[Git][java-team/jruby-joni][master] 5 commits: re-enable sunday search logic

[Hideki Yamane (@henrich)]

Hideki Yamane pushed to branch master at Debian Java Maintainers / jruby-joni


Commits:
2f859a47 by Thomas E. Enebo at 2023-01-20T13:46:45-06:00
re-enable sunday search logic

- - - - -
f199bb3d by Thomas E. Enebo at 2023-01-23T10:07:40-06:00
[maven-release-plugin] prepare release joni-2.1.45

- - - - -
425dd275 by Thomas E. Enebo at 2023-01-23T10:07:43-06:00
[maven-release-plugin] prepare for next development iteration

- - - - -
ccd20556 by Thomas E. Enebo at 2023-01-26T13:02:45-06:00
Revert synchronize another label

This reverts commit 39d8c21144de747bb9e2ba0753818dbe2cf136eb.

- - - - -
f5b330d4 by Thomas E. Enebo at 2023-01-26T17:12:51-06:00
Minor porting error noticed with onigmo

- - - - -


3 changed files:

- pom.xml
- src/org/joni/Matcher.java
- src/org/joni/Regex.java


Changes:

=
pom.xml
=
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
   org.jruby.joni
   joni
   jar
-  2.1.45-SNAPSHOT
+  2.1.46-SNAPSHOT
   Joni
   
 Java port of Oniguruma: http://www.geocities.jp/kosako3/oniguruma


=
src/org/joni/Matcher.java
=
@@ -340,11 +340,9 @@ public abstract class Matcher extends IntHolder {
 // !begin_position:!
 if (range > start) {
 if (gpos > start) {
-if (gpos < range) {
-range = gpos + 1;
-} else {
-range = start + 1;
-}
+if (gpos < range) range = gpos + 1;
+} else {
+range = start + 1;
 }
 } else {
 range = start;
@@ -390,11 +388,9 @@ public abstract class Matcher extends IntHolder {
 // goto !begin_position;!
 if (range > start) {
 if (gpos > start) {
-if (gpos < range) {
-range = gpos + 1;
-} else {
-range = start + 1;
-}
+if (gpos < range) range = gpos + 1;
+} else {
+range = start + 1;
 }
 } else {
 range = start;


=
src/org/joni/Regex.java
=
@@ -351,11 +351,11 @@ public final class Regex {
 if (e.ignoreCase > 0) {
 if (e.length >= 3 || (e.length >= 2 && allowReverse)) {
 forward = enc.toLowerCaseTable() != null ? 
Search.SLOW_IC_SB_FORWARD : Search.SLOW_IC_FORWARD;
-//if (!setupBMSkipMap(true)) {
-//forward = allowReverse ? Search.BM_IC_FORWARD : 
Search.BM_NOT_REV_IC_FORWARD;
-//} else {
-//forward = enc.toLowerCaseTable() != null ? 
Search.SLOW_IC_SB_FORWARD : Search.SLOW_IC_FORWARD;
-//}
+if (!setupBMSkipMap(true)) {
+forward = allowReverse ? Search.BM_IC_FORWARD : 
Search.BM_NOT_REV_IC_FORWARD;
+} else {
+forward = enc.toLowerCaseTable() != null ? 
Search.SLOW_IC_SB_FORWARD : Search.SLOW_IC_FORWARD;
+}
 } else {
 forward = enc.toLowerCaseTable() != null ? 
Search.SLOW_IC_SB_FORWARD : Search.SLOW_IC_FORWARD;
 }



View it on GitLab: 
https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/jruby-joni/-/compare/6d35fcab24332f131449b5eee04c15158214b910...f5b330d456da08b949b3e3556a5723fd4176735c

-- 
View it on GitLab: 
https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/jruby-joni/-/compare/6d35fcab24332f131449b5eee04c15158214b910...f5b330d456da08b949b3e3556a5723fd4176735c
You're receiving this email because of your account on salsa.debian.org.


___
pkg-java-commits mailing list
pkg-java-comm...@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-commits

Processed: Re: Bug#893252: libjdbm-java FTBFS with openjdk-9

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> tags -1 + wontfix
Bug #893252 [src:libjdbm-java] libjdbm-java FTBFS with openjdk-9
Added tag(s) wontfix.

-- 
893252: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=893252
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: libhibernate3-java FTBFS with openjdk-9

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #893240 [src:libhibernate3-java] libhibernate3-java FTBFS with openjdk-9
Added tag(s) confirmed.

-- 
893240: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=893240
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re:

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tags 895587 patch
Bug #895587 [openjdk-10] openjdk-10: exclude element-list from being compressed
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 895234 patch
Bug #895234 [src:libcommons-lang3-java] libcommons-lang3-java: update for 
OpenJDK 10
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #895234 to the same tags previously set
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
895234: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=895234
895587: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=895587
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re:

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> affects 895234 -surefire
Bug #895234 [src:libcommons-lang3-java] libcommons-lang3-java: update for 
OpenJDK 10
Removed indication that 895234 affects surefire
> affects 895234 libsurefire-java
Bug #895234 [src:libcommons-lang3-java] libcommons-lang3-java: update for 
OpenJDK 10
Added indication that 895234 affects libsurefire-java
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
895234: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=895234
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re:

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> affects 895234 libmaven-javadoc-plugin-java
Bug #895234 [src:libcommons-lang3-java] libcommons-lang3-java: update for 
OpenJDK 10
Added indication that 895234 affects libmaven-javadoc-plugin-java
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
895234: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=895234
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re:

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> clone 895234 -1
Bug #895234 [src:libcommons-lang3-java] libcommons-lang3-java: update for 
OpenJDK 10 and OpenJDK 11
Bug 895234 cloned as bug 895585
895583 was blocked by: 895234
895583 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 895583: 895585
> retitle 895234 libcommons-lang3-java: update for OpenJDK 10
Bug #895234 [src:libcommons-lang3-java] libcommons-lang3-java: update for 
OpenJDK 10 and OpenJDK 11
Changed Bug title to 'libcommons-lang3-java: update for OpenJDK 10' from 
'libcommons-lang3-java: update for OpenJDK 10 and OpenJDK 11'.
> retitle -1 libcommons-lang3-java: update for OpenJDK 11
Bug #895585 [src:libcommons-lang3-java] libcommons-lang3-java: update for 
OpenJDK 10 and OpenJDK 11
Changed Bug title to 'libcommons-lang3-java: update for OpenJDK 11' from 
'libcommons-lang3-java: update for OpenJDK 10 and OpenJDK 11'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
895234: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=895234
895583: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=895583
895585: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=895585
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re:

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> block 895583 by 895234
Bug #895583 [libcommons-lang3-java] libcommons-lang3-java FTBFS due to 
unsupported locale type
895583 was not blocked by any bugs.
895583 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 895583: 895234
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
895583: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=895583
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: groovy: GCJ java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> tags -1 + wontfix
Bug #877799 [groovy] groovy: GCJ java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException
Added tag(s) wontfix.
> close -1
Bug #877799 [groovy] groovy: GCJ java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException
Marked Bug as done

-- 
877799: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=877799
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: Bug#893251: jabref 3.8 is started with OpenJDK 9 instead of 8

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> tag -1 + pending
Bug #893251 [jabref] jabref: doesn't start with liblog4j2-java 2.10.0-1
Bug #894106 [jabref] jabref: fails to start with java-8-openjdk-amd64
Added tag(s) pending.
Added tag(s) pending.

-- 
893251: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=893251
894106: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=894106
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: maven-debian-helper FTBFS with openjdk-9

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> reassign 893343 maven-ant-helper
Bug #893343 [src:maven-debian-helper] maven-debian-helper FTBFS with openjdk-9
Bug reassigned from package 'src:maven-debian-helper' to 'maven-ant-helper'.
No longer marked as found in versions maven-debian-helper/2.3~exp1.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #893343 to the same values 
previously set
> affects 893343 maven-debian-helper
Bug #893343 [maven-ant-helper] maven-debian-helper FTBFS with openjdk-9
Added indication that 893343 affects maven-debian-helper
>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
893343: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=893343
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: libdtdparser-java FTBFS with openjdk-9

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tags 893230 + wontfix
Bug #893230 [src:libdtdparser-java] libdtdparser-java FTBFS with openjdk-9
Added tag(s) wontfix.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
893230: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=893230
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: libsmali-java FTBFS with openjdk-9

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> reassign 894331 src:proguard
Bug #894331 [src:libsmali-java] libsmali-java FTBFS with openjdk-9
Bug reassigned from package 'src:libsmali-java' to 'src:proguard'.
No longer marked as found in versions libsmali-java/2.2.2-1.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #894331 to the same values 
previously set
> forcemerge 894330 894331
Bug #894330 [src:proguard] apktool FTBFS with openjdk-9
Bug #894331 [src:proguard] libsmali-java FTBFS with openjdk-9
Merged 894330 894331
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
894330: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=894330
894331: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=894331
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: apktool FTBFS with openjdk-9

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> reassign -1 src:proguard
Bug #894330 [src:apktool] apktool FTBFS with openjdk-9
Bug reassigned from package 'src:apktool' to 'src:proguard'.
No longer marked as found in versions apktool/2.3.1+dfsg-1.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #894330 to the same values 
previously set

-- 
894330: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=894330
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: libcodemodel-java: circular dependency hell

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> reassign -1 libistack-commons-java
Bug #877919 [libcodemodel-java] libcodemodel-java: circular dependency hell
Bug reassigned from package 'libcodemodel-java' to 'libistack-commons-java'.
No longer marked as found in versions libcodemodel-java/2.6-1.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #877919 to the same values 
previously set
> affects -1 libcodemodel-java
Bug #877919 [libistack-commons-java] libcodemodel-java: circular dependency hell
Added indication that 877919 affects libcodemodel-java

-- 
877919: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=877919
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: dumbster FTBFS with openjdk-9

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> fixed 893141 1.6+debian-4
Bug #893141 [src:dumbster] dumbster FTBFS with openjdk-9
Marked as fixed in versions dumbster/1.6+debian-4.
> close 893141
Bug #893141 [src:dumbster] dumbster FTBFS with openjdk-9
Marked Bug as done
>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
893141: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=893141
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: FTBFS with Java 9: [gettext-dist] msgfmt returned 1

