Version: 1.6.4-4
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 03:34:31PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
Package: groovy
Version: 1.6.4-4
Severity: serious
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu karmic
There are a lot of files licensed under the Apache-2.0 license; the
debian/copyright file
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 03:42:20PM +0100, Michael Terry wrote:
Package: antlr3
Version: 3.0.1+dfsg-4
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu karmic ubuntu-patch
I was looking into enabling the testsuite in Ubuntu, and the attached diff
On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 08:12:50PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 25/10/09 at 19:39 +0100, Michael Koch wrote:
On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 08:54:45PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Source: libgnucrypto-java
Version: 2.1.0-3
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags
On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 08:54:45PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Source: libgnucrypto-java
Version: 2.1.0-3
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20091005 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package
tags 549838 - unreproducible
thanks
On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 04:24:45PM +0530, Onkar Shinde wrote:
tags 549838 + unreproducible
thanks
excalibur-logkit has alternate build dependency on libjboss-j2ee-java.
So it should not fail to build.
This bug is not reproducible in pbuilder chroot for
On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 03:56:42PM +0200, Folkert van Heusden wrote:
Ok problem can be closed: it DOES open ports, it only takes a couple of
minutes(!) to do so.
Closing bug.
Cheers,
Michael
___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
On Thu, Oct 01, 2009 at 10:48:20AM +0200, Folkert van Heusden wrote:
Package: tomcat6
Version: 6.0.20-5
Severity: normal
Tomcat6 wants to bind to port 8080. This, in my case, conflicts with other
installed software. Solution would be making the tomcat6 bind-port
configurable.
On Fri, Oct 02, 2009 at 03:19:19PM +0200, Folkert van Heusden wrote:
Package: tomcat6
Version: 6.0.20-5
Severity: normal
Tomcat6 wants to bind to port 8080. This, in my case, conflicts with
other installed software. Solution would be making the tomcat6 bind-port
configurable.
On Fri, Oct 02, 2009 at 04:07:11PM +0200, Folkert van Heusden wrote:
Package: tomcat6
Version: 6.0.20-5
Severity: normal
After restarting tomcat6, it won't listen on any ports.
E.g.
/etc/init.d/tomcat6 restart
Connector port=8880 protocol=HTTP/1.1
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 10:26:07AM +0200, Jakub Skoczen wrote:
On my machine all jars under /usr/share/maven-repo/javax are real
files and not symlinks. That includes Servlet, JSP and Expression
Language APIs so stuff definitely loaded by tomcat:
|-- javax
| |-- el
| | `-- el-api
|
On Sat, May 02, 2009 at 10:05:42AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
Package: libjibx-java
Version: 1.0.2-1
Please upgrade the package to version 1.2.1, which is a build
dependency of OpenJDK 7.
I have done a prelimiary package if libjibx-java 1.2.1. Unfortunatly
it needs Eclipse libraries for
Hello,
On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 05:24:33PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
Source: kaffe
Version: 2:1.1.8-5.3
Severity: important
Hi,
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
Start Time: 20090918-1956
[...]
Build-Depends: debhelper (= 5), libpng12-dev,
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 04:57:37PM +0200, Steffen Moeller wrote:
Package: pdfsam
Version: 1.1.3-1
Severity: serious
Hello,
when invoking pdfsam-console regularly, I just get no error but unreadable
files.
When following the instructions from pdfsam-console -h, I get the following:
$
On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 09:25:21AM -0400, Patrick McFarland wrote:
Basically, either allow Ivy to work by default with no additional
changes, or don't bother packaging Ivy at all. People are going to get
really confused when they apt-get install ivy and it doesn't work and
there are no
Version: 2.0.8a-5
On Wed, Oct 01, 2008 at 11:25:20PM +0200, Kolja Nowak wrote:
Package: liboro-java
Version: 2.0.8a-4
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
can liboro-java depend only on -headless java runtime packages?
Ubuntu has it allready done this way, therefore I assume it should work:
-
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 09:10:10AM +0200, Marcus Better wrote:
Michael Koch wrote:
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 04:31:54AM -0400, Patrick McFarland wrote:
I would also like to see Ivy added to ant/lib. Ivy is a special case
in that it is a sister project to Ant
I would prefer this decision
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 10:26:47PM +0200, Alban Browaeys wrote:
Package: libpg-java
Version: 8.2-504-2
Severity: normal
p2 console log (not shown in the UI) while upgrading to 3.5 M2
(http://wiki.eclipse.org/Eclipse_Project_Update_Sites).
