit] Feb 01, 2014 2:55:08 PM org.jdesktop.application.ResourceManag

Bug#690152: bsaf: FTBFS: Test org.jdesktop.application.TaskMonitorTest failed

2013-03-09 Thread Andres Mejia
On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 8:42 AM, gregor herrmann wrote: > On Sat, 02 Mar 2013 19:12:32 -0500, Andres Mejia wrote: > >> I just rebuilt bsaf on my machine that has the DISPLAY environment variable >> set and > > In a chroot or in the "normal" environment? The "normal" environment. >> on a sid and w

Bug#690152: bsaf: FTBFS: Test org.jdesktop.application.TaskMonitorTest failed

2013-03-06 Thread gregor herrmann
On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 14:42:09 +0100, gregor herrmann wrote: > As mentioned earlier in this bug log by Matteo, building with > openjdk-7-jdk works in the same setup. Not anymore: [junit] Running org.jdesktop.application.TaskMonitorTest [junit] Testsuite: org.jdesktop.application.TaskMonito

Bug#690152: bsaf: FTBFS: Test org.jdesktop.application.TaskMonitorTest failed

2013-03-03 Thread gregor herrmann
On Sat, 02 Mar 2013 19:12:32 -0500, Andres Mejia wrote: > I just rebuilt bsaf on my machine that has the DISPLAY environment variable > set and In a chroot or in the "normal" environment? > on a sid and wheezy chroot via sbuild-shell (which in turn uses > schroot) that does not have DISPLAY set

Bug#690152: bsaf: FTBFS: Test org.jdesktop.application.TaskMonitorTest failed

2013-03-02 Thread Andres Mejia
On Monday, January 7, 2013, Joost Yervante Damad wrote: > On 01/07/2013 07:48 PM, gregor herrmann wrote: > >> On Sat, 15 Dec 2012 16:13:35 +0100, Joost Yervante Damad wrote: >> >> I tried rebuilding the bsaf software in wheezy with default-jdk, >>> which uses the openjdk from openjdk-6-jre-headle

Bug#690152: bsaf: FTBFS: Test org.jdesktop.application.TaskMonitorTest failed

2013-01-07 Thread Joost Yervante Damad
On 01/07/2013 07:48 PM, gregor herrmann wrote: On Sat, 15 Dec 2012 16:13:35 +0100, Joost Yervante Damad wrote: I tried rebuilding the bsaf software in wheezy with default-jdk, which uses the openjdk from openjdk-6-jre-headless_6b24. It builds just fine. Is this really still an issue? It still

Bug#690152: bsaf: FTBFS: Test org.jdesktop.application.TaskMonitorTest failed

2013-01-07 Thread gregor herrmann
On Sat, 15 Dec 2012 16:13:35 +0100, Joost Yervante Damad wrote: > I tried rebuilding the bsaf software in wheezy with default-jdk, > which uses the openjdk from openjdk-6-jre-headless_6b24. > It builds just fine. > Is this really still an issue? It still fails to build for me in wheezy and sid ch

Bug#690152: bsaf: FTBFS: Test org.jdesktop.application.TaskMonitorTest failed

2012-12-15 Thread Joost Yervante Damad
Hey, I tried rebuilding the bsaf software in wheezy with default-jdk, which uses the openjdk from openjdk-6-jre-headless_6b24. It builds just fine. Is this really still an issue? Joost __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team

Bug#690152: Bug #690152: bsaf: FTBFS: Test org.jdesktop.application.TaskMonitorTest failed

2012-11-23 Thread Michael Banck
690152 fixed 1.9-3 thanks On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 04:22:11PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Source: bsaf > Version: 1.9-3 > Severity: serious > Tags: wheezy sid > User: debian...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20121010 qa-ftbfs > Justification: FTBFS in wheezy on amd64 > > Hi, > > During

Bug#690152: bsaf: FTBFS: Test org.jdesktop.application.TaskMonitorTest failed

2012-11-04 Thread gregor herrmann
On Sat, 03 Nov 2012 18:36:09 +, Matteo Vescovi wrote: > The stack trace led me to suspect the root cause of the issue lies > in the java.beans package. > > I built the bsaf sources and tests with the default jdk > (/usr/lib/jvm/default-java -> java-6-openjdk) and then ran the > entire testsui

Bug#690152: bsaf: FTBFS: Test org.jdesktop.application.TaskMonitorTest failed

2012-11-03 Thread Ulrich Dangel
* gregor herrmann wrote [24.10.12 17:13]: Hi, > Running the tests under xvfb I get a different failure: JFTR I get the exact same error messages running it directly in X11. > (and it goes on and on for pages) > > So: no idea :/ > > (I'm still attaching the change to use xvfb which seems to be

Bug#690152: bsaf: FTBFS: Test org.jdesktop.application.TaskMonitorTest failed

2012-11-03 Thread Matteo Vescovi
Hi, The stack trace led me to suspect the root cause of the issue lies in the java.beans package. I built the bsaf sources and tests with the default jdk (/usr/lib/jvm/default-java -> java-6-openjdk) and then ran the entire testsuite with openjdk-7-jdk by changing the exported JAVA_HOME to

Bug#690152: bsaf: FTBFS: Test, org.jdesktop.application.TaskMonitorTest, failed

2012-11-03 Thread Matteo Vescovi
The first failing test is BadSessionStateTest. The first exception in the log is actually expected: [junit] java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: 0 [junit] at com.sun.beans.ObjectHandler.dequeueResult(ObjectHandler.java:189) [junit] at java.beans.XMLDecode

Bug#690152: bsaf: FTBFS: Test, org.jdesktop.application.TaskMonitorTest failed

2012-11-03 Thread Matteo Vescovi
Hi, Here's what I found out so far about this bug. Unsetting the DISPLAY environment variable works around the FTBFS error by skipping the failing Junit tests. However, unsetting DISPLAY is not the preferable/acceptable solution, as it simply skips the failing tests. Check out the build.xml.

Bug#690152: bsaf: FTBFS: Test org.jdesktop.application.TaskMonitorTest failed

2012-10-24 Thread gregor herrmann
On Thu, 11 Oct 2012 22:21:04 -0700, tony mancill wrote: > >> During a rebuild of all packages in *wheezy*, your package failed to > >> build on amd64. > > I couldn't reproduce this in wheezy or sid, but I was only using pbuilder > > to test. > I was able to get the build to fail by setting DISPLA

Bug#690152: bsaf: FTBFS: Test org.jdesktop.application.TaskMonitorTest failed

2012-10-11 Thread tony mancill
On 10/10/2012 07:12 PM, Miguel Landaeta wrote: > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 04:22:11PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: >> Source: bsaf >> Version: 1.9-3 >> Severity: serious >> Tags: wheezy sid >> User: debian...@lists.debian.org >> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20121010 qa-ftbfs >> Justification: FTBFS in wheezy o

Bug#690152: bsaf: FTBFS: Test org.jdesktop.application.TaskMonitorTest failed

2012-10-10 Thread Miguel Landaeta
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 04:22:11PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Source: bsaf > Version: 1.9-3 > Severity: serious > Tags: wheezy sid > User: debian...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20121010 qa-ftbfs > Justification: FTBFS in wheezy on amd64 > > Hi, > > During a rebuild of all packages i

Bug#690152: bsaf: FTBFS: Test org.jdesktop.application.TaskMonitorTest failed

2012-10-10 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Source: bsaf Version: 1.9-3 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20121010 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS in wheezy on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in *wheezy*, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > debian/rules bui