Il 01/02/19 19:25, Jonas Smedegaard ha scritto:
> Quoting Paolo Greppi (2019-02-01 18:52:21)
>> /usr/bin/js-beautify which is taken, I renamed it !
>
> I understand that you insist.
>
> I will not stress, and therefore now take a break from helping with this
> package for now. Good luck with it
FYI: The status of the libjs-rtcpeerconnection-shim source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: (not in testing)
Current version: 1.2.14-3
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multip
FYI: The status of the node-define-property source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1.0.0-1
Current version: 2.0.2-1
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you
FYI: The status of the libjs-sdp source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: (not in testing)
Current version: 2.9.0-4
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you w
node-cssstyle 0.2.14-1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2019-02-16
It is affected by these RC bugs:
742347: node-cssstyle: node-jsdom: require("jsdom") does not work in nodejs:
missing cssstyle module
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net
ht
FYI: The status of the libjs-webrtc-adapter source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: (not in testing)
Current version: 7.2.0-2
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times
Your message dated Sat, 02 Feb 2019 01:50:56 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#912168: fixed in node-marked-man 0.4.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #912168,
regarding node-marked breaks node-marked-man autopkgtest
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2019 02:12:42 +0100
Source: node-marked-man
Architecture: source
Version: 0.4.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Javascript Maintainers
Changed-By: Jérémy Lal
Closes: 912168
Cha
node-marked-man_0.4.0-1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
node-marked-man_0.4.0-1.dsc
node-marked-man_0.4.0.orig.tar.gz
node-marked-man_0.4.0-1.debian.tar.xz
node-marked-man_0.4.0-1_source.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2019 22:52:25 +0100
Source: node-typescript
Binary: node-typescript
Architecture: source all
Version: 3.3.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Javascript Maintainers
Changed-By: Ju
node-typescript_3.3.1-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
node-typescript_3.3.1-1.dsc
node-typescript_3.3.1.orig.tar.gz
node-typescript_3.3.1-1.debian.tar.xz
node-typescript_3.3.1-1_all.deb
node-typescript_3.3.1-1_amd64.buildinfo
Greetings,
Y
Your message dated Fri, 01 Feb 2019 21:35:33 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#921074: fixed in nodejs 10.15.1~dfsg-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #921074,
regarding libnode-dev: missing dependency libssl-dev
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been d
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2019 22:18:18 +0100
Source: nodejs
Architecture: source
Version: 10.15.1~dfsg-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Javascript Maintainers
Changed-By: Jérémy Lal
Closes: 921074
Chang
nodejs_10.15.1~dfsg-2_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
nodejs_10.15.1~dfsg-2.dsc
nodejs_10.15.1~dfsg-2.debian.tar.xz
nodejs_10.15.1~dfsg-2_source.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
--
Pkg-javascri
Quoting Paolo Greppi (2019-02-01 18:52:21)
> Le 01/02/2019 à 15:34, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit :
>> If you mean the executable, then please simply avoid installing
>> instead: We can then consider later - without stress - if needed at
>> all and if so which of them is more suitably renamed).