!MESSAGE Unable to satisfy dependency from
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 11:35:17AM +0200, Jakub Skoczen wrote:
Hi Ludovic,
I don't see the new packages being available in testing yet, at least
not on danish mirrors. I'll upgrade and test them as soon as they are.
It will not be in testing for at least the next 10 days as we just uploaded
@lists.alioth.debian.org
Uploaders: Marcus Better mar...@better.se, Michael Koch konque...@gmx.de
Build-Depends: debhelper (= 5)
-Build-Depends-Indep: antlr, openjdk-6-jdk, ant-optional, libjaxen-java (=
1.1~beta11), libjaxme-java, libxpp2-java, libxpp3-java, libxerces2-java,
libxalan2-java
Package: libhamcrest-java
Version: 1.1-2
Severity: wishlist
hamcrest 1.2 is out. It should be packaged. Problem is that JUnit 4
Build-Depends on hamcrest and breaks with hamcrest 1.2. In JUnit GIT
repository you can even see that they tried to use hamcrest 1.2 and
reverted all changes related to
reassign 547735 bootchart
thanks
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 02:01:17AM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
Package: libcommons-compress-java
Version: 1.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: breaks unrelated packages
Well the package is not unrelated, bootchart depends on
libcommons-compress-java.
Hello,
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 12:29:11PM +0100, Ludovic Claude wrote:
This was a temporary issue with the way I installed jars both to
/usr/share/java and /usr/share/maven-repo. In an old version of
maven-repo-helper, the script mh_installjar was copying the jars to
/usr/share/maven-repo
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 11:20:24AM -0400, Barry deFreese wrote:
Torsten Werner wrote:
wrong/missing license and copyright statements:
COPYING: GPL-3+
src/java_crw_demo.c and src/java_crw_demo.h:
Copyright (c) 2006 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
other license that
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 04:31:54AM -0400, Patrick McFarland wrote:
I would also like to see Ivy added to ant/lib. Ivy is a special case
in that it is a sister
project to Ant and people expect Ivy to work by default when installing it.
I find a dpkg configure option an acceptable alternative
Version: 2.1.10-5
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 11:05:16AM -0600, Chris Cheney wrote:
Package: libxpp2-java
Version: 2.1.10-4
Severity: important
Tags: patch
This is a patch to convert libxpp2-java to use default-jre and also
fixes the various lintian errors that are being output.
All issues
Version: 7+svn20070309-3
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 01:30:16PM -0600, Chris Cheney wrote:
Package: jtidy
Version: 7+svn20070309-2
Severity: important
Tags: patch
This is a patch to convert jtidy to use default-jre and also
fixes the various lintian errors that are being output.
All the
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 09:15:47PM +0100, Ludovic Claude wrote:
Yes, this version should fix this bug. It works for me, Jakub, can you
confirm that the fix works for you as well?
I have made some small changes and uploaded to the archive.
Thanks for your work.
Cheers,
Michael
Version: 1.0.1-3
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 01:06:04PM +0100, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
Package: libjmock-java-doc
Severity: wishlist
As this package contains documentation, shouldn't it be moved to the
doc section?
Thanks for taking the time to write this bug report. This bug was
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 09:29:55AM +0530, Onkar Shinde wrote:
Ant upstream authors recommend using classpath attribute for optional
ant tasks when defining the task in build.xml.[1] Hence the symlink
should not be present in ant's library. Also the symlink modifies the
default classpath of ant
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 11:59:53PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 11:12:22PM +0200, Michael Koch wrote:
Do you have any specific showstopper for filing a removal request RoM
right ahead?
The only showstopper I can think is that the built kaffe VM might
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 07:39:04AM -0400, Michael R Head wrote:
Package: libcommons-launcher-java
Version: 1.1-4
Severity: normal
I just dist-upgraded libcommons-launcher-java, and it forcibly pulled in
openjdk, which I don't wish to install. I was
quite happy having only the sun-java6
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 03:38:48PM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
Hi there,
Does anyone knows where are the debian/* files.
It seems Arnaud Vandyck did it at some point, according to:
https://jai-core.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=35
Nothing in pkg-java SVN. Perhaps Arnaud has
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 04:13:25PM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Michael Koch konque...@gmx.de wrote:
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 03:32:36PM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
Is is possible to havve JAI in non-free meanwhile ?
