Re: Bug#793984: jessie-pu: package groovy/1.8.6-4

2016-05-21 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 -moreinfo +pending On Fri, 2015-09-11 at 18:01 -0300, Miguel Landaeta wrote: > On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 06:56:38PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > > > > Moving the rdeps to groovy2 seems the better fix to me (#793911). > > I agree on that and I believe debian-java is working

Re: Bug#793984: jessie-pu: package groovy/1.8.6-4

2015-09-11 Thread Miguel Landaeta
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 06:56:38PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > > Moving the rdeps to groovy2 seems the better fix to me (#793911). I agree on that and I believe debian-java is working towards that goal. However, I have not figured yet out how to fix CVE-2015-3253 since groovy FTBFS in

Re: Bug#793984: jessie-pu: package groovy/1.8.6-4

2015-08-31 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 08:26:05AM -0300, Miguel Landaeta wrote: > On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 07:05:26PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > > I just realised that I somehow overlooked the fact that #793397 isn't > > fixed in unstable yet - what's the plan for that? > > I intend to fix this soon

Re: Bug#793984: jessie-pu: package groovy/1.8.6-4

2015-08-20 Thread Miguel Landaeta
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 07:05:26PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: I just realised that I somehow overlooked the fact that #793397 isn't fixed in unstable yet - what's the plan for that? I intend to fix this soon but I haven't managed to fix a FTBFS bug for groovy in unstable yet that is