[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#976331: Bug#976331: [JS Policy] what to set in "Provides" field ?

Le 03/12/2020 à 18:21, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > Quoting Xavier (2020-12-03 17:33:18) >> Le 03/12/2020 à 16:36, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : >>> Quoting Xavier (2020-12-03 15:44:48) >>>> Le 03/12/2020 à 15:12, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : >>>>> Quoting

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#976331: Bug#976331: Bug#976331: [JS Policy] what to set in "Provides" field ?

Le 03/12/2020 à 19:17, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > Quoting Xavier (2020-12-03 18:42:17) >> Le 03/12/2020 à 18:21, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : >>> Quoting Xavier (2020-12-03 17:33:18) >>>> Le 03/12/2020 à 16:36, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : >>>>> Quoting

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#976341: Bug#976341: node-jest: please provide real (not virtual) package node-jest-worker

Le 03/12/2020 à 19:05, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > Quoting Xavier (2020-12-03 18:30:54) >> Control: tags -1 + confirmed >> >> Le 03/12/2020 à 18:07, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : >>> node-rollup-plugin-terser has a runtime dependency on >>> node-jest-worker

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974648: Bug#974648: Please really ship TypeScript definitions

Le 13/11/2020 à 12:04, Xavier a écrit : > Le 13/11/2020 à 11:26, Julien Puydt a écrit : >> Package: jest >> Version: 26.6.3+ds+~cs64.27.30-1 >> >> The file /usr/share/nodejs/package.json says the TypeScript definitions >> are available in build/jest.d.ts, but

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#976341: Bug#976341: Bug#976341: node-jest: please provide real (not virtual) package node-jest-worker

Le 04/12/2020 à 15:32, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > Quoting Xavier (2020-12-04 11:48:58) >> Le 03/12/2020 à 19:05, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : >>> Quoting Xavier (2020-12-03 18:30:54) >>>> Le 03/12/2020 à 18:07, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : >>>>> Please

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#976341: Bug#976341: Bug#976341: node-jest: please provide real (not virtual) package node-jest-worker

Le 04/12/2020 à 15:32, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > Quoting Xavier (2020-12-04 11:48:58) >> Le 03/12/2020 à 19:05, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : >>> Quoting Xavier (2020-12-03 18:30:54) >>>> Le 03/12/2020 à 18:07, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : >>>>> Please

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#976409: glibc breaks node-iconv autopkgtest: AssertionError [ERR_ASSERTION]: Missing expected exception

Control: tags -1 + ftbfs Le 04/12/2020 à 20:46, Paul Gevers a écrit : > Source: glibc, node-iconv > Control: found -1 glibc/2.31-5 > Control: found -1 node-iconv/2.3.5-4 > Severity: serious > Tags: sid bullseye > X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org > User: debian...@lists.debian.org > Usertag

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Nodejs little module policy

Le 04/12/2020 à 22:10, Joerg Jaspert a écrit : > On 15972 March 1977, Xavier wrote: > >> Following a JS discussion (#976341), I proposed a new node-jest in NEW >> queue that splits it into multiple binary packages. > > I've seen that and skipped on the package i

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#976607: Bug#976607: node-cheerio: please package (much!) newer release 1.0rc3

Control: tags -1 + pending Le 05/12/2020 à 19:19, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > Package: node-cheerio > Version: 0.22.0-2 > Severity: normal > > Hi, > > Thanks for packaging Cheerio. > > Currently packaged release is the latest upstream stable release, > but was released 4 years ago . 1.0rc1 was

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974648: Bug#974648: Bug#974648: Please really ship TypeScript definitions

Le 04/12/2020 à 14:47, Xavier a écrit : > Le 13/11/2020 à 12:04, Xavier a écrit : >> Le 13/11/2020 à 11:26, Julien Puydt a écrit : >>> Package: jest >>> Version: 26.6.3+ds+~cs64.27.30-1 >>> >>> The file /usr/share/nodejs/package.json says the Type

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#976618: Bug#976618: node-cosmiconfig, jest: embedded module tied to large (build-)dependency tree

Le 05/12/2020 à 22:22, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > Package: node-cosmiconfig,jest > Severity: normal > > Both node-cosmiconfig and jest embed Nodejs module callsites. > > jest provides it as virtual package node-callsites, > but jest has a much larger (build-dependency tree. > > Please consider

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#976618: Bug#976618: Bug#976618: node-cosmiconfig, jest: embedded module tied to large (build-)dependency tree

Le 05/12/2020 à 22:48, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > Quoting Xavier (2020-12-05 22:34:06) >> Le 05/12/2020 à 22:22, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : >>> Package: node-cosmiconfig,jest >>> Severity: normal >>> >>> Both node-cosmiconfig and jest embed Nodejs

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#976618: Bug#976618: Bug#976618: node-cosmiconfig, jest: embedded module tied to large (build-)dependency tree

Le 05/12/2020 à 22:48, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > Quoting Xavier (2020-12-05 22:34:06) >> Le 05/12/2020 à 22:22, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : >>> Package: node-cosmiconfig,jest >>> Severity: normal >>> >>> Both node-cosmiconfig and jest embed Nodejs

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#976331: [JS Policy] what to set in "Provides" field ?