Have they changed their license
Hello zack,
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 09:25:00PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
I've prepared an NMU for kaffe (versioned as 2:1.1.8-5.3) and uploaded
it to DELAYED/2, as allowed by devref §5.11.1. The patch generalize the
build-dep which was on gcj-4.2 to plain gcj.
The current plan is to
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 10:47:08PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 10:28:43PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
Many thanks in advance,
BTW, I forgot to mention, it is of course totally up to you to decide
whether let my delayed NMU flow in or not. I doubt it will do
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 09:53:22PM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
Hi
After having looked at kaffe I have noticed it seems lacks maintenance
both from the Debian side but also upstream seems rather dead. We got an
120 days old FTBFS RC bug (#529872) and alternatives exists. So I
figured perhaps
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 10:01:04PM +0200, Torsten Werner wrote:
On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 5:12 PM, Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net wrote:
Shouldn't the libjgrapht0.6 then have the Replaces entry in the
control file?
No, the old package should get removed. Steffen filed the removal
request
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 10:43:57PM +0200, Torsten Werner wrote:
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 10:25 PM, Michael Koch konque...@gmx.de wrote:
And what about people who have the old package already installed?
A Replaces helps them and is needed in this case afaik.
A Replaces won't hurt but I am
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 10:26:12PM +0200, Torsten Werner wrote:
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 9:06 PM, Chris Lamb la...@debian.org wrote:
Package: pj
Severity: serious
Version: 0.0~20080628-1
no reverse (build) deps, low popcon, outdated upstream version, last
upload 14 months, nobody cared
On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 06:06:41PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
reassign 544546 fop
retitle 544546 should provide libfop-java
Why? There is no real need to for this. Any packages can depend on fop
and be done. The reason why it was called fop and not libfop-java was that
it is not only a
On Sat, Sep 05, 2009 at 09:44:25PM +0200, Michael Koch wrote:
tag 540737 + confirmed
thanks
On Sun, Aug 09, 2009 at 09:14:49PM -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
| Setting up libantlr2.7-cil (2.7.7-11) ...
| * Installing 2 assemblies from libantlr2.7-cil into Mono
| E: installing Assembly /usr
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny6
reassign 439725 antlr3
___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
forwarded 505596 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41303
tag 505596 + upstream
thanks
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 08:17:08PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
Package: classpath
Version: 2:0.97.2-1.1
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-gcc-4.4
Your package fails to build
tag 540737 + confirmed
thanks
On Sun, Aug 09, 2009 at 09:14:49PM -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
| Setting up libantlr2.7-cil (2.7.7-11) ...
| * Installing 2 assemblies from libantlr2.7-cil into Mono
| E: installing Assembly /usr/lib/cli/antlr-2.7/antlr.astframe.dll failed
| E: Installation of
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 10:48:16PM -0400, Alex Mizrahi wrote:
Package: libapache2-mod-jk
Version: 1:1.2.18-3etch1
Severity: important
after update to 1.2.18-3etch1 (not sure about that),
mod_jk stopped using URL produced by mod_rewrite, but
used original URL instead. upgrading to a version
Hello Warun,
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 10:08:26PM -0400, Varun Hiremath wrote:
I am having trouble uploading packages to pkg-java repository. The
error message (same as the 'mini-dinstall log notice (ERROR)' mailed
to group) that I get is attached to this mail. I am using the dput
template
reopen 426761 !
thanks
Hello,
I don't know whether this is fixed in tomcat6 but, because of new
technology, I won't track Tomcat bugs anymore.
Please don't just close bugs you are not interested in anymore.
Cheers,
Michael
___
On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 02:31:19PM +0200, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Michael Koch wrote:
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 12:33:45PM +0200, Torsten Werner wrote:
The discussion is probably over because jetty 6.1.19-1 has been
accepted into experimental. But we can still call the next major
version
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 12:33:45PM +0200, Torsten Werner wrote:
The discussion is probably over because jetty 6.1.19-1 has been
accepted into experimental. But we can still call the next major
version jetty7.
As long as jetty 6.x is not in unstable nothing is decided. Its still
possible to do
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 11:29:29AM +0200, Torsten Werner wrote:
as a first result from Debconf9 I am announcing the setup of an
inofficial package archive and upload queue. The details can be found
in the Debian wiki at http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/JavaPackaging.