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> block -1 by 873705
Bug #874151 [src:plm] FTBFS with Java 9: [gettext-dist] msgfmt returned 1
874151 was blocked by: 892733
874151 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 874151: 873705

-- 
874151: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=874151
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: libstylebook-java: JPEG encoding is broken

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> tags -1 + wontfix
Bug #432677 [libstylebook-java] libstylebook-java: JPEG encoding is broken
Added tag(s) wontfix.
> close -1
Bug #432677 [libstylebook-java] libstylebook-java: JPEG encoding is broken
Marked Bug as done

-- 
432677: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=432677
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Bug#893382: closed by Markus Koschany <a...@debian.org> (Re: osgi-foundation-ee FTBFS with openjdk-9)

[Markus Koschany]

Am 28.03.2018 um 15:13 schrieb Adrian Bunk:
> Control: reopen -1
> 
>> Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 14:19:30 +0200
>> From: Markus Koschany <a...@debian.org>
>> To: 893382-d...@bugs.debian.org
>> Subject: Re: osgi-foundation-ee FTBFS with openjdk-9
>>
>> Building the package works for me. I'm going to upload a new revision
>> but I think this bug is already resolved.
> 
> Still happens for me, and also on the buildd:
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=osgi-foundation-ee=all=4.2.0-3=1522242580=0

Right. Apparently one of my chroots was not properly updated. This issue
is related to openjdk-9 bug

https://bugs.java.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=JDK-8186841

However they only consider the error handling of javadoc a bug (not
exiting gracefully), the "bad class file" is another story.

AFAICS osgi-foundation-ee uses identical class names and the same
namespace as several classes in the java.base module (src/java/util) and
OpenJDK 9 does not like that. Maybe --add-modules java.base might work
in this case?

We could also do the following. The only reverse-dependency of this
package is osgi-compendium. It appears it requires only some specific
class files to build correctly (namely javax.microedition.io.*" If this
is true we could move those classes into osgi-compendium and remove
osgi-foundation-ee from Debian. One package less to support.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
<http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers>. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Bug#893382: closed by Markus Koschany <a...@debian.org> (Re: osgi-foundation-ee FTBFS with openjdk-9)

[Adrian Bunk]

Control: reopen -1

> Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 14:19:30 +0200
> From: Markus Koschany <a...@debian.org>
> To: 893382-d...@bugs.debian.org
> Subject: Re: osgi-foundation-ee FTBFS with openjdk-9
> 
> Building the package works for me. I'm going to upload a new revision
> but I think this bug is already resolved.

Still happens for me, and also on the buildd:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=osgi-foundation-ee=all=4.2.0-3=1522242580=0

> Markus

cu
Adrian

-- 

   "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
   "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
   Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
<http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers>. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: Bug#893382 closed by Markus Koschany <a...@debian.org> (Re: osgi-foundation-ee FTBFS with openjdk-9)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> reopen -1
Bug #893382 {Done: Markus Koschany } [src:osgi-foundation-ee] 
osgi-foundation-ee FTBFS with openjdk-9
Bug reopened
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #893382 to the same values 
previously set

-- 
893382: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=893382
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: Bug#847428: Package the Entire "eclipse.jdt.core"

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> fixed -1 3.12.3-1
Bug #847428 [src:ecj] Package the Entire "eclipse.jdt.core"
Marked as fixed in versions ecj/3.12.3-1.
> close -1
Bug #847428 [src:ecj] Package the Entire "eclipse.jdt.core"
Marked Bug as done

-- 
847428: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=847428
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: jgit-cli: IllegalStateException: Cannot set value to a final field 'org.eclipse.jgit.pgm.Daemon.enable'

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> # renders package unusable
> severity 878800 grave
Bug #878800 [jgit-cli] jgit-cli: IllegalStateException: Cannot set value to a 
final field 'org.eclipse.jgit.pgm.Daemon.enable'
Severity set to 'grave' from 'important'
> quit
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
878800: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=878800
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: ant: Depends on GCJ which is going away

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> fixed -1 1.9.10-2
Bug #892528 [src:ant] ant: Depends on GCJ which is going away
Marked as fixed in versions ant/1.9.10-2.
> close -1
Bug #892528 [src:ant] ant: Depends on GCJ which is going away
Marked Bug as done

-- 
892528: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=892528
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: libecj-java-gcj: Not installable with /var on 9p (non-hdd) filesystem

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> tag -1 + wontfix
Bug #701951 [libecj-java-gcj] libecj-java-gcj: Not installable with /var on 9p 
(non-hdd) filesystem
Added tag(s) wontfix.
> close -1
Bug #701951 [libecj-java-gcj] libecj-java-gcj: Not installable with /var on 9p 
(non-hdd) filesystem
Marked Bug as done

-- 
701951: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=701951
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: Bug#894106: jabref: fails to start with java-8-openjdk-amd64

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> forcemerge 893251 -1
Bug #893251 [jabref] jabref: doesn't start with liblog4j2-java 2.10.0-1
Bug #894106 [jabref] jabref: fails to start with java-8-openjdk-amd64
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
Merged 893251 894106

-- 
893251: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=893251
894106: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=894106
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: maven-bundle-plugin FTBFS with libmaven-dependency-tree-java

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> forwarded -1 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-5795
Bug #880886 [src:maven-bundle-plugin] maven-bundle-plugin FTBFS with 
libmaven-dependency-tree-java 3.0.1-1
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 
'https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-5795'.

-- 
880886: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=880886
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: libswt-webkit-gtk-3-jni: Depend on libwebkitgtk-1.0-0 which is deprecated

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> severity -1 serious
Bug #880470 [libswt-webkit-gtk-3-jni] libswt-webkit-gtk-3-jni: Depend on 
libwebkitgtk-1.0-0 which is deprecated
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> block -1 by 893768
Bug #880470 [libswt-webkit-gtk-3-jni] libswt-webkit-gtk-3-jni: Depend on 
libwebkitgtk-1.0-0 which is deprecated
880470 was not blocked by any bugs.
880470 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 880470: 893768

-- 
880470: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=880470
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: activemq FTBFS with openjdk-9

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> clone 893236 -1
Bug #893236 [src:activemq] activemq FTBFS with openjdk-9
Bug 893236 cloned as bug 893558
> reassign -1 src:openjdk-9
Bug #893558 [src:activemq] activemq FTBFS with openjdk-9
Bug reassigned from package 'src:activemq' to 'src:openjdk-9'.
No longer marked as found in versions activemq/5.15.3-1.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #893558 to the same values 
previously set
> retitle -1 openjdk9: NullPointerException when building MethodSubHeader
Bug #893558 [src:openjdk-9] activemq FTBFS with openjdk-9
Changed Bug title to 'openjdk9: NullPointerException when building 
MethodSubHeader' from 'activemq FTBFS with openjdk-9'.
> forwarded -1 https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8199307
Bug #893558 [src:openjdk-9] openjdk9: NullPointerException when building 
MethodSubHeader
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 
'https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8199307'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
893236: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=893236
893558: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=893558
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Re: ant_1.9.10-2_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

[tony mancill]

On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 09:34:21AM +, Debian FTP Masters wrote:

> Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers 
> 
> Changed-By: Matthias Klose 
> Description:
>  ant- Java based build tool like make
>  ant-doc- Java based build tool like make - API documentation and manual
>  ant-optional - Java based build tool like make - optional libraries
> Changes:
>  ant (1.9.10-2) unstable; urgency=medium
>  .
>* Non maintainer upload.
>* Stop building the gcj packages.
>* Remove Ludovic and Werner as uploaders.

Hello Matthias,

You are listed as a member of the Java Team and as an Uploader, so there
is no need for an NMU.  There is an open bug in the BTS [1] for removing
the GCJ packages that I had tagged as pending and for which I pushed
changes to the VCS over a week ago.  Your upload doesn't refer to the
bug and so perhaps you weren't aware of it.

Since you are a member of the team, will you push your changes to the
VCS and handle the merge (as they step on changes I had already pushed)?

My delay in uploading was because (a) it takes a long time to rebuild
all of the reverse dependencies of ant (about 3 days on my machine, and
that was complicated somewhat by the default-jdk change) and (b) because
the update of the default-jdk results in an empty ant-javamail.jar.  I
was still in the process of looking at (b), preferring to wait a few
days instead of uploading a package that might cause other breakages.
Also, I thought that having tagged the bug as pending would be
sufficient coordination with the rest of the team.  

In general, I think it would be helpful if the Java Team could rely on
the BTS more for coordination.  For team-maintained packages, the
uploader can check the BTS and PTS [2] for open bugs and should always
pull the latest master branch from the VCS before preparing an upload.
Furthermore, I think it would helpful for developers to claim bugs as
owners - particularly given how much is changing right now with the
JDK9 transition.  If the team doesn't like that approach or has other
suggestions, please share them.

Thanks,
tony

[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=892528
[2] https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/ant 


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed (with 1 error): Re: Bug#893251: jabref 3.8 is started with OpenJDK 9 instead of 8

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> clone 890905 -1
Bug #890905 [jabref] jabref: doesn't build/run with default-jdk/-jre
Bug #893251 [jabref] jabref 3.8 is started with OpenJDK 9 instead of 8
Failed to clone 890905: Bug is marked as being merged with others. Use an 
existing clone.

> retitle -1 jabref: doesn't start with liblog4j2-java 2.10.0-1
Bug #893251 [jabref] jabref 3.8 is started with OpenJDK 9 instead of 8
Bug #890905 [jabref] jabref: doesn't build/run with default-jdk/-jre
Changed Bug title to 'jabref: doesn't start with liblog4j2-java 2.10.0-1' from 
'jabref 3.8 is started with OpenJDK 9 instead of 8'.
Changed Bug title to 'jabref: doesn't start with liblog4j2-java 2.10.0-1' from 
'jabref: doesn't build/run with default-jdk/-jre'.
> tag -1 - patch pending
Bug #893251 [jabref] jabref: doesn't start with liblog4j2-java 2.10.0-1
Bug #890905 [jabref] jabref: doesn't start with liblog4j2-java 2.10.0-1
Removed tag(s) patch and pending.
Removed tag(s) pending and patch.