> IMH
Le ven. 1 févr. 2019 à 18:52, Paolo Greppi a
écrit :
> Il 01/02/19 16:59, Xavier ha scritto:
> > Le Vendredi, Février 01, 2019 16:49 CET, Jonas Smedegaard <
> jo...@jones.dk> a écrit:
> >
> >> Quoting Xavier (2019-02-01 16:30:01)
> >>> Le 01/02/2019 à 15:34, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit :
> Quot
Le 01/02/2019 à 18:52, Paolo Greppi a écrit :
> Il 01/02/19 16:59, Xavier ha scritto:
>> Le Vendredi, Février 01, 2019 16:49 CET, Jonas Smedegaard a
>> écrit:
>>
>>> Quoting Xavier (2019-02-01 16:30:01)
Le 01/02/2019 à 15:34, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit :
> Quoting Xavier (2019-02-01 15:
Il 01/02/19 16:59, Xavier ha scritto:
> Le Vendredi, Février 01, 2019 16:49 CET, Jonas Smedegaard a
> écrit:
>
>> Quoting Xavier (2019-02-01 16:30:01)
>>> Le 01/02/2019 à 15:34, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit :
Quoting Xavier (2019-02-01 15:16:39)
> Le 01/02/2019 à 14:57, Paolo Greppi a écr
Le Vendredi, Février 01, 2019 16:49 CET, Jonas Smedegaard a
écrit:
> Quoting Xavier (2019-02-01 16:30:01)
> > Le 01/02/2019 à 15:34, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit :
> > > Quoting Xavier (2019-02-01 15:16:39)
> > >> Le 01/02/2019 à 14:57, Paolo Greppi a écrit :
> > >>> Hi, I have prepared an update
Quoting Xavier (2019-02-01 16:30:01)
> Le 01/02/2019 à 15:34, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit :
> > Quoting Xavier (2019-02-01 15:16:39)
> >> Le 01/02/2019 à 14:57, Paolo Greppi a écrit :
> >>> Hi, I have prepared an update to node-js-beautify to close this bug
> >>> quickly:
> >>> http://bugs.debian.org
Le 01/02/2019 à 15:34, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit :
> Quoting Xavier (2019-02-01 15:16:39)
>> Le 01/02/2019 à 14:57, Paolo Greppi a écrit :
>>> Hi, I have prepared an update to node-js-beautify to close this bug quickly:
>>> http://bugs.debian.org/888903
>>>
>>> I have opted for not updating it to 1.
Quoting Xavier (2019-02-01 15:16:39)
> Le 01/02/2019 à 14:57, Paolo Greppi a écrit :
> > Hi, I have prepared an update to node-js-beautify to close this bug quickly:
> > http://bugs.debian.org/888903
> >
> > I have opted for not updating it to 1.8.9 because ATM its build-rdepends
> > node-postcss
Le 01/02/2019 à 14:57, Paolo Greppi a écrit :
> Hi, I have prepared an update to node-js-beautify to close this bug quickly:
> http://bugs.debian.org/888903
>
> I have opted for not updating it to 1.8.9 because ATM its build-rdepends
> node-postcss is at version 6.0.23 which we know work fine wit
Hi, I have prepared an update to node-js-beautify to close this bug quickly:
http://bugs.debian.org/888903
I have opted for not updating it to 1.8.9 because ATM its build-rdepends
node-postcss is at version 6.0.23 which we know work fine with js-beautify
1.7.5.
When we update node-postcss we can
Hello,
this package is the first full use of pkg-js-tools and
pkg-js-autopkgtest. To test it, install autodep8 from unstable else only
one autopkgtest test is played.
Main points:
* debian/rules: dh --with nodejs
* debian/control:
- Testsuite: autopkgtest-pkg-nodejs (optional, autodep8 will
Your message dated Fri, 01 Feb 2019 13:05:14 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#742347: fixed in node-cssstyle 0.2.14-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #742347,
regarding node-jsdom: require("jsdom") does not work in nodejs: missing
cssstyle module
to be marked as done.
This means that
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 node-cssstyle
Bug #742347 [node-jsdom] node-jsdom: require("jsdom") does not work in nodejs:
missing cssstyle module
Bug reassigned from package 'node-jsdom' to 'node-cssstyle'.
No longer marked as found in versions node-jsdom/0.8.10+dfsg1-1.
Ignoring re
Control: reassign -1 node-cssstyle
node-jsdom debian/control has a node-cssstyle dependency. However a
simple test shows that cssstyle is unusable:
$ node -e 'require("cssstyle")'
internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:583
throw err;
^
Error: Cannot find module 'cssom'
at Function.Module._re
Package: libnode-dev
Version: 10.15.1~dfsg-1
Severity: important
I think the dependency on libssl-dev is important to add.
Isn't it ?
-- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64
29 matches
Mail list logo