I'll move my packages now from
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 09:43:07AM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
Hi
I just tested this with bsh (version 2.0b4) and it does not seem to work
for me. Neither the previous example nor
String a = Hello
System.out.println(a);
Which works directly in bsh, but not from a #!/usr/bin/bsh
reassign 507089 jamvm
close 507089 1.5.1-1
thanks
Just cleaning up some old mails...
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 10:28:35PM +0100, Carsten Pfeiffer wrote:
Never mind, this is not a classpath, but a jamvm issue. It works perfectly
with Jamvm 1.5.1.
Thanks for the report and solutionn.
Cheers,
Hello,
just to through my two cents into the ring...
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 12:21:45PM +0100, Ludovic Claude wrote:
Hello Thierry,
I have no preference between jetty and jetty6. I already renamed jetty6
to jetty after a suggestion from Marcus Better, I can reverse this
change easily.
tag 487036 pending
thanks
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 12:04:22PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Package: dom4j
Version: 1.6.1+dfsg-3
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080619 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your
On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 04:42:14PM -0500, John Davos wrote:
Michael,
Were you referring to the 3 process instances of Tomcat or the startup
problem? I just upgraded tomcat5.5 to tomcat5.5.26-3 and the startup script
problem appears to have been fixed, however I still see 3 tomcat processes
On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 08:53:17PM +0200, tom wrote:
Hi
for those who just want to install azureus and eclipse and don't know
how to do it and don't care about this discussion, here's a simple
workaround. Just become root and execute the attached script in a shell.
Hope it helps somebody
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 01:31:36AM +0200, Sandro Tosi wrote:
Hi Michael,
sorry for the late reply
searching for compatible vm...
testing /usr/lib/jvm/java-7-icedtea...not found
testing /usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj...not found
testing /usr/lib/kaffe/pthreads...not found
On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 06:32:40AM +0100, David Pashley wrote:
On Jun 14, 2008 at 00:11, [EMAIL PROTECTED] praised the llamas by saying:
Could you specify what the actual bugs that block tomcat6 in Debian are?
None really. I don't have a sid box around to build the package on right
now, but
tag 485600 confirmed
thanks
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 12:29:35PM +0200, Detlev Brodowski wrote:
Package: tomcat5.5
Version: 5.5.26-3
Severity: minor
The log files in /var/log/tomcat5.5/ should have the same group
permissions as the other log files in the debian system
-rw-r-
On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 02:49:31PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 09:32:42AM +0200, Michael Koch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.29
#
# eclipse (3.2.2-7) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
#
# * Build-Depends
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.29
#
# eclipse (3.2.2-7) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
#
# * Build-Depends on iceape-dev instead of libxul-dev for Debian.
#Closes: #480794
#
package eclipse-efj eclipse-jdt eclipse-platform libswt3.2-gtk-jni eclipse-sdk
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.29
#
# tomcat5.5 (5.5.26-3) unstable; urgency=high
#
# * CVE-2008-1947: Fix XSS issue in host-manager web application.
#Closes: #484643
#
package tomcat5.5-admin libtomcat5.5-java tomcat5.5-webapps tomcat5.5
tags 484643 +
tag 483919 upstream
forwarded 483919 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36448
thanks
On Sun, Jun 01, 2008 at 10:51:10AM +0200, Josef Spillner wrote:
Package: classpath-qtpeer
Version: 2:0.97.1-3
Severity: normal
I'm trying to run a hybrid Java applet/application on an AMD64 sid
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 07:43:37AM +0200, Sandro Tosi wrote:
Package: eclipse
Version: 3.2.2-5
Severity: important
Hello,
eclipse fails to start since it misses a JRE/JDK, but:
# apt-get install eclipse
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading
On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 01:43:36PM +0200, Jakub Lucký wrote:
Package: eclipse-sdk
Version: 3.2.2-5
Severity: normal
New version can't be installed due to apt dependency problem
Apt output:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/etc# apt-get install eclipse-sdk
Reading package lists... Done
Building
On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 06:00:54PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
Source: gjdoc
Severity: important
Version: 0.7.9-1
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: goal-dash
Hello maintainer,
While checking for bashisms in debian/rules with checkbashisms (from
the 'devscripts' package) I've found
On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 05:46:21PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
Source: ecj
Severity: important
Version: 3.3.0+0728-9
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: goal-dash
Hello maintainer,
While checking for bashisms in debian/rules with checkbashisms (from
the 'devscripts' package) I've
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.28
#
# eclipse-pydev (1.2.5-2) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
#
# * Fix bashism in debian/rules. Closes: #484377.
#
package eclipse-pydev eclipse-pydev-gcj
tags 484377 + pending
___
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 02:09:10AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
Package: cacao
Version: 0.99~rc5-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
your package failed to build from source.