Le 06/12/2020 à 02:14, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > Quoting Xavier (2020-12-03 21:19:48) >> Le 03/12/2020 à 19:17, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : >>> Quoting Xavier (2020-12-03 18:42:17) >>>> Le 03/12/2020 à 18:21, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : >>>>> Quoting

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974587: node-uuid: Bad "exports" field?

Le Lundi, Décembre 07, 2020 13:55 CET, Pirate Praveen a écrit: > On Thu, 12 Nov 2020 16:25:14 +0100 Xavier Guimard > wrote: > > node-uuid breaks dependent package with error like: > > > > Package subpath './v1' is not defined by "exports&quo

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#976813: Bug#976813: node-cosmiconfig: missing Breaks+Replaces: jest (<< 26.6.3+repack)

version. > But you also need matching Replaces to properly move files between packages > (the Breaks alone could also be satisfied by simply deconfiguring jest). Hi, what is wrong in "Breaks: jest (<< 2.26.3+repack~), node-jest-debbundle (<< 2.26.3+repack~)" ? Jest vers

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#976813: Bug#976813: node-cosmiconfig: missing Breaks+Replaces: jest (<< 26.6.3+repack)

Le 08/12/2020 à 10:12, Andreas Beckmann a écrit : > On 12/8/20 9:44 AM, Xavier wrote: >> what is wrong in "Breaks: jest (<< 2.26.3+repack~), node-jest-debbundle >> (<< 2.26.3+repack~)" ? Jest version in unstable is >> "26.6.3+repack+~cs61.38

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#976813: Bug#976813: Bug#976813: node-cosmiconfig: missing Breaks+Replaces: jest (<< 26.6.3+repack)

Le 08/12/2020 à 10:04, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > Quoting Xavier (2020-12-08 09:44:00) >> Le 08/12/2020 à 09:37, Andreas Beckmann a écrit : >>> Package: node-cosmiconfig >>> Version: 7.0.0+~cs8.3.2-1 >>> Severity: serious >>> User: debian...@lists

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#976813: Bug#976813: Bug#976813: node-cosmiconfig: missing Breaks+Replaces: jest (<< 26.6.3+repack)

Le 08/12/2020 à 10:32, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > Quoting Jonas Smedegaard (2020-12-08 10:04:13) >> Quoting Xavier (2020-12-08 09:44:00) >>> what is wrong in "Breaks: jest (<< 2.26.3+repack~), node-jest-debbundle >>> (<< 2.26.3+repack~)"

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#976813: Bug#976813: Bug#976813: Bug#976813: node-cosmiconfig: missing Breaks+Replaces: jest (<< 26.6.3+repack)

Le Mardi, Décembre 08, 2020 11:07 CET, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit: > Quoting Xavier (2020-12-08 10:47:20) > > Thanks, I had to replace "ds" by "repack" since checksum decreased: I > > removed a useless component. > > For future sake, "ds"

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#976813: Bug#976813: Bug#976813: Bug#976813: node-cosmiconfig: missing Breaks+Replaces: jest (<< 26.6.3+repack)

Le Mardi, Décembre 08, 2020 11:38 CET, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit: > Quoting Xavier (2020-12-08 11:33:40) > > Le Mardi, Décembre 08, 2020 11:07 CET, Jonas Smedegaard a > > écrit: > > > > > Quoting Xavier (2020-12-08 10:47:20) > > > > Thanks, I had

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974648: Bug#974648: Bug#974648: Bug#974648: Please really ship TypeScript definitions

Le 05/12/2020 à 22:16, Xavier a écrit : > > > Le 04/12/2020 à 14:47, Xavier a écrit : >> Le 13/11/2020 à 12:04, Xavier a écrit : >>> Le 13/11/2020 à 11:26, Julien Puydt a écrit : >>>> Package: jest >>>> Version: 26.6.3+ds+~cs64.27.30-1 >>&g

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Ask to do some quick maintenance on jquery-timepicker

Le 09/12/2020 à 01:39, William Desportes a écrit : > Hi, > > I would like to ask to do some quick maintenance on jquery-timepicker > package. Hi, what is your salsa account ? > We use the library jquery-timepicker at phpMyAdmin, and to use this > package I need the latest version to be up to da

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#977269: Bug#977269: node-rollup-plugin-terser seems incompatible with current node-terser

Le 13/12/2020 à 22:00, Xavier a écrit : > Le 13/12/2020 à 20:53, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : >> Control: severity 977269 important >> Control: tags 977269 +moreinfo +unreproducible >> >> Quoting Jonas Smedegaard (2020-12-13 20:29:46) >>> Quoting Jonas Smedegaar

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#977269: Bug#977269: node-rollup-plugin-terser seems incompatible with current node-terser

Le 13/12/2020 à 20:53, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > Control: severity 977269 important > Control: tags 977269 +moreinfo +unreproducible > > Quoting Jonas Smedegaard (2020-12-13 20:29:46) >> Quoting Jonas Smedegaard (2020-12-13 17:22:05) >>> Quoting Xavier G

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#977269: Bug#977269: Bug#977269: node-rollup-plugin-terser seems incompatible with current node-terser

Control: fixed -1 7.0.2-3 Control: tags -1 + confirmed Le 13/12/2020 à 22:52, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > Quoting Xavier (2020-12-13 22:00:53) >> Le 13/12/2020 à 20:53, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : >>> Control: severity 977269 important >>> Control: tags 97726

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Please reject node-gyp-build

s and don't use on-the-fly compilation, then this package is useless. I removed this dