Hi,
On 22/05/14 14:00, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
Some js-files are licensed under MIT, GPL or Apache-2. These licenses are
not mentioned in debian/copyright.
Please also remove all minified js-files where no sources are provided.
Right, I understand the problem now, and I'd like some advice,
On 30/05/14 10:32, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Le 30/05/2014 11:11, Matthew Vernon a écrit :
What would you prefer? i) has the advantages of leaving the source as
upstream have it in their SVN ; ii) is perhaps the right compromise
option; iii) seems too extreme.
IMHO if the minified JavaScript
Le 30/05/2014 11:11, Matthew Vernon a écrit :
What would you prefer? i) has the advantages of leaving the source as
upstream have it in their SVN ; ii) is perhaps the right compromise
option; iii) seems too extreme.
IMHO if the minified JavaScript files are only test objects they should
be
Le 30/05/2014 11:37, Matthew Vernon a écrit :
It's difficult to determine what license they might be covered by;
AFAICT they are the result of pointing something like wget at a bunch of
sites, namely: cnn.com, deadspin.com, fark.com, google.com,
microsoft.com, slashdot.org
In this case I
On 30/05/14 10:47, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Le 30/05/2014 11:37, Matthew Vernon a écrit :
It's difficult to determine what license they might be covered by;
AFAICT they are the result of pointing something like wget at a bunch of
sites, namely: cnn.com, deadspin.com, fark.com, google.com,
Dear Maintainer,
unfortunately I have to reject your package.
Some js-files are licensed under MIT, GPL or Apache-2. These licenses are
not mentioned in debian/copyright.
Please also remove all minified js-files where no sources are provided.
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to
6 matches
Mail list logo
