Processing control commands:
tag -1 patch, pending
Bug #657281 [fop] src/java/org/apache/fop/pdf/ sRGB Color Space Profile.icm is
non-free
Added tag(s) pending and patch.
--
657281: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=657281
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
, and you may need to re-add them.
Bug reopened
No longer marked as fixed in versions lucene-solr/3.6.2+dfsg-4.
reassign -1 libjetty8-extra-java
Bug #740596 [solr-jetty] java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
org/apache/tomcat/util/descriptor/LocalResolver
Bug reassigned from package 'solr-jetty
Processing control commands:
severity -1 normal
Bug #767051 [libjinput-java] libjinput-java: uninstallable on kfreebsd
Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious'
--
767051: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=767051
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with
Processing control commands:
forcemerge 657771 767051
Bug #657771 [src:jinput] jinput: FTBFS(!linux):
Unable to merge bugs because:
package of #767051 is 'libjinput-java' not 'src:jinput'
Failed to forcibly merge 657771: Did not alter merged bugs
--
657771:
Processing control commands:
forcemerge 683854 767112
Bug #683854 {Done: James Page james.p...@ubuntu.com} [solr-jetty] solr-jetty:
Broken symlink to solr's webapp
Bug #696347 {Done: James Page james.p...@ubuntu.com} [solr-jetty] solr-jetty:
Symlink in /var/lib/jetty/webapps point to
Le 24/10/2014 14:30, David Schmitz a écrit :
could you please ramp up the maven package it outdated.
Hi David,
I started working on this upgrade but it's far from trivial
unfortunately, the build breaks badly. If someone wants to get a look I
committed my work in the maven-3.1.1 branch of the
=cdcd6ca706360329b2252bc8ec11f32b7424da11
New key, so next uploads seen as NEW uploads?
Or given [0] lists old fingerprint, should i re-ask to all DDs who
have granted me DM rights in the past to do that again? I thought
(hoped) it would have been automatic.
[0] https://ftp-master.debian.org/dm.txt
--
G..e
__
This is the maintainer
/keyring.git/commit/?id=cdcd6ca706360329b2252bc8ec11f32b7424da11
New key, so next uploads seen as NEW uploads?
Or given [0] lists old fingerprint, should i re-ask to all DDs who
have granted me DM rights in the past to do that again? I thought
(hoped) it would have been automatic.
It's not (yet
to a stronger key few days ago.
See
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/keyring/keyring.git/commit/?id=cdcd6ca706360329b2252bc8ec11f32b7424da11
New key, so next uploads seen as NEW uploads?
Or given [0] lists old fingerprint, should i re-ask to all DDs who
have granted me DM rights in the past to do
Processing control commands:
reassign -1 solr-jetty
Bug #740596 [libtomcat6-java] java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
org/apache/tomcat/util/descriptor/LocalResolver
Bug reassigned from package 'libtomcat6-java' to 'solr-jetty'.
No longer marked as found in versions tomcat6/6.0.39-1.
Ignoring
Processing control commands:
tags -1 + wontfix
Bug #554853 [jetty] jetty: Jetty is unable to run on port 80
Added tag(s) wontfix.
close -1
Bug #554853 [jetty] jetty: Jetty is unable to run on port 80
Marked Bug as done
--
554853: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=554853
Debian
Processing control commands:
severity -1 serious
Bug #764241 [openjfx] libopenjfx-java is arch: all but installs amd64 files
Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal'
tags -1 + sid jessie
Bug #764241 [openjfx] libopenjfx-java is arch: all but installs amd64 files
Added tag(s) sid and jessie.
--
Processing control commands:
tags -1 + pending
Bug #765397 [src:openjfx] please support architectures other than x86
Added tag(s) pending.
--
765397: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=765397
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
__
This is the
Processing control commands:
fixed -1 2.6.2-1
Bug #752962 [libopensaml2-java] libopensaml2-java: FTBFS - missing artifact
org.opensaml:opensaml:jar:2.6.2-SNAPSHOT
Marked as fixed in versions libopensaml2-java/2.6.2-1.
close -1
Bug #752962 [libopensaml2-java] libopensaml2-java: FTBFS - missing
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 761171 patch
Bug #761171 [src:wagon2] wagon2 fails to build in a non networked environment
Added tag(s) patch.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
761171:
Processing control commands:
tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #275872 [ant] ant's xslt task fails with JDK 1.5.0 with a NoSuchMethodError
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
275872: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=275872
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
__
Processing control commands:
tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #275872 [ant] ant's xslt task fails with JDK 1.5.0 with a NoSuchMethodError
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #275872 to the same tags previously set
--
275872: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=275872
Debian Bug Tracking
Processing control commands:
reassign -1 src:easymock
Bug #763646 [src:sisu-ioc] sisu-ioc: FTBFS due to missing maven artifact
Bug reassigned from package 'src:sisu-ioc' to 'src:easymock'.
No longer marked as found in versions sisu-ioc/2.3.0-5.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug
On 25.09.2014 15:00, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
Hi Timo,
almost done, the file xmldsig-core-schema.xsd is not under ASL but W3C
Software License.
oh dear.. fixed and uploaded again!
--
t
__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
On Thu, 25 Sep 2014, Christoph Biedl wrote:
Raphael Hertzog wrote...
For Squeeze LTS, we can't really remove a single binary package with an
update since the update leaves in its own squeeze-lts repository and this
would not remove the package in the main squeeze repo.
To me, this
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 759643 + wontfix
Bug #759643 [src:jetty8] jetty8: Please replace dependencies on tomcat7 with
tomcat8
Added tag(s) wontfix.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
759643:
Hi Emmanuel,
On Mon, 22 Sep 2014, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Glasshfish is an important package for the Java ecosystem as it provides
JavaEE specification APIs used to build many other packages.
The CVEs reported are most likely related to the complete application
server which is almost unused
Le 23/09/2014 10:17, Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
This looks like a possible compromise (although the lack of init script
doesn't mean that nobody can use it, it's always possible to start it from
a custom script).
Ok I'll drop the glassfish-appserv package in the next upload. I agree
it may be
Le 22/09/2014 17:44, Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
If there are no objections, I'll file a bug against
debian-security-support to request this. CC to the security team in case
they want to request the same for Wheezy.
Hi Raphael,
Glasshfish is an important package for the Java ecosystem as it
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
noowner 758972
Bug #758972 [mojarra] Please remove mojarra
Removed annotation that Bug was owned by Markus Koschany a...@gambaru.de.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
758972:
Processing control commands:
severity -1 normal
Bug #761305 [leiningen] RM: leiningen -- obsolete
Severity set to 'normal' from 'important'
retitle -1 RM: leiningen: RoM; obsolete; request from upstream
Bug #761305 [leiningen] RM: leiningen -- obsolete
Changed Bug title to 'RM: leiningen: RoM;
Processing control commands:
fixed -1 2.45-1
Bug #761546 [src:jenkins-remoting] jenkins-remoting: FTBFS: Missing required
artifact: org.jvnet.hudson:test-annotations:jar:debian
Marked as fixed in versions jenkins-remoting/2.45-1.
close -1
Bug #761546 [src:jenkins-remoting] jenkins-remoting:
Processing control commands:
reassign -1 src:imagemagick
Bug #761550 [src:sunflow] sunflow: FTBFS: convert: unable to open file
`/tmp/magick-25279uk8HYnu9HiFf': No such file or directory @
error/constitute.c/ReadImage/540.
Bug reassigned from package 'src:sunflow' to 'src:imagemagick'.
No
Processing control commands:
tags 749957 + patch
Bug #749957 [lwjgl] lwjgl: FTBFS - build-conflicts binutils-gold (which
binutils provides)
Added tag(s) patch.
--
749957: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=749957
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with
Processing control commands:
tags -1 + patch
Bug #760877 [libjackson2-annotations-java] libjackson2-annotations-java: Should
provide jackson-annotations-2.x.pom
Added tag(s) patch.
--
760877: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=760877
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
On 03.09.2014 12:51, Debian FTP Masters wrote:
No target suite found. Please check your target distribution and that you
uploaded to the right archive.
Huh? The second upload should be fine..
--
t
__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
On 09/03/2014 11:52, Timo Aaltonen wrote:
On 03.09.2014 12:51, Debian FTP Masters wrote:
No target suite found. Please check your target distribution and that you
uploaded to the right archive.
Huh? The second upload should be fine..
What does the Distribution field of the .changes you
On 03.09.2014 13:00, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
On 09/03/2014 11:52, Timo Aaltonen wrote:
On 03.09.2014 12:51, Debian FTP Masters wrote:
No target suite found. Please check your target distribution and that you
uploaded to the right archive.
Huh? The second upload should be fine..
What does
Hi Tony,
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 05:38:01PM -0700, tony mancill wrote:
On 08/28/2014 07:01 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
Hi,
when checking my Maintainer dashboard dashboard I realised that the
watch file of netlib-java and libmtj-java became disfunctional and when
tracking down the issue I
On 18.08.2014 19:00, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
Dear Maintainer,
unfortunately I have to reject your package.
Files in fastinfoset/pkg/SUNWfastinfoset/* contain a statement:
# Copyright 2004 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All rights reserved.
# Use is subject to license terms.
(maybe there
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
block 759899 by 736644
Bug #759899 [src:elasticsearch] elasticsearch: FTBFS: build-dependency not
installable: liblucene4-java
759899 was not blocked by any bugs.
759899 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 759899: 736644
thanks
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 02:38:20AM -0300, Miguel Landaeta wrote:
Hi Paul, thanks for reviewing this package.
I already addressed this issue and uploaded a new release.
Please take a look at groovy2/2.2.2+dfsg-3 when you have a chance.
Sweet, thanks Miguel!
Marked for ACCEPT!
Thanks for
Le 29/08/2014 03:56, Paul Richards Tagliamonte a écrit :
E: openjdk-7-jre-dcevm source: build-depends-on-obsolete-package
build-depends: hardening-wrapper = use dpkg-buildflags instead
Appears valid
You should address this.
Thank you for the review Paul, I'll look into this for the next
On 08/28/2014 07:01 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
Hi,
when checking my Maintainer dashboard dashboard I realised that the
watch file of netlib-java and libmtj-java became disfunctional and when
tracking down the issue I noticed that both projects moved from SF to
Github. While I updated the
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 04:00:07AM +, Paul Richards Tagliamonte wrote:
Howdy maintainer,
Your debian/patches are GPL-2. Upstream is apache2. These licenses
are not compatable.
Please relicense those patches to GPL-3+ or apache2.
Hi Paul, thanks for reviewing this package.
I already
Le 26/08/2014 01:22, Miguel Landaeta a écrit :
Are you OK with me updating it to 1.5.2?
I prepared the update on alioth if you want to sponsor the upload.
Emmanuel Bourg
__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 08:54:29AM +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Le 26/08/2014 01:22, Miguel Landaeta a écrit :
Are you OK with me updating it to 1.5.2?
I prepared the update on alioth if you want to sponsor the upload.
I'll do it. Thanks.
--
Miguel Landaeta, nomadium at debian.org
Hi Miguel,
I already packaged Javamail earlier this year, it has just been accepted
in the archive yesterday:
https://packages.qa.debian.org/j/javamail.html
Emmanuel Bourg
Le 25/08/2014 19:04, Debian FTP Masters a écrit :
binary:libjavamail-api-java is NEW.
binary:libjavamail-api-java-doc
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 09:37:19PM +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Hi Miguel,
I already packaged Javamail earlier this year, it has just been accepted
in the archive yesterday:
Hi Emmanuel,
Thanks for pointing this out. I guess I looked it for JavaMail classes
everywhere but I forgot to look
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 05:04:43PM +, Debian FTP Masters wrote:
binary:libjavamail-api-java is NEW.
binary:libjavamail-api-java-doc is NEW.
source:libjavamail-api-java is NEW.
Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action
from the ftpteam to process. The
On Wed, 22 Jan 2014 13:02:39 +0100 Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu wrote:
Hi Steven,
If the libjogl-java dependency is dropped, king should be installable on
kfreebsd and then so would qiime. And libjogl2-java transition can go
ahead.
Most probably this would be the most simple solution.
Hi,
On 10/08/14 14:33, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
I would like to remove jogl v1 for Jessie and it is the last package
using it.
I still think qiime's libjogl-java dependency can be dropped; with
openjdk-7 at least, graphics rendering seems more than fast enough
without it.
Regards,
--
Steven
Hi Steven,
On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 04:24:54PM +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
On 10/08/14 14:33, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
I would like to remove jogl v1 for Jessie and it is the last package
using it.
I still think qiime's libjogl-java dependency can be dropped; with
openjdk-7 at least,
Hi Andreas,
On 10/08/14 17:28, Andreas Tille wrote:
It would be more than welcome to drop libjogl-java but can you send us a
patch to get rid of this dependency. This would be really appreciated.
Actually the dependency is qiime - king - libjogl-java
The attached patch is all that's needed
Hi.
Il 06/08/2014 00:06, Emmanuel Bourg ha scritto:
Le 05/08/2014 23:55, Giovanni Mascellani a écrit :
For what it's worth, I'm inclined to think that the fix to #688043
should be ported to stable and then the affected packages should be
rebuilt. But this is a decision that competes to
?
They'll move license.txt to the path pointed by headers, so it'll be
fixed upstream in a future release.
another revision of xsom got re-uploaded, could you have another look?
Ping? It's been a while, and xsom is a blocker for the next set of
packages..
--
t
__
This is the maintainer
Le 05/08/2014 23:55, Giovanni Mascellani a écrit :
For what it's worth, I'm inclined to think that the fix to #688043
should be ported to stable and then the affected packages should be
rebuilt. But this is a decision that competes to maven-debian-helper
maintainers.
I haven't studied this
Processing control commands:
reassign -1 src:openjdk-6
Bug #747506 [libsikuli-script-java] openjdk-6: cannot load
libsikuli-script-java any more
Bug reassigned from package 'libsikuli-script-java' to 'src:openjdk-6'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #747506 to the same values
Processing control commands:
reassign -1 libsikuli-script-java
Bug #747506 [src:openjdk-6] openjdk-6: cannot load libsikuli-script-java any
more
Bug reassigned from package 'src:openjdk-6' to 'libsikuli-script-java'.
No longer marked as found in versions openjdk-6/6b31-1.13.3-1~deb7u1.
Ignoring
Control: reassign -1 libxmltooling-java-doc
On Jo, 31 iul 14, 13:00:14, Stephen Nelson wrote:
Source: libxmltooling-java-doc
Followup-For: Bug #756610
Please find a patch attached.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Processing control commands:
reassign -1 libxmltooling-java-doc
Bug #756610 [src:libxmltooling-java-doc] libxmltooling-java-doc: Short
description does not sufficiently describe package function
Warning: Unknown package 'src:libxmltooling-java-doc'
Bug reassigned from package
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
unarchive 745897
Bug #745897 {Done: Hideki Yamane henr...@debian.org} [libstruts1.2-java]
libstruts1.2-java: CVE-2014-0114
Unarchived Bug 745897
2014-06-16 20:27 GMT+09:00 Emmanuel Bourg ebo...@apache.org:
Unknown command or malformed arguments
Processing control commands:
tags -1 + pending
Bug #719842 [javahelper] javahelper: jh_linkjars doesn't support -N
Added tag(s) pending.
--
719842: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=719842
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
__
This is the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin - do you run ibus currently? I finally managed to demonstrate
it was ibus buggering up Freeplane (why just Freeplane...) -
I am resending ths mail because I first sent it before I was registered to
the list.
If it arrived twice: sorry!
On Tue, 01 Jul 2014 11:57:56 +0200, amedee.vanga...@itextpdf.com wrote:
Hi! Two months ago I started as QA Engineer at iText, and I'm a Linux
user
since at least the last century,
Le 01/07/2014 11:57, amedee.vanga...@itextpdf.com a écrit :
Feel free to tell me how I can help!
Hi Amedee,
Welcome and thank you for offering your help. I'm cc-ing
debian-j...@lists.debian.org since this is where we discuss Java related
topics, the pkg-java-maintainers list is only used for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Package: freeplane
Version: 1.2.23+dfsg1-1
Hi,
as written on another thread, it would be good to know if you can
reproduce the issue with another Java application like jedit
(packaged in Debian). This way we would know if it's a Java or
OmegaPhil omegaphi...@startmail.com writes:
On 28/06/14 12:02, OmegaPhil wrote:
Package: freeplane Version: 1.2.23+dfsg1-1
Hi,
as written on another thread, it would be good to know if you can
reproduce the issue with another Java application like jedit
(packaged in Debian). This way
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 28/06/14 16:19, Felix Natter wrote:
OmegaPhil omegaphi...@startmail.com writes:
On 28/06/14 12:02, OmegaPhil wrote:
Package: freeplane Version: 1.2.23+dfsg1-1
Hi,
as written on another thread, it would be good to know if you
can
20.06.2014 16:14, Thorsten Alteholz kirjoitti:
Hi Timo,
On Fri, 20 Jun 2014, Timo Aaltonen wrote:
The file header also says:
# When distributing the software, include this License Header Notice
in each
# file and include the License file at packager/legal/LICENSE.txt.
Well, to me it
On Mon, 23 Jun 2014, Timo Aaltonen wrote:
Actually, all package.html that I can find do have that header but in
html comment format.. did you mean some other files and if so, which ones?
Ooops, sorry, I meant those files, but the file viewer stripped the html
comment here.
So only
23.06.2014 13:51, Thorsten Alteholz kirjoitti:
On Mon, 23 Jun 2014, Timo Aaltonen wrote:
Actually, all package.html that I can find do have that header but in
html comment format.. did you mean some other files and if so, which
ones?
Ooops, sorry, I meant those files, but the file
Processing control commands:
severity -1 minor
Bug #735227 [activemq] [activemq] Non sourced jquery
Severity set to 'minor' from 'serious'
--
735227: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=735227
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
__
This is the
Hi Timo,
On Fri, 20 Jun 2014, Timo Aaltonen wrote:
The file header also says:
# When distributing the software, include this License Header Notice in each
# file and include the License file at packager/legal/LICENSE.txt.
Well, to me it sounds like that path is just wrong and it attempts to
19.06.2014 19:00, Thorsten Alteholz kirjoitti:
Dear Maintainer,
unfortunately I have to reject your package.
According to your GPL-2 license block in debian/copyright, the software
is licensed under:
either version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
This seems to
Hi Emmanuel,
On Thu, 12 Jun 2014, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Le 12/06/2014 14:18, Thorsten Alteholz a écrit :
the license of some files says that:
You are granted a license to use, reproduce and create derivative works
of this document.
Can you please explain why Debian is allowed to distribute
Hi Thorsten,
Le 12/06/2014 14:18, Thorsten Alteholz a écrit :
the license of some files says that:
You are granted a license to use, reproduce and create derivative works
of this document.
Can you please explain why Debian is allowed to distribute these files?
Because the license grants
On 06/12/2014 11:17 AM, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
Hi Emmanuel,
On Thu, 12 Jun 2014, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Le 12/06/2014 14:18, Thorsten Alteholz a écrit :
the license of some files says that:
You are granted a license to use, reproduce and create derivative works
of this document.
Can
Hi,
On 30/05/14 18:33, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
Hi Matthew,
I marked your package for accept now, but please take care of:
W: libowasp-antisamy-java: copyright-refers-to-deprecated-bsd-license-file
I've pushed a fix for this, but it doesn't seem worth minting a new
package version for
On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 08:40:59PM +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
On Sat, 31 May 2014 07:37:56 +0200
Emmanuel Bourg ebo...@apache.org wrote:
Thank you for the fix. Could you also commit your changes on alioth please?
OK, committed. Thank you for your notice, Emmanuel :)
When committed,
Le 01/06/2014 21:36, tony mancill a écrit :
Regarding switching to git, there was some push-back when it was
proposed to do this for all pkg-java packages, so the migration is
happening package-by-package. As long as the maintainers listed
in Uploaders are not opposed, feel free to convert
On Sat, 31 May 2014 07:37:56 +0200
Emmanuel Bourg ebo...@apache.org wrote:
Thank you for the fix. Could you also commit your changes on alioth please?
OK, committed. Thank you for your notice, Emmanuel :)
When committed,
Warning: post-commit FS processing had error 'attempt to write a
Hi Hideki,
Thank you for the fix. Could you also commit your changes on alioth please?
Thank you,
Emmanuel Bourg
Le 31/05/2014 06:18, Debian FTP Masters a écrit :
Accepted:
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 31 May 2014 12:28:56 +0900
Source: libstruts1.2-java
Binary: libstruts1.2-java
Hi,
On 22/05/14 14:00, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
Some js-files are licensed under MIT, GPL or Apache-2. These licenses are
not mentioned in debian/copyright.
Please also remove all minified js-files where no sources are provided.
Right, I understand the problem now, and I'd like some advice,
Hi,
On 22/05/14 14:00, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
For example src/test/resources/log4j.dtd is licensed under Apache-2,
which is not mentioned in debian/coypright.
There might be other licenses missing!
Well spotted; I rashly belived upstream's LICENSE-README :-/. I did some
grepping and just
On 30/05/14 10:32, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Le 30/05/2014 11:11, Matthew Vernon a écrit :
What would you prefer? i) has the advantages of leaving the source as
upstream have it in their SVN ; ii) is perhaps the right compromise
option; iii) seems too extreme.
IMHO if the minified JavaScript
Le 30/05/2014 11:11, Matthew Vernon a écrit :
What would you prefer? i) has the advantages of leaving the source as
upstream have it in their SVN ; ii) is perhaps the right compromise
option; iii) seems too extreme.
IMHO if the minified JavaScript files are only test objects they should
be
Le 30/05/2014 11:37, Matthew Vernon a écrit :
It's difficult to determine what license they might be covered by;
AFAICT they are the result of pointing something like wget at a bunch of
sites, namely: cnn.com, deadspin.com, fark.com, google.com,
microsoft.com, slashdot.org
In this case I
On 30/05/14 10:47, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Le 30/05/2014 11:37, Matthew Vernon a écrit :
It's difficult to determine what license they might be covered by;
AFAICT they are the result of pointing something like wget at a bunch of
sites, namely: cnn.com, deadspin.com, fark.com, google.com,
Processing control commands:
reassign -1 libtomcat6-java
Bug #749364 [lucene-solr] lucene-solr: FTBFS - java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
org/apache/tomcat/util/descriptor/LocalResolver
Bug reassigned from package 'lucene-solr' to 'libtomcat6-java'.
No longer marked as found in versions
Processing control commands:
tags -1 +unreproducible
Bug #747054 [eclipse] FTBFS: package javax.servlet.http does not exist
Added tag(s) unreproducible.
--
747054: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=747054
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
__
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
severity 638001 normal
Bug #638001 [maven-debian-helper] [maven-debian-helper] mh_resolve_dependencies
could avoid to search POMs provided by this package
Severity set to 'normal' from 'minor'
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 728524 + wontfix
Bug #728524 [gradle] gradle: Groovy 2.1.x breaks Gradle
Added tag(s) wontfix.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
728524: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=728524
Processing control commands:
severity -1 normal
Bug #747362 [tuxguitar] tuxguitar: java sound api cannot be loaded
Severity set to 'normal' from 'grave'
--
747362: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=747362
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
__
On 05/01/2014 04:49 PM, Christopher Ainsley wrote:
Hello,
I'm one of the principle committers on JavaCC, and I wanted to ask the
procedure to have the debian JavaCC package updated to the latest
version of JavaCC, 6.1.0.
JavaCC is now live here:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 746253 + pending
Bug #746253 [groovy] groovy: groovy-all.jar is broken due changes introduced
with jarjar 1.4
Added tag(s) pending.
tags 744337 + pending
Bug #744337 [src:gradle] gradle: FTBFS: java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap
space
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
owner 745815 !
Bug #745815 [libjarjar-java] libjarjar-java: generate jars with invalid
information
Owner recorded as Miguel Landaeta nomad...@debian.org.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
745815:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
clone 744330 -1
Bug #744330 [groovy] groovy: makes xbmc FTBFS
Bug 744330 cloned as bug 746253
746253 was not blocked by any bugs.
746253 was blocking: 743558
Added blocking bug(s) of 746253: 743558
retitle -1 groovy: groovy-all.jar is broken due
Processing control commands:
severity -1 important
Bug #742405 [src:zookeeper] zookeeper: ftbfs when gcj is default jdk
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
--
742405: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=742405
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with
On 04/24/2014 11:34 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Le 25/04/2014 07:03, Debian FTP Masters a écrit :
Version check failed:
Your upload included the binary package libjibx-java, version 1.1.6a-4, for
all,
however oldstable already has version 1.2.1-1.
Uploads to unstable must have a higher
Le 25/04/2014 07:03, Debian FTP Masters a écrit :
Version check failed:
Your upload included the binary package libjibx-java, version 1.1.6a-4, for
all,
however oldstable already has version 1.2.1-1.
Uploads to unstable must have a higher version than present in oldstable.
Hi Tony,
I just
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
severity 719842 important
Bug #719842 [javahelper] javahelper: jh_linkjars doesn't support -N
Severity set to 'important' from 'normal'
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
719842:
severity 719842 important
thanks
Dixi quod…
On Mon, 19 Aug 2013, Ondřej Surý wrote:
But feel free to send a patch.
It is indeed a bug in javahelper that occurs when an architecture
has !GCJ_NATIVE_ARCHS but also !JAVA_BROKEN_ARCHS.
This is actually the proper patch:
---
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 733234 + moreinfo
Bug #733234 [groovy] Groovy fails with groovy.lang.MissingMethodException
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
733234:
On 04/16/2014 09:20 PM, Debian FTP Masters wrote:
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 20:54:50 -0700
Source: service-wrapper-java
Binary: service-wrapper libservice-wrapper-java libservice-wrapper-jni
libservice-wrapper-doc
Architecture: source amd64 all
Version: 3.5.22-3
Distribution: unstable
601 - 700 of 2299 matches
Mail list logo