The reason seems to be that configure tries to compile an executable
with -m64 which fails since gcc-multilib isn't
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 09:07:12PM +0200, Philippe Coval wrote:
Tags: patch
It seems that the jar file is badly linked :
I think this can be easly fixed using wildcards in debian/rules
check this patch attached or online at :
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 03:06:39PM +0100, Paul Cager wrote:
John Davos wrote:
Good Day All,
I installed tomcat5.5.26-1on testing and unstable and the startup script
(/etc/init.d/tomcat5.5) doesn't start tomcat and exits without output in the
log or at console. I started with a fresh
tag 479226 unreproducible help
thanks
Hello,
On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 10:50:54AM +0200, Marcus Better wrote:
tag 479226 -unreproducible help
On Fri, May 09, 2008 at 09:09:01AM +0200, Giuseppe Sacco wrote:
Hi Michael,
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 09:15:03AM +0200, Giuseppe Sacco wrote:
Hi Michael,
I am unsure about what you mean for plug-in. BTW I downloaded the x64
version from java.sun.com, not the 32 bit version.
I am not
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 10:04:30AM +0200, Laurens Blankers wrote:
severity 445848 important
thanks
This is rather important because it prevents tomcat from starting.
Adding /usr/share/java/commons-logging.jar to JSVC_CLASSPATH in
/etc/init.d/tomcat5.5 resolves (or at least works around)
On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 11:00:33PM +0300, Teodor wrote:
Package: fop
Version: 1:0.94.dfsg-2
Severity: important
An xml - pdf transformation is not working anymore. This is the log
from the console:
Can you please attach a small testcase that reproduces this for you?
Thanks in advance.
On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 11:24:20AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael Koch wrote:
On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 03:28:47PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As Peter points out it is probably a jsvc problem but I was not able to
make it run by running dpkg-buildpackage on jsvc
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 09:15:03AM +0200, Giuseppe Sacco wrote:
Hi Michael,
I am unsure about what you mean for plug-in. BTW I downloaded the x64
version from java.sun.com, not the 32 bit version.
I am not sure the x64 tarball was available before, so maybe you did not
know about this new
reassign 477689 wnpp
retitle 477689 RFP: antlr 3 python runtime
thanks
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 05:07:20PM +0200, Mattia Monga wrote:
Package: antlr3
Version: 3.0.1+dfsg-2
Severity: wishlist
Please add the run-time support for Python targets, available at
On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 11:14:24AM +0300, Boris Shtrasman wrote:
Package: eclipse
Version: 3.2.2-5
Severity: normal
When tring to get another options (using eclipse update) i was told that
i need to install a special patch :
Eclipse Java Development Tools 3.2.1 performance patch
On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 11:09:17AM +0300, Boris Shtrasman wrote:
Package: eclipse
Version: 3.2.2-5
Severity: minor
Eclipse has an option of downloading and installng plugins or core
parts.
using the options :
software updates-install / update -search new features
by that you can
On Sat, May 03, 2008 at 09:38:34PM +0300, Ionut Ciocirlan wrote:
Package: eclipse
Version: 3.2.2-5
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
*** Please type your report below this line ***
Eclipse invariably starts up properly, displays the UI for a short
moment, then closes
On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 09:27:12AM +0200, Michael Koch wrote:
On Sat, May 03, 2008 at 09:38:34PM +0300, Ionut Ciocirlan wrote:
Package: eclipse
Version: 3.2.2-5
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
*** Please type your report below this line ***
Eclipse
On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 09:14:35PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael Koch wrote:
On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 05:55:07PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Marcus Better wrote:
It seems like since I updated to tomcat5.5_5.5.26 I am having this
problem.
May 5 14:34:04 localhost
tag 479226 unreproducible help
thanks
On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 01:17:22PM +0300, Ionut Ciocirlan wrote:
No, it doesn't.
What does indeed work is starting with a fresh workbench -- i.e. rm
workspace/.metadata/.plugins/org.eclipse.ui.workbench/workbench.xml
I tried isolating the offending
On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 03:28:47PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As Peter points out it is probably a jsvc problem but I was not able to make
it run by running dpkg-buildpackage on jsvc and reinstalling.
I hunted the issue down to being caused by linux-libc-dev. When
compiling againt
On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 07:10:00PM +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
Package: eclipse-cdt
Version: 3.1.2-2
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
Automatic build of eclipse-cdt_3.1.2-2 on lebrun by sbuild/sparc 98
Build started at 20080501-1740
On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 10:36:43PM +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
Package: libjdic-java
Version: 0.0.20060613-8
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
Automatic build of libjdic-java_0.0.20060613-8 on lebrun by sbuild/sparc 98
Build started at
On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 12:45:57PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
Package: cacao
Version: 0.99~rc3-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
your package failed to build from source.
| Automatic build of cacao_0.99~rc3-1 on signy by sbuild/mips 98-farm
| Build started at 20080505-0116
|
On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 05:55:07PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Marcus Better wrote:
It seems like since I updated to tomcat5.5_5.5.26 I am having this
problem.
May 5 14:34:04 localhost jsvc.exec[7386]: check that your kernel
supports capabilities
Does it? What does grep
On Sun, May 04, 2008 at 09:29:04PM +0200, Sloopkogel wrote:
Forgot to mention that module capability is inserted.
On Sunday 04 May 2008, you wrote:
Hello,
After a recent dist-upgrade, starting Tomcat does not succeed because
of an unexpected error in jsvc.
Versions of the software
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.26
#
# eclipse (3.2.2-6) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
#
# * Build-Depends on default-jdk-builddep. Closes: #477858
package eclipse-efj eclipse-jdt eclipse-platform libswt3.2-gtk-jni eclipse-sdk
eclipse-rcp eclipse-source
On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 12:20:25AM +0100, peter green wrote:
tags 478503 +patch
thanks
to fix this bug add
chmod 755 src/native/unix/configure
to the beggining of the configure-stamp target in debian/rules.
No, thats the wrong solution. Problem is that configure script was not
deleted
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 08:30:24AM +0200, Marcus Better wrote:
Seems this file was re-introduced by accident (?) in 5.5.25-1.
Yes, by accident, damn. Do you have time to fix this today? Then we do
an upload tonite. We need to fix the startup problem too.
Cheers,
Michael
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 10:16:25AM +0200, Marcus Better wrote:
Michael Koch wrote:
Yes, by accident, damn. Do you have time to fix this today?
Probably not, sorry - I'm extremely tied up with work at the moment.
No problem. I will take care of this issue.
Cheers,
Michael
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 10:02:03AM +0200, Thomas Girard wrote:
Hello Matthias,
Le vendredi 25 avril 2008 à 18:36 +0200, Matthias Klose a écrit :
gij/gcj and java-gcj-compat are not available (anymore) on the following
architectures: alpha, arm, hppa and hurd-i386.
This package has
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.26
#
# maven2 (2.0.9-1) unstable; urgency=low
#
# * Added bash-completion file (Closes: #477443).
package maven2
tags 477443 + pending
___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 03:26:18PM +0200, Thomas Huriaux wrote:
Hi,
Michael Koch [EMAIL PROTECTED] (24/04/2008):
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 07:15:14PM +0300, Moshe Gorohovsky wrote:
Tomcat 5.5.26-1 can not start.
Running /etc/init.d/tomcat5.5 start yelds following
lines in /var/log
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.25
#
# libpgjava (8.2-504-3) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
#
# * Removed libpgjava transitional package. Closes: #477557
#
package libpg-java libpgjava
tags 477557 + pending
___
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 09:03:17PM +0200, Thomas Huriaux wrote:
Michael Koch [EMAIL PROTECTED] (24/04/2008):
Before applying any patch I would like to be able to reproduce the
issue. What did you actually did in which order and which java packages
are installed? Did you installed tomcat5.5
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 06:48:44PM +0200, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
Hello,
Joerg Jaspert wrote:
You are moving from contrib to main - please make sure to include the
upstream source tarball in this move, using -sa flag when building the
package. Otherwise the source goes missing.
1 - 100 of 547 matches
Mail list logo