-- 
890905: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=890905
893251: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=893251
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: Bug#893348: josm FTBFS with openjdk-9

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> reassign -1 src:openjfx
Bug #893348 [src:josm] josm FTBFS with openjdk-9
Bug reassigned from package 'src:josm' to 'src:openjfx'.
No longer marked as found in versions josm/0.0.svn13500+dfsg-1.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #893348 to the same values 
previously set
> retitle -1 openjfx not available for openjdk-9
Bug #893348 [src:openjfx] josm FTBFS with openjdk-9
Changed Bug title to 'openjfx not available for openjdk-9' from 'josm FTBFS 
with openjdk-9'.
> affects -1 src:josm
Bug #893348 [src:openjfx] openjfx not available for openjdk-9
Added indication that 893348 affects src:josm

-- 
893348: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=893348
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: Bug#893251: jabref 3.8 is started with OpenJDK 9 instead of 8

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> forcemerge 890905 -1
Bug #890905 [jabref] jabref: doesn't build/run with default-jdk/-jre
Bug #893251 [jabref] jabref 3.8 is started with OpenJDK 9 instead of 8
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://github.com/JabRef/jabref/issues/2594'.
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
Added tag(s) upstream, patch, and pending.
Merged 890905 893251

-- 
890905: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=890905
893251: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=893251
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: Bug#890905: jabref: does not launch

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> retitle -1 jabref: fails to build and start with openjdk-9
Bug #890905 [jabref] jabref: fails to start with openjdk-9-jre
Changed Bug title to 'jabref: fails to build and start with openjdk-9' from 
'jabref: fails to start with openjdk-9-jre'.
> severity -1 serious
Bug #890905 [jabref] jabref: fails to build and start with openjdk-9
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> tag -1 + patch
Bug #890905 [jabref] jabref: fails to build and start with openjdk-9
Added tag(s) patch.

-- 
890905: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=890905
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Re: Migration of the pkg-java-commits list

[Emmanuel Bourg]

Le 11/03/2018 à 23:40, Dominic Hargreaves a écrit :

> I assume that you are happy to be listed as the new owner. I'm CCing
> the list itself for transparency, and we'll migrate this unless we
> receive objections.

Many thanks!

Emmanuel Bourg

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

[bnd] 26/32: d/rules: Re-enable parallel build

[Kai-Chung Yan]

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.

seamlik-guest pushed a commit to branch master
in repository bnd.

commit e95e49c3848ef35efcfd5d5d3d26d1e2e423e080
Author: 殷啟聰 | Kai-Chung Yan <seamli...@gmail.com>
Date:   Sun Mar 4 11:25:47 2018 +0800

d/rules: Re-enable parallel build
---
 debian/rules | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/debian/rules b/debian/rules
index 8d57c93..c5c3d2f 100755
--- a/debian/rules
+++ b/debian/rules
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ PACKAGE  := bnd
 export JAVA_HOME = /usr/lib/jvm/default-java
 
 %:
-   dh $@ --buildsystem=gradle --with maven-repo-helper --no-parallel
+   dh $@ --buildsystem=gradle --with maven-repo-helper
 
 override_dh_auto_build:
$(RM) cnf/ext/central.mvn # It forces Gradle to fetch artifacts from 
remote.

-- 
Alioth's /usr/local/bin/git-commit-notice on 
/srv/git.debian.org/git/pkg-java/bnd.git

___
pkg-java-commits mailing list
pkg-java-comm...@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-commits

Processed: Re: FTBFS with Java 9 due to Terrible Swing

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> tag -1 + wontfix
Bug #873222 [src:jsymphonic] FTBFS with Java 9 due to Terrible Swing
Added tag(s) wontfix.

-- 
873222: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=873222
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: Bug#803713: Elasticsearch should not be part of a Debian release

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> clone -1 -2
Bug #803713 [src:elasticsearch] Elasticsearch should not be part of a Debian 
release
Bug 803713 cloned as bug 892466
> retitle -2 RM: elasticsearch -- ROM; NPOASR; unmaintained since ~2 years; 
> security issues
Bug #892466 [src:elasticsearch] Elasticsearch should not be part of a Debian 
release
Changed Bug title to 'RM: elasticsearch -- ROM; NPOASR; unmaintained since ~2 
years; security issues' from 'Elasticsearch should not be part of a Debian 
release'.
> severity -2 normal
Bug #892466 [src:elasticsearch] RM: elasticsearch -- ROM; NPOASR; unmaintained 
since ~2 years; security issues
Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious'
> reassign -2 ftp.debian.org
Bug #892466 [src:elasticsearch] RM: elasticsearch -- ROM; NPOASR; unmaintained 
since ~2 years; security issues
Bug reassigned from package 'src:elasticsearch' to 'ftp.debian.org'.
No longer marked as found in versions elasticsearch/1.6.2+dfsg-1.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #892466 to the same values 
previously set

-- 
803713: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=803713
892466: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=892466
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: FTBFS with Java 9: crypto overloads

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> fixed 875337 1.59-1
Bug #875337 [src:bouncycastle] FTBFS with Java 9: crypto overloads
Marked as fixed in versions bouncycastle/1.59-1.
> close 875337
Bug #875337 [src:bouncycastle] FTBFS with Java 9: crypto overloads
Marked Bug as done
>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
875337: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=875337
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Re: Bug#803713: Elasticsearch should not be part of a Debian release

[Emmanuel Bourg]

Le 08/03/2018 à 22:50, Nicolas Braud-Santoni a écrit :

> Given that this is the last activity and the package, that the last upload
> is almost 2 years old, and that no progress has been made towards fixing the
> RC bugs (esp. the issues wrt. security), should we ask ftp-masters to remove
> this package from sid?

+1

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: FTBFS with Java 9: sun.misc

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> tag -1 + wontfix
Bug #875365 [src:glassfish] FTBFS with Java 9: sun.misc
Added tag(s) wontfix.

-- 
875365: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=875365
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: Bug#890592: jruby FTBFS: Could not resolve dependencies for project org.jruby:jruby-core:jar:9.1.13.0

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> reassign -1 nailgun 0.9.3-1
Bug #890592 [src:jruby] jruby FTBFS: Could not resolve dependencies for project 
org.jruby:jruby-core:jar:9.1.13.0
Bug reassigned from package 'src:jruby' to 'nailgun'.
No longer marked as found in versions jruby/9.1.13.0-1.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #890592 to the same values 
previously set
Bug #890592 [nailgun] jruby FTBFS: Could not resolve dependencies for project 
org.jruby:jruby-core:jar:9.1.13.0
Marked as found in versions nailgun/0.9.3-1.
> retitle -1 nailgun: missing dependency on libjna-platform-java
Bug #890592 [nailgun] jruby FTBFS: Could not resolve dependencies for project 
org.jruby:jruby-core:jar:9.1.13.0
Changed Bug title to 'nailgun: missing dependency on libjna-platform-java' from 
'jruby FTBFS: Could not resolve dependencies for project 
org.jruby:jruby-core:jar:9.1.13.0'.
> affects -1 src:jruby jruby
Bug #890592 [nailgun] nailgun: missing dependency on libjna-platform-java
Added indication that 890592 affects src:jruby and jruby

-- 
890592: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=890592
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Re: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#793369: Any volunteer to maintain JAI that is RC buggy and dead upstream (Was: Bug#793369: jai-core: FTBFS - JPEGImageDecoder.java:29: error: package com.sun.image.codec

[Olivier Sallou]

On 07/23/2015 06:13 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> since Mathieu declared he will not keep on maintaining his Debian Med
> packages we have no active Uploader for this package to care for bugs
> like this.  Since I have no idea how to fix this I'm just asking for
> volunteers whether we will be able to properly maintain the package
> inside Debian or whether we rather want to drop it.
>
> There might be some chance to replace the non-free JAI by the free
> JAI-EXT which could be a potential replacement (but I have no idea how
> much adaptation is needed).
>
> Kind regards
>
> Andreas.
>
> [1] http://docs.geotools.org/latest/userguide/tutorial/raster/jaiext.html
>
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 01:04:41PM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>> Source: jai-core
>> Version: 1.1.4-3
>> Severity: serious
>> Tags: jessie sid stretch
>> Justification: fails to build from source
>>
>> from a rebuild in a clean jessie pbuilder environment (full log
>> attached):
>>
>> [...]
>> compilation:
>> [mkdir] Created dir: 
>> /tmp/buildd/jai-core-1.1.4/build/linux-amd64/opt/classes
>>  [copy] Copying 5 files to 
>> /tmp/buildd/jai-core-1.1.4/build/linux-amd64/opt
>> [javac] /tmp/buildd/jai-core-1.1.4/build.xml:633: warning: 
>> 'includeantruntime' was not set, defaulting to build.sysclasspath=last; set 
>> to false for repeatable builds
>> [javac] Compiling 829 source files to 
>> /tmp/buildd/jai-core-1.1.4/build/linux-amd64/opt/classes
>> [javac] warning: [options] bootstrap class path not set in conjunction 
>> with -source 1.3
>> [javac] 
>> /tmp/buildd/jai-core-1.1.4/src/share/classes/com/sun/media/jai/codecimpl/JPEGImageDecoder.java:29:
>>  error: package com.sun.image.codec.jpeg does not exist
>> [javac] import com.sun.image.codec.jpeg.ImageFormatException;
this package does not exists anymore [0]

Synopsis: The Non-standard com.sun.image.codec.jpeg Package is Retired

Description: The com.sun.image.codec.jpeg package was added in JDK 1.2
(Dec 1998) as a non-standard way of controlling the loading and saving
of JPEG format image files. This package was never part of the platform
specification and it has been removed from the Java SE 7 release. The
Java Image I/O API was added to the JDK 1.4 release as a standard API
and eliminated the need for the com.sun.image.codec.jpeg package.

Depending on what is done, code could be modified (I have not checked)
to use Java Image, but I think this would impact quite a few the code,
and, in any case, difficult to keep it in sync with upstream (or is
upstream dead?)

[0]
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1906673/import-com-sun-image-codec-jpeg

Olivier

>> [javac]^
>> [javac] 
>> /tmp/buildd/jai-core-1.1.4/src/share/classes/com/sun/media/jai/codecimpl/JPEGImageEncoder.java:35:
>>  error: package com.sun.image.codec.jpeg does not exist
>> [javac] import com.sun.image.codec.jpeg.JPEGQTable;
>> [javac]^
>> [javac] 
>> /tmp/buildd/jai-core-1.1.4/src/share/classes/com/sun/media/jai/codecimpl/JPEGImageEncoder.java:36:
>>  error: package com.sun.image.codec.jpeg does not exist
>> [javac] import com.sun.image.codec.jpeg.JPEGDecodeParam;
>> [javac]^
>> [javac] 
>> /tmp/buildd/jai-core-1.1.4/src/share/classes/com/sun/media/jai/codecimpl/JPEGImageEncoder.java:68:
>>  error: package com.sun.image.codec.jpeg does not exist
>> [javac]   com.sun.image.codec.jpeg.JPEGEncodeParam j2dEP,
>> [javac]   ^
>> [javac] 
>> /tmp/buildd/jai-core-1.1.4/src/share/classes/com/sun/media/jai/codecimpl/TIFFImage.java:53:
>>  error: package com.sun.image.codec.jpeg does not exist
>> [javac] import com.sun.image.codec.jpeg.JPEGCodec;
>> [javac]^
>> [javac] 
>> /tmp/buildd/jai-core-1.1.4/src/share/classes/com/sun/media/jai/codecimpl/TIFFImage.java:54:
>>  error: package com.sun.image.codec.jpeg does not exist
>> [javac] import com.sun.image.codec.jpeg.JPEGDecodeParam;
>> [javac]^
>> [javac] 
>> /tmp/buildd/jai-core-1.1.4/src/share/classes/com/sun/media/jai/codecimpl/TIFFImage.java:55:
>>  error: package com.sun.image.codec.jpeg does not exist
>> [javac] import com.sun.image.codec.jpeg.JPEGImageDecoder;
>> [javac]^
>> [javac] 
>> /tmp/buildd/jai-core-1.1.4/src/share/classes/com/sun/media/jai/codecimpl/TIFFImage.java:114:
>>  error: cannot find symbol
>> [javac] JPEGDecodeParam decodeParam = null;
>> [javac] ^
>> [javac]   symbol:   class JPEGDecodeParam
>> [javac]   location: class TIFFImage
>> [javac] 
>> /tmp/buildd/jai-core-1.1.4/src/share/classes/com/sun/media/jai/codecimpl/TIFFImage.java:146:
>>  error: cannot find symbol
>> [javac]JPEGDecodeParam 
>> decodeParam,
>> [javac]

Re: Bug#771988: RM: jspwiki/2.8.0-5 -- RoM, NBS

[Adam D. Barratt]

Control: reassign -1 ftp.debian.org

On Wed, 2014-12-03 at 22:49 -0800, tony mancill wrote:
> I'm not sure if this is the right way to request removal of a package
> from unstable (https://wiki.debian.org/ftpmaster_Removals doesn't
> explicitly list unstable, that I could find),

It's not; you want ftp.debian.org, as ftp-master handle unstable.
Re-assigning with this message.

The "how to request removal" section of that wiki page does say "File a
bug against the ftp.debian.org pseudo-package". Unstable is not
explicitly mentioned as an ftp.d.o bug is the default action; the
"testing, stable and oldstable" section exists to document the
exceptions to that.

> but I'd like to request
> the removal of jspwiki.  The package is outdated (2+ years behind
> upstream), in contrib, and currently FTBFS.  It is also wrapped up in
> the [auto-cruft] report for tomcat6.
> 
> This removal was discussed on debian-java; we'll look at packaging a
> fresher version of jspwiki down the road.
> 
> Please let me know how to direct this request if I have landed in the
> wrong place.
> 
> Cheers, and thank you in advance,
> tony

Regards,

Adam


__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
<http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers>. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Re: tomcat6 wheezy DSA (was/and Re: tomcat6_6.0.41-2+squeeze5_amd64.changes REJECTED

[Adam D. Barratt]

On Sun, 2014-11-23 at 21:03 +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi Adam,
> 
> On Sonntag, 23. November 2014, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Sun, 2014-11-23 at 19:43 +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > > oh, "btw": jessie has -2, sid -3, with changes unsuitable for wheezy and
> > > targeted at jessie. this needs an unblock request to let -3 migrate to
> > > jessie and have the binaries removed from sid first... anybody doing
> > > this?
> > 
> > It needs more than that; from the cruft-report:
> 
> that's the cruft report for which distro?

For unstable, to go with your "needs ... the binaries removed from sid".
Those are the things blocking ftp-master from semi-automagically
removing them.

Regards,

Adam



__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Re: Help needed with updating some Java libraries (netlib-java, libmtj-java)

[Olivier Sallou]

On 08/29/2014 02:38 AM, tony mancill wrote:
> On 08/28/2014 07:01 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> when checking my Maintainer dashboard dashboard I realised that the
>> watch file of netlib-java and libmtj-java became disfunctional and when
>> tracking down the issue I noticed that both projects moved from SF to
>> Github.  While I updated the URLs in SVN accordingly I noticed that the
>> Build system has changed as well which just crosses my (low) level of
>> Java competence (again).
>>
>> Since both packages are definitely not really in the field of Debian Med
>> but just preconditions for some biological package (beast) I wonder
>> whether this might be the right point in time to move the package to
>> Debian Java.  I'd volunteer to inject the package into Debian Java Git
>> but in turn I would need some help (starting with netlib-java).  I have
>> the feeling that the amount of work for a skilled Java packager is low
>> (but I really would not regard myself as such a person).
>>
>> BTW, the packages are hanging around in contrib since netlib depends
>> from f2j (at least the current version).  I'll send a separate mail to
>> f2j authors to try (again) to convince them to use a DFSG free license.
>>
>> Kind regards
>>
>> Andreas.
>>
> Hello Andreas,
>
> If you're willing to migrate these to the pkg-java repo, I'll work on
> updating them and uploading them as Java Team packages.
>
> Also, I've been meaning to send you a mail regarding libsnappy-java,
> since we have an RC bug there.  The last commit makes it appear that you
> were considering moving it debian-med in 2012.  Is that still the case?
We have a libsnappy-java version available in DebianMed [0], but a
specific release (certainly due to a package which needed this specific
release and upstream broke its API).
I do not know if we need to manage snappy by itself in DebianMed repo as
it has nothing related to bio/med but is only a dependency.

[0] https://packages.qa.debian.org/s/snappy1.0.3-java.html

Olivier
>
> Cheers,
> tony
>

-- 
Olivier Sallou
IRISA / University of Rennes 1
Campus de Beaulieu, 35000 RENNES - FRANCE
Tel: 02.99.84.71.95

gpg key id: 4096R/326D8438  (keyring.debian.org)
Key fingerprint = 5FB4 6F83 D3B9 5204 6335  D26D 78DC 68DB 326D 8438


__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Re: tomcat6 wheezy DSA (was/and Re: tomcat6_6.0.41-2+squeeze5_amd64.changes REJECTED

[Adam D. Barratt]

On Sun, 2014-11-23 at 19:43 +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
> oh, "btw": jessie has -2, sid -3, with changes unsuitable for wheezy and 
> targeted at jessie. this needs an unblock request to let -3 migrate to jessie 
> and have the binaries removed from sid first... anybody doing this?

It needs more than that; from the cruft-report:

* package libtomcat6-java in version 6.0.41-2 is no longer built from source
[...]
  - broken Depends:
tomcat-maven-plugin: libtomcat-maven-plugin-java
[...]
* package tomcat6 in version 6.0.41-2 is no longer built from source
[...]
  - broken Depends:
biomaj-watcher/contrib: biomaj-watcher
guacamole-client: guacamole-tomcat
jspwiki/contrib: jspwiki
  - broken Build-Depends:
jspwiki/contrib: tomcat6

* package tomcat6-common in version 6.0.41-2 is no longer built from source
[...
  - broken Build-Depends:
tomcat-maven-plugin: tomcat6-common

Regards,

Adam



__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Re: Help needed with updating some Java libraries (netlib-java, libmtj-java)

[Olivier Sallou]

On 08/29/2014 08:22 AM, Olivier Sallou wrote:
> On 08/29/2014 02:38 AM, tony mancill wrote:
>> On 08/28/2014 07:01 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> when checking my Maintainer dashboard dashboard I realised that the
>>> watch file of netlib-java and libmtj-java became disfunctional and when
>>> tracking down the issue I noticed that both projects moved from SF to
>>> Github.  While I updated the URLs in SVN accordingly I noticed that the
>>> Build system has changed as well which just crosses my (low) level of
>>> Java competence (again).
>>>
>>> Since both packages are definitely not really in the field of Debian Med
>>> but just preconditions for some biological package (beast) I wonder
>>> whether this might be the right point in time to move the package to
>>> Debian Java.  I'd volunteer to inject the package into Debian Java Git
>>> but in turn I would need some help (starting with netlib-java).  I have
>>> the feeling that the amount of work for a skilled Java packager is low
>>> (but I really would not regard myself as such a person).
>>>
>>> BTW, the packages are hanging around in contrib since netlib depends
>>> from f2j (at least the current version).  I'll send a separate mail to
>>> f2j authors to try (again) to convince them to use a DFSG free license.
>>>
>>> Kind regards
>>>
>>> Andreas.
>>>
>> Hello Andreas,
>>
>> If you're willing to migrate these to the pkg-java repo, I'll work on
>> updating them and uploading them as Java Team packages.
>>
>> Also, I've been meaning to send you a mail regarding libsnappy-java,
>> since we have an RC bug there.  

I have sent a patch to fix the bug on loading native library. However
this raises an other issue, it seems that Java lib is not matching
native lib on methods.
I have put details in the bug.

Olivier

>> The last commit makes it appear that you
>> were considering moving it debian-med in 2012.  Is that still the case?
> We have a libsnappy-java version available in DebianMed [0], but a
> specific release (certainly due to a package which needed this specific
> release and upstream broke its API).
> I do not know if we need to manage snappy by itself in DebianMed repo as
> it has nothing related to bio/med but is only a dependency.
>
> [0] https://packages.qa.debian.org/s/snappy1.0.3-java.html
>
> Olivier
>> Cheers,
>> tony
>>

-- 
Olivier Sallou
IRISA / University of Rennes 1
Campus de Beaulieu, 35000 RENNES - FRANCE
Tel: 02.99.84.71.95

gpg key id: 4096R/326D8438  (keyring.debian.org)
Key fingerprint = 5FB4 6F83 D3B9 5204 6335  D26D 78DC 68DB 326D 8438


__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: Bug#891957: netbeans no starting "loading module" modules.netbinox NullPointerException

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> severity -1 grave
Bug #891957 [netbeans] netbeans no starting "loading module" modules.netbinox 
NullPointerException
Severity set to 'grave' from 'critical'
> block -1 by 882525
Bug #891957 [netbeans] netbeans no starting "loading module" modules.netbinox 
NullPointerException
891957 was not blocked by any bugs.
891957 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 891957: 882525

-- 
891957: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=891957
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: CVE-2018-1047: information disclosure of arbitrary local files

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> severity -1 important
Bug #891929 [src:undertow] CVE-2018-1047: information disclosure of arbitrary 
local files
Severity set to 'important' from 'grave'

-- 
891929: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=891929
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: undertow: CVE-2017-7559: HTTP Request smuggling vulnerability (incomplete fix of CVE-2017-2666)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> forwarded -1 https://issues.jboss.org/browse/UNDERTOW-1251
Bug #885338 [src:undertow] CVE-2017-12165
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://issues.jboss.org/browse/UNDERTOW-1251'.

-- 
885338: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=885338
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: Bug#890905: jabref: does not launch

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> retitle -1 jabref: fails to start with openjdk-9-jre
Bug #890905 [jabref] jabref: does not launch
Changed Bug title to 'jabref: fails to start with openjdk-9-jre' from 'jabref: 
does not launch'.

-- 
890905: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=890905
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Re: [maven] 03/03: Upgrade to 3.5.2

[Stephen Kitt]

On Thu, 22 Feb 2018 22:49:21 +0100, Emmanuel Bourg  wrote:
> Le 22/02/2018 à 18:53, Stephen Kitt a écrit :
> > Done, thanks! If you think this is ready to go, I can take care of
> > uploading the package...  
> 
> I tested quickly, the package builds fine and can rebuild itself
> afterward. This update doesn't seem to break Gradle this time, so it
> looks good to me. Enjoy your first Maven upload :)

Uploaded, thanks ;-). I changed the package to install NOTICE too, to
appease Lintian — I’m not convinced it’s necessary in this instance, but
I reckoned it wasn’t especially onerous and the safest long-term option.

Regards,

Stephen


pgpD2oHiEWIsx.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Re: [maven] 03/03: Upgrade to 3.5.2

[Emmanuel Bourg]

Le 22/02/2018 à 23:25, Stephen Kitt a écrit :

> Uploaded, thanks ;-). I changed the package to install NOTICE too, to
> appease Lintian — I’m not convinced it’s necessary in this instance, but
> I reckoned it wasn’t especially onerous and the safest long-term option.

Thank you! I'm not convinced we have to put the NOTICE files in the
binary packages either since we already have the debian/copyright files
and the Apache-2.0 license allows putting the attribution notices in
another documentation file, but I'm not going to argue over this.

Emmanuel Bourg

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Re: [maven] 03/03: Upgrade to 3.5.2

[Emmanuel Bourg]

Le 22/02/2018 à 18:53, Stephen Kitt a écrit :

> Done, thanks! If you think this is ready to go, I can take care of uploading
> the package...

I tested quickly, the package builds fine and can rebuild itself
afterward. This update doesn't seem to break Gradle this time, so it
looks good to me. Enjoy your first Maven upload :)

Emmanuel Bourg

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Re: [maven] 03/03: Upgrade to 3.5.2

[Stephen Kitt]

On Thu, 22 Feb 2018 15:46:34 +0100, Emmanuel Bourg  wrote:
> Le 22/02/2018 à 14:54, Stephen Kitt a écrit :
> > diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
> > index 346a6f9..9b8c36f 100644
> > --- a/debian/control
> > +++ b/debian/control
> > @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ Build-Depends-Indep: junit4,
> >   libcommons-lang3-java (>= 3.4-2~),
> >   libcommons-logging-java,
> >   libeasymock-java,
> > + libgeronimo-annotation-1.3-spec-java,
> >   libguice-java (>= 4.0),
> >   liblogback-java,
> >   libmaven-parent-java (>= 27),  
> 
> You also need a symlink for this dependency in debian/maven.links.
> When I attempted the Maven 3.5.1 upgrade I added this:
[...]

Done, thanks! If you think this is ready to go, I can take care of uploading
the package...

Regards,

Stephen


pgp5go829dESV.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Re: [maven] 03/03: Upgrade to 3.5.2

[Emmanuel Bourg]

Le 22/02/2018 à 14:54, Stephen Kitt a écrit :

> diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
> index 346a6f9..9b8c36f 100644
> --- a/debian/control
> +++ b/debian/control
> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ Build-Depends-Indep: junit4,
>   libcommons-lang3-java (>= 3.4-2~),
>   libcommons-logging-java,
>   libeasymock-java,
> + libgeronimo-annotation-1.3-spec-java,
>   libguice-java (>= 4.0),
>   liblogback-java,
>   libmaven-parent-java (>= 27),

You also need a symlink for this dependency in debian/maven.links.
When I attempted the Maven 3.5.1 upgrade I added this:

--- a/debian/maven.links
+++ b/debian/maven.links
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
 /usr/share/java/jansi.jar
/usr/share/maven/lib/jansi.jar
 /usr/share/java/atinject-jsr330-api-1.0.jar  
/usr/share/maven/lib/javax.inject.jar
 /usr/share/java/jcl-over-slf4j.jar   
/usr/share/maven/lib/jcl-over-slf4j.jar
+/usr/share/java/geronimo-annotation-1.3-spec.jar 
/usr/share/maven/lib/jsr250-api.jar
 /usr/share/java/maven-resolver-api.jar   
/usr/share/maven/lib/maven-resolver-api.jar
 /usr/share/java/maven-resolver-connector-basic.jar   
/usr/share/maven/lib/maven-resolver-connector-basic.jar
 /usr/share/java/maven-resolver-impl.jar  
/usr/share/maven/lib/maven-resolver-impl.jar

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: Bug#837081: netbeans: Crashes due to assertion failure in GLib

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> reassign -1 java-atk-wrapper
Bug #837081 [netbeans] netbeans: Crashes due to assertion failure in GLib
Bug reassigned from package 'netbeans' to 'java-atk-wrapper'.
No longer marked as found in versions netbeans/8.1+dfsg3-1.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #837081 to the same values 
previously set

-- 
837081: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=837081
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#843951: [node-async] Please update to version 1.5.2

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> block -1 by 733586
Bug #843951 [node-async] [node-async] Please update to version 1.5.2
843951 was not blocked by any bugs.
843951 was blocking: 843952 890611
Added blocking bug(s) of 843951: 733586

-- 
843951: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=843951
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: jruby FTBFS: Could not resolve dependencies for project org.jruby:jruby-core:jar:9.1.13.0

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tags 890592 + confirmed
Bug #890592 [src:jruby] jruby FTBFS: Could not resolve dependencies for project 
org.jruby:jruby-core:jar:9.1.13.0
Added tag(s) confirmed.
> owner 890592 !
Bug #890592 [src:jruby] jruby FTBFS: Could not resolve dependencies for project 
org.jruby:jruby-core:jar:9.1.13.0
Owner recorded as Miguel Landaeta .
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
890592: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=890592
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Re: checkstyle in Debian

[Iain Learmonth]

Hi,

On 11/02/18 19:44, tony mancill wrote:
> I've started on updating checkstyle to 8.8.  Thus far, it looks like
> we'll need to update libsaxonhe-java from 9.7 -> 9.8 in order to have
> ArrayIterator.OfNodes [0].  Either that, or we'll have to patch around
> it.

Ok.

> If you're interested in helping things along, an updated saxonhe is next
> on the list.

If I have time before you do, I can certainly look into this.

Thanks,
Iain.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Re: checkstyle in Debian

[Iain Learmonth]

Hi,

On 11/02/18 18:50, tony mancill wrote:
> The stretch release was in a freeze at the time of that upload to
> experimental, so it's just a miss on my part that I didn't subsequently
> upload to unstable after the release.  Thank you for the ping.

Ok, cool.

> I am currenlty building the r-deps with ratt and assuming all looks
> good, will upload 7.5 to unstable today.  However, I echo Markus's
> comment about a constant need for developers on the Java team.  Please
> feel free to contribute.

Awesome! While I don't currently have that much time available, it's
possible that time will become available later in the year.

Thanks,
Iain.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Re: checkstyle in Debian

[tony mancill]

On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 09:48:32PM +, Iain Learmonth wrote:
 
> 7.5 was uploaded to experimental last year, but never went to unstable.
> Latest upstream is 8.8.
> 
> Do you need some help with this?

I've started on updating checkstyle to 8.8.  Thus far, it looks like
we'll need to update libsaxonhe-java from 9.7 -> 9.8 in order to have
ArrayIterator.OfNodes [0].  Either that, or we'll have to patch around
it.

If you're interested in helping things along, an updated saxonhe is next
on the list.

Cheers,
tony

[0] 
http://www.saxonica.com/documentation/#!javadoc/net.sf.saxon.tree.iter/ArrayIterator/OfNodes


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Re: checkstyle in Debian

[tony mancill]

On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 02:49:48PM +0100, Markus Koschany wrote:
> Hi Iain
> 
> @adding tony to CC
> 
> Am 09.02.2018 um 22:48 schrieb Iain Learmonth:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Was just wondering why checkstyle hasn't been updated in a while. It's
> > now 2 major versions behind.
> > 
> > 7.5 was uploaded to experimental last year, but never went to unstable.
> > Latest upstream is 8.8.
> > 
> > Do you need some help with this?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Iain.
> 
> 
> Generally speaking, yes we need help with maintaining Java stuff. We are
> very few active members at the moment. If a package is outdated it is
> mostly due to lack of manpower. I don't know why checkstyle in
> experimental was not uploaded to unstable but if the new release doesn't
> break any reverse-dependencies we could upload it to unstable.

Hello Iain, hi Markus,

The stretch release was in a freeze at the time of that upload to
experimental, so it's just a miss on my part that I didn't subsequently
upload to unstable after the release.  Thank you for the ping.

I am currenlty building the r-deps with ratt and assuming all looks
good, will upload 7.5 to unstable today.  However, I echo Markus's
comment about a constant need for developers on the Java team.  Please
feel free to contribute.

Cheers,
tony


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Re: checkstyle in Debian

[Markus Koschany]

Hi Iain

@adding tony to CC

Am 09.02.2018 um 22:48 schrieb Iain Learmonth:
> Hi,
> 
> Was just wondering why checkstyle hasn't been updated in a while. It's
> now 2 major versions behind.
> 
> 7.5 was uploaded to experimental last year, but never went to unstable.
> Latest upstream is 8.8.
> 
> Do you need some help with this?
> 
> Thanks,
> Iain.


Generally speaking, yes we need help with maintaining Java stuff. We are
very few active members at the moment. If a package is outdated it is
mostly due to lack of manpower. I don't know why checkstyle in
experimental was not uploaded to unstable but if the new release doesn't
break any reverse-dependencies we could upload it to unstable.

Regards,

Markus



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: eclipse: FTBFS: /<>/build.xml:413: Could not find suitable system JAR for org.apache.commons.httpclient_3.1.0.v201012070820.jar. Tried: /usr/share/java/commons-httpclient.j

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> reassign -1 commons-httpclient
Bug #871142 [src:eclipse] eclipse: FTBFS: /<>/build.xml:413: Could 
not find suitable system JAR for 
org.apache.commons.httpclient_3.1.0.v201012070820.jar.  Tried:  
/usr/share/java/commons-httpclient.jar
Bug reassigned from package 'src:eclipse' to 'commons-httpclient'.
No longer marked as found in versions eclipse/3.8.1-10.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #871142 to the same values 
previously set
> retitle -1 Missing OSGi metadata breaks Eclipse
Bug #871142 [commons-httpclient] eclipse: FTBFS: 
/<>/build.xml:413: Could not find suitable system JAR for 
org.apache.commons.httpclient_3.1.0.v201012070820.jar.  Tried:  
/usr/share/java/commons-httpclient.jar
Changed Bug title to 'Missing OSGi metadata breaks Eclipse' from 'eclipse: 
FTBFS: /<>/build.xml:413: Could not find suitable system JAR for 
org.apache.commons.httpclient_3.1.0.v201012070820.jar.  Tried:  
/usr/share/java/commons-httpclient.jar'.
> tags -1 pending
Bug #871142 [commons-httpclient] Missing OSGi metadata breaks Eclipse
Added tag(s) pending.
> affects -1 src:eclipse
Bug #871142 [commons-httpclient] Missing OSGi metadata breaks Eclipse
Added indication that 871142 affects src:eclipse

-- 
871142: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=871142
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: Bug#888040: libjcifs-java - Missing maven dependencies

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> tags -1 pending
Bug #888040 [libjcifs-java] libjcifs-java - Missing maven dependencies
Added tag(s) pending.

-- 
888040: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=888040
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: Bug#733586: closure-compiler: new upstream version available

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> block 886411 by -1
Bug #886411 [wnpp] ITP: node-react -- JavaScript library for building user 
interfaces
886411 was blocked by: 886404
886411 was blocking: 886215
Added blocking bug(s) of 886411: 733586

-- 
733586: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=733586
886411: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=886411
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: jh_linkjars: Invalid option: N

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> reassign -1 javahelper
Bug #887666 [debhelper] jh_linkjars: Invalid option: N
Bug reassigned from package 'debhelper' to 'javahelper'.
No longer marked as found in versions debhelper/11.1.2.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #887666 to the same values 
previously set

-- 
887666: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=887666
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Fwd: Re: jh_linkjars: Invalid option: N

[Niels Thykier]

Typo'ed the email; manual forward to fix it. :)


 Forwarded Message 
Subject: Re: jh_linkjars: Invalid option: N
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 21:48:00 +
From: Niels Thykier <ni...@thykier.net>
To: 887...@bugs.debian.org
CC: Adrian Bunk <b...@debian.org>, javato...@package.debian.org

Control: reassign -1 javahelper

On Thu, 18 Jan 2018 23:41:19 +0200 Adrian Bunk <b...@debian.org> wrote:
> Package: debhelper
> Version: 11.1.2
> Severity: serious
> Control: affects -1 javahelper src:zabbix
> 
> https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/zabbix.html
> 
> ...
>jh_linkjars -O--max-parallel=4 -Nzabbix-frontend-php -Nzabbix-java-gateway
> Invalid option: N
> Usage: jh_linkjars [options] [target] 
> Options:
>   -h --help: show this text
>   -V --version: show the version
>   -v --verbose: show more information while running
>   -t --transitive: transitively link jars
>   -n --no-act: don't actually do anything, just print the results
>   -u --unlink: remove the links instead of adding them
> debian/rules:77: recipe for target 'binary' failed
> make: *** [binary] Error 1
> 
> 
> Works after downgrading to debhelper 11
> 
> 


The -N option is a basic "shared" debhelper option required by any
dh-like tool added to the debhelper sequence (similar to -p/-s/-i).  The
solution here is to have javahelper support that option.

Thanks,
~Niels


__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
<http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers>. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Re: Proposed (lib)curl switch to openssl 1.1

[Julien Cristau]

On 01/11/2018 12:59 AM, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 02, 2017 at 06:09:39PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 15:49:26 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
>>> Reasons I am aware that it *might* be a bad idea are:
>>>
>>> 1. libcurl exposes parts of the openssl ABI, via
>>>CURLOPT_SSL_CTX_FUNCTION, and this would be an implicit ABI break
>>>without libcurl soname change.  This is not good, but it seems like
>>>the alternative would be to diverge our soname from everyone else's
>>>for the same libcurl.
>>>
>>> 2. For the reason just mentioned, it might be a good idea to put in a
>>>Breaks against old versions of packages using
>>>CURLOPT_SSL_CTX_FUNCTION.  However, (a) I am not sure if this is
>>>actually necessary (b) in any case I don't have a good list of all
>>>the appropriate versions (c) maybe this would need coordination.
>>>
>>> 3. This might be an implicit a "transition" (in the Debian release
>>>management sense) which I would be mishandling, or starting without
>>>permission, or something.
>>>
>> Because of 1 I think we should change the package name (and SONAME) for
>> libcurl3.  I don't think 2 is appropriate.
> 
> Following discussion on the ticket (#858398) it was suggested to follow the
> strategy used for the GCC 5 C++ ABI transition, that is, rename the libcurl
> package and add Conflicts+Replaces for teh old package.
> 
I still think that is a terrible idea and we're better off with both a
new SONAME and a new package name.  Conflicts in core libraries turn the
upgrade path to hell.

Cheers,
Julien

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Re: Proposed (lib)curl switch to openssl 1.1

[Alessandro Ghedini]

On Sat, Dec 02, 2017 at 06:09:39PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 15:49:26 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Reasons I am aware that it *might* be a bad idea are:
> > 
> > 1. libcurl exposes parts of the openssl ABI, via
> >CURLOPT_SSL_CTX_FUNCTION, and this would be an implicit ABI break
> >without libcurl soname change.  This is not good, but it seems like
> >the alternative would be to diverge our soname from everyone else's
> >for the same libcurl.
> > 
> > 2. For the reason just mentioned, it might be a good idea to put in a
> >Breaks against old versions of packages using
> >CURLOPT_SSL_CTX_FUNCTION.  However, (a) I am not sure if this is
> >actually necessary (b) in any case I don't have a good list of all
> >the appropriate versions (c) maybe this would need coordination.
> > 
> > 3. This might be an implicit a "transition" (in the Debian release
> >management sense) which I would be mishandling, or starting without
> >permission, or something.
> > 
> Because of 1 I think we should change the package name (and SONAME) for
> libcurl3.  I don't think 2 is appropriate.

Following discussion on the ticket (#858398) it was suggested to follow the
strategy used for the GCC 5 C++ ABI transition, that is, rename the libcurl
package and add Conflicts+Replaces for teh old package.

Due to the fact that the previous transition (libcurl3 -> libcurl4) was
partially reverted (in 2007 according to the changelog), I'd also like to
taeke this opportunity to finally complete that as well, so I made a patch
to not only rename libcurl3 -> libcurl4, but also (libcurl3-gnutls,
libcurl3-nss) -> (libcurl4-gnutls, libcurl4-nss), and remove the hacks needed
to keep compatibility with the previous ABI.

Thoughts?

The patch is at https://salsa.debian.org/debian/curl/merge_requests/2

CHeers


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed (with 1 error): Re: jetty9: RolloverFileOutputStream does not roll over

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> fixed 873695 9.2.22-1
Bug #873695 [jetty9] jetty9: RolloverFileOutputStream does not roll over
Marked as fixed in versions jetty9/9.2.22-1.
> done 873695
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
873695: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=873695
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: Bug#886394: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: javafx.scene.layout.HBox

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> severity -1 important
Bug #886394 [pdfsam] java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: javafx.scene.layout.HBox
Severity set to 'important' from 'grave'

-- 
886394: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=886394
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: Bug#886090: solr-jetty: Doesn't work out-of-the-box anymore; required symlink is missing

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> severity -1 important
Bug #886090 [solr-jetty] solr-jetty: Doesn't work out-of-the-box anymore; 
required symlink is missing
Severity set to 'important' from 'normal'
> owner -1 !
Bug #886090 [solr-jetty] solr-jetty: Doesn't work out-of-the-box anymore; 
required symlink is missing
Owner recorded as Markus Koschany .

-- 
886090: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=886090
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Re: Wheezy update of libhibernate-validator-java?

[Emmanuel Bourg]

Le 02/01/2018 à 09:40, Chris Lamb a écrit :

> The Debian LTS team would like to fix the security issues which are
> currently open in the Wheezy version of libhibernate-validator-java:
> https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/source-package/libhibernate-validator-java

libhibernate-validator-java is mostly a build dependency of hibernate
with a low popcon. I think security updates for this packages can be
ignored as far as Wheezy LTS is concerned as they will benefit almost
zero users.

Emmanuel Bourg

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: Bug#885577: libhibernate-validator-java: CVE-2017-7536: Privilege escalation when running under the security manager

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> found -1 4.3.3-1
Bug #885577 [src:libhibernate-validator-java] libhibernate-validator-java: 
CVE-2017-7536: Privilege escalation when running under the security manager
Marked as found in versions libhibernate-validator-java/4.3.3-1.
> tags -1 + upstream fixed-upstream
Bug #885577 [src:libhibernate-validator-java] libhibernate-validator-java: 
CVE-2017-7536: Privilege escalation when running under the security manager
Added tag(s) upstream and fixed-upstream.

-- 
885577: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=885577
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: swt4-gtk: Please drop the (build-)dependency against gnome-vfs

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> tags -1 +patch
Bug #868404 [src:swt4-gtk] swt4-gtk: Please drop the (build-)dependency against 
gnome-vfs
Added tag(s) patch.
> severity -1 serious
Bug #868404 [src:swt4-gtk] swt4-gtk: Please drop the (build-)dependency against 
gnome-vfs
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'

-- 
868404: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=868404
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: Bug#885383: find_java_runtime should use the preferred JRE

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> reassign -1 java-wrappers
Bug #885383 [sweethome3d] sweethome3d: crashes during start with Cursor 
exception
Bug reassigned from package 'sweethome3d' to 'java-wrappers'.
No longer marked as found in versions sweethome3d/5.6+dfsg-1.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #885383 to the same values 
previously set
> retitle -1  find_java_runtime should use the preferred JRE
Bug #885383 [java-wrappers] sweethome3d: crashes during start with Cursor 
exception
Changed Bug title to 'find_java_runtime should use the preferred JRE' from 
'sweethome3d: crashes during start with Cursor exception'.

-- 
885383: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=885383
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: FTBFS with Java 9: crypto overloads

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> forwarded 875337 https://github.com/bcgit/bc-java/issues/209
Bug #875337 [src:bouncycastle] FTBFS with Java 9: crypto overloads
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://github.com/bcgit/bc-java/issues/209'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
875337: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=875337
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: bouncycastle: CVE-2017-13098

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> owner -1 !
Bug #884241 [src:bouncycastle] bouncycastle: CVE-2017-13098
Owner recorded as Markus Koschany .

-- 
884241: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=884241
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: Bug#883387: libjaxb-java 2.3.0-3 causes FTBFS in eclipselink

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> found 883387 2.6.5-2
Bug #883387 [src:eclipselink] libjaxb-java 2.3.0-3 causes FTBFS in eclipselink
Marked as found in versions eclipselink/2.6.5-2.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
883387: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=883387
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: Bug#883387: libjaxb-java 2.3.0-3 causes FTBFS in eclipselink

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> reassign -1 src:eclipselink
Bug #883387 [libjaxb-java] libjaxb-java 2.3.0-3 causes FTBFS in eclipselink
Bug reassigned from package 'libjaxb-java' to 'src:eclipselink'.
No longer marked as found in versions jaxb/2.3.0-3.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #883387 to the same values 
previously set

-- 
883387: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=883387
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: FTBFS with Java 9: import sun.misc..

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> block -1 by 873227
Bug #874132 [src:triplea] FTBFS with Java 9: import sun.misc..
874132 was not blocked by any bugs.
874132 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 874132: 873227

-- 
874132: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=874132
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: Bug#882181: mockito: FTBFS - java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException: Cannot nest operations in the same thread

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> reassign -1 src:gradle
Bug #882181 [src:mockito] mockito: FTBFS - 
java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException: Cannot nest operations in the same 
thread
Bug reassigned from package 'src:mockito' to 'src:gradle'.
No longer marked as found in versions mockito/1.10.19-2.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #882181 to the same values 
previously set
> found -1 3.2.1-5
Bug #882181 [src:gradle] mockito: FTBFS - 
java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException: Cannot nest operations in the same 
thread
Marked as found in versions gradle/3.2.1-5.
> fixed -1 3.4.1-2
Bug #882181 [src:gradle] mockito: FTBFS - 
java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException: Cannot nest operations in the same 
thread
Marked as fixed in versions gradle/3.4.1-2.

-- 
882181: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=882181
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Re: Proposed (lib)curl switch to openssl 1.1

[Julien Cristau]

On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 15:49:26 +, Ian Jackson wrote:

> (Resending to fix the mail headers, sorry.  Please reply to this one,
> not the previous one.)
> 
> Hi.  You're receiving this mail because you fall into one or more of the
> following categories:
>  * Are associated with the curl package (To)
>  * Have been involved in discussions I found in the BTS about
>libcurl and openssl 1.1 (CC), eg in #850880 or #844018
>  * Maintain a package which calls CURLOPT_SSL_CTX_FUNCTION
>(CC, "CURLOPT_SSL_CTX_FUNCTION callers")
>  * Are the Release Team (To, see bullet point 3 below)
> 
> We really need to migrate libcurl to openssl 1.1.  This is #858398,
> which has not seen activity from any libcurl maintainers.
> 
> I am listed as an Uploader for curl but I haven't done a curl upload
> and don't really understand the issues well.  But, as far as I
> understand it, the right thing to do is just to change the
> build-dependencies.
> 
> I have prepared a patch to do this and intend to upload it to sid on
> Sunday unless someone explains to my why it's a bad idea.  See below.
> 
Thanks for moving this forward.

> Reasons I am aware that it *might* be a bad idea are:
> 
> 1. libcurl exposes parts of the openssl ABI, via
>CURLOPT_SSL_CTX_FUNCTION, and this would be an implicit ABI break
>without libcurl soname change.  This is not good, but it seems like
>the alternative would be to diverge our soname from everyone else's
>for the same libcurl.
> 
> 2. For the reason just mentioned, it might be a good idea to put in a
>Breaks against old versions of packages using
>CURLOPT_SSL_CTX_FUNCTION.  However, (a) I am not sure if this is
>actually necessary (b) in any case I don't have a good list of all
>the appropriate versions (c) maybe this would need coordination.
> 
> 3. This might be an implicit a "transition" (in the Debian release
>management sense) which I would be mishandling, or starting without
>permission, or something.
> 
Because of 1 I think we should change the package name (and SONAME) for
libcurl3.  I don't think 2 is appropriate.

Cheers,
Julien

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: liboptimisation-java: RM? FTBFS with Java 9, no rdeps, idle upstream

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tags 874647 + pending
Bug #874647 [liboptimization-java] liboptimisation-java: RM? FTBFS with Java 9, 
no rdeps, idle upstream
Added tag(s) pending.
> block 874647 by 883091
Bug #874647 [liboptimization-java] liboptimisation-java: RM? FTBFS with Java 9, 
no rdeps, idle upstream
874647 was not blocked by any bugs.
874647 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 874647: 883091
>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
874647: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=874647
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: netbeans FTBFS with jaxb 2.3.0

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> reassign -1 src:jaxb
Bug #882525 [src:netbeans] netbeans FTBFS with jaxb 2.3.0
Bug reassigned from package 'src:netbeans' to 'src:jaxb'.
No longer marked as found in versions netbeans/8.1+dfsg3-4.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #882525 to the same values 
previously set
> found -1 2.3.0-1
Bug #882525 [src:jaxb] netbeans FTBFS with jaxb 2.3.0
Marked as found in versions jaxb/2.3.0-1.
> forwarded -1 https://github.com/javaee/jaxb-v2/issues/1144
Bug #882525 [src:jaxb] netbeans FTBFS with jaxb 2.3.0
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://github.com/javaee/jaxb-v2/issues/1144'.
> affects -1 src:netbeans
Bug #882525 [src:jaxb] netbeans FTBFS with jaxb 2.3.0
Added indication that 882525 affects src:netbeans

-- 
882525: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=882525
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: Bug#874645: marked as done (FTBFS with Java 9: javadoc classpath)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> reopen -1
Bug #874645 {Done: Markus Koschany <a...@debian.org>} 
[src:libnative-platform-java] FTBFS with Java 9: javadoc classpath
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them.
Bug reopened
No longer marked as fixed in versions libnative-platform-java/0.14-1.

-- 
874645: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=874645
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
<http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers>. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: Bug#882271: libgradle-core-java: fail to honor maven relocations

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> forwarded -1 https://github.com/gradle/gradle/issues/1256
Bug #882271 [libgradle-core-java] libgradle-core-java: fail to honor maven 
relocations
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://github.com/gradle/gradle/issues/1256'.

-- 
882271: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=882271
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: Bug#882181: mockito: FTBFS - java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException: Cannot nest operations in the same thread

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #882181 [src:mockito] mockito: FTBFS - 
java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException: Cannot nest operations in the same 
thread
Added tag(s) confirmed.

-- 
882181: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=882181
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: Bug#881994: pdfsam: Doesn't start with libatinject-jsr330-api-java from sid

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> reassign -1 libatinject-jsr330-api-java 1.0+ds1-4
Bug #881994 [pdfsam] pdfsam: Doesn't start with libatinject-jsr330-api-java 
from sid
Bug reassigned from package 'pdfsam' to 'libatinject-jsr330-api-java'.
No longer marked as found in versions pdfsam/3.3.4-1.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #881994 to the same values 
previously set
Bug #881994 [libatinject-jsr330-api-java] pdfsam: Doesn't start with 
libatinject-jsr330-api-java from sid
Marked as found in versions atinject-jsr330/1.0+ds1-4.
> affects -1 pdfsam
Bug #881994 [libatinject-jsr330-api-java] pdfsam: Doesn't start with 
libatinject-jsr330-api-java from sid
Added indication that 881994 affects pdfsam

-- 
881994: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=881994
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: Bug#881573: scala FTBFS: A class needed by class class org.eclipse.aether.internal.ant.types.RemoteRepository cannot be found: org/codehaus/plexus/logging/AbstractLogEnabled

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> reassign -1 aether-ant-tasks
Bug #881573 [src:scala] scala FTBFS: A class needed by class class 
org.eclipse.aether.internal.ant.types.RemoteRepository cannot be found: 
org/codehaus/plexus/logging/AbstractLogEnabled
Bug reassigned from package 'src:scala' to 'aether-ant-tasks'.
No longer marked as found in versions scala/2.11.8-2.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #881573 to the same values 
previously set
> affects -1 scala
Bug #881573 [aether-ant-tasks] scala FTBFS: A class needed by class class 
org.eclipse.aether.internal.ant.types.RemoteRepository cannot be found: 
org/codehaus/plexus/logging/AbstractLogEnabled
Added indication that 881573 affects scala

-- 
881573: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=881573
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: ftbfs on armel using JamVM

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> tag -1 + wontfix
Bug #631931 [maven-site-plugin] ftbfs on armel using JamVM
Added tag(s) wontfix.
> close -1
Bug #631931 [maven-site-plugin] ftbfs on armel using JamVM
Marked Bug as done

-- 
631931: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=631931
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: Bug#880746: libmetadata-extractor-java: Manifest references xmpcore-debian.jar, but libxmpcore-java does not provide this file.

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> tags -1 pending confirmed
Bug #880746 [src:libmetadata-extractor-java] libmetadata-extractor-java: 
Manifest references xmpcore-debian.jar, but libxmpcore-java does not provide 
this file.
Added tag(s) confirmed and pending.

-- 
880746: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=880746
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

[freeplane] 06/07: update dependencies (jlatexmath, re-worked svg/pdf dependencies)

[Felix Natter]

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.

fnatter-guest pushed a commit to branch master
in repository freeplane.

commit 0b472e1aa681dc314ca3b77a9b2e86c6228913f6
Author: Felix Natter <fnat...@gmx.net>
Date:   Sat Nov 4 10:18:51 2017 +0100

update dependencies (jlatexmath, re-worked svg/pdf dependencies)
---
 debian/control | 14 ++
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
index 01bf44c..486431c 100644
--- a/debian/control
+++ b/debian/control
@@ -21,11 +21,14 @@ Build-Depends-Indep: javahelp2,
  simplyhtml (>= 0.17.3),
  libbatik-java (>= 1.9-3),
  librhino-java,
- libfop-java,
+ libfop-java (>= 2.1),
  libxerces2-java,
  libxml-commons-external-java,
+ libxmlgraphics-commons-java,
+ libavalon-framework-java,
+ libcommons-logging-java,
  libjaxp1.3-java,
- libjlatexmath-java (>= 1.0.2),
+ libjlatexmath-java (>= 1.0.6),
  libknopflerfish-osgi-framework-java (>= 6.1.1),
  libjsyntaxpane-java (>= 0.9.6~r156),
  libcommons-codec-java (>= 1.7),
@@ -51,11 +54,14 @@ Depends: ${misc:Depends},
  simplyhtml (>= 0.17.3),
  libbatik-java (>= 1.9-3),
  librhino-java,
- libfop-java,
+ libfop-java (>= 2.1),
  libxerces2-java,
  libxml-commons-external-java,
+ libxmlgraphics-commons-java,
+ libavalon-framework-java,
+ libcommons-logging-java,
  libjaxp1.3-java,
- libjlatexmath-java (>= 1.0.2),
+ libjlatexmath-java (>= 1.0.6),
  libknopflerfish-osgi-framework-java (>= 6.1.1),
  libjsyntaxpane-java (>= 0.9.6~r156),
  libcommons-codec-java (>= 1.7),

-- 
Alioth's /usr/local/bin/git-commit-notice on 
/srv/git.debian.org/git/pkg-java/freeplane.git

___
pkg-java-commits mailing list
pkg-java-comm...@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-commits

Processed: Re: FTBFS with Java 9 due to Terrible Swing

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> forwarded -1 
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnu-electric/2017-10/msg0.html
Bug #873219 [src:electric] FTBFS with Java 9 due to Terrible Swing
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 
'https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnu-electric/2017-10/msg0.html'.

-- 
873219: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=873219
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: FTBFS with Java 9 due to Terrible Swing

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tags 873219 - pending
Bug #873219 [src:electric] FTBFS with Java 9 due to Terrible Swing
Removed tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
873219: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=873219
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: FTBFS with Java 9 due to -source/-target only

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> reopen -1
Bug #873979 {Done: Markus Koschany } [src:f2j] FTBFS with Java 
9 due to -source/-target only
Bug reopened
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #873979 to the same values 
previously set

-- 
873979: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=873979
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

[libjaxen-java] 22/49: Re-enable dom4j support. We no longer split out dom4j support to the dom4j package. This introduces a circular build- and runtime dependency on dom4j, which is ok.

[Emmanuel Bourg]

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.

ebourg-guest pushed a commit to branch master
in repository libjaxen-java.

commit ae3d3f80119cfb1f37db501b6972398a7331a28d
Author: Marcus Better <mar...@better.se>
Date:   Wed Jun 6 15:37:40 2007 +

Re-enable dom4j support. We no longer split out dom4j support to the dom4j 
package. This introduces a circular build- and runtime dependency on dom4j, 
which is ok.
---
 build.xml  |  3 --
 debian/README.Debian   | 14 ++
 debian/changelog   |  1 +
 debian/control |  8 ++--
 ...0_BuildXml_DisableXomDom4J_CompileAndTest.patch | 56 --
 debian/patches/01_RemoveXomDom4jTests.patch| 38 ---
 debian/rules   |  2 +-
 src/java/test/org/jaxen/test/JaxenTests.java   |  1 +
 8 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 112 deletions(-)

diff --git a/build.xml b/build.xml
index fdc37d0..8850a6a 100644
--- a/build.xml
+++ b/build.xml
@@ -44,7 +44,6 @@
 
 
 
-  
   
   
 
@@ -100,7 +99,6 @@
   
 
   
-  
   
 
   
@@ -115,7 +113,6 @@
 
 
 
-  
   
   
 
diff --git a/debian/README.Debian b/debian/README.Debian
index 3b4100c..a04d622 100644
--- a/debian/README.Debian
+++ b/debian/README.Debian
@@ -1,14 +1,8 @@
 libjaxen-java for Debian
 
 
-Jaxen in Debian supports JDOM, DOM out of the box.
+Jaxen in Debian supports JDOM, DOM and dom4j out of the box. Support
+for XOM is disabled for the time being, since XOM has not yet been
+packaged for Debian.
 
-Due to circular dependencies which need to be solved upstream we split
-the XOM and DOM4J XPath support parts out to their respective packages
-in debian (currently there is only a dom4j package).
-
-As one needs the dom4j jar is one wants to use jaxen with dom4j there is
-no difference from a user point of view if some classes are in the dom4j jar
-instead of the jaxen jar.
-
- -- Arnaud Vandyck <av...@debian.org>, Fri Apr 15 16:31:06 2005
+ -- Marcus Better <mar...@better.se>, Wed,  6 Jun 2007 17:35:58 +0200
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 1b83b11..6d0ec09 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
 libjaxen-java (1.1.1-1) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * New upstream release. (Closes: #427224)
+  * Build-depend on libdom4j-java and re-enable DOM4J unit tests.
   * debian/control: Add XS-Vcs-* fields.
 
  -- Marcus Better <mar...@better.se>  Wed, 06 Jun 2007 17:21:05 +0200
diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
index 79f7833..10f531c 100644
--- a/debian/control
+++ b/debian/control
@@ -2,16 +2,16 @@ Source: libjaxen-java
 Section: libs
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers 
<pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org>
-Uploaders: Arnaud Vandyck <av...@debian.org>, Wolfgang Baer <wb...@gmx.de>, 
Marcus Better <mar...@better.se>
-Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 5.0.0), ant, ant-optional
-Build-Depends-Indep: java-gcj-compat-dev, junit, libjdom1-java, libxerces2-java
+Uploaders: Arnaud Vandyck <av...@debian.org>, Marcus Better <mar...@better.se>
+Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 5), ant, ant-optional
+Build-Depends-Indep: java-gcj-compat-dev, junit, libjdom1-java, 
libxerces2-java, libdom4j-java
 Standards-Version: 3.7.2
 XS-Vcs-Svn: svn://svn.debian.org/pkg-java/trunk/libjaxen-java
 XS-Vcs-Browse: http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-java/trunk/libjaxen-java/
 
 Package: libjaxen-java
 Architecture: all
-Depends: kaffe | java1-runtime | java2-runtime, libjdom1-java, libxerces2-java
+Depends: kaffe | java1-runtime | java2-runtime, libjdom1-java, 
libxerces2-java, libdom4j-java
 Suggests: java-virtual-machine
 Conflicts: libsaxpath-java
 Replaces: libsaxpath-java
diff --git a/debian/patches/00_BuildXml_DisableXomDom4J_CompileAndTest.patch 
b/debian/patches/00_BuildXml_DisableXomDom4J_CompileAndTest.patch
deleted file mode 100644
index f17ad3b..000
--- a/debian/patches/00_BuildXml_DisableXomDom4J_CompileAndTest.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,56 +0,0 @@
 build.xml.orig 2006-02-12 18:03:46.0 +0100
-+++ build.xml  2006-02-12 16:10:59.0 +0100
-@@ -44,6 +44,8 @@
- 
- 
- 
-+  
-+  
-   
- 
- 
-@@ -79,7 +81,7 @@
-   
- 
- 
--
-+
-   
-   
-   
-@@ -87,6 +89,7 @@
-   
-   
-   
-+
- 
- 
- 
-@@ -98,8 +101,9 @@
- 
-   
-   
--  
--  
-+  
-+  
-+  
- 
-   
- 
-@@ -113,6 +117,8 @@
- 
- 
- 
-+  
-+  
-   
- 
- 
-@@ -169,4 +175,4 @@
- 
- 
-   
--
-\ Kein Zeilenumbruch am Dateiende.
-+
diff --g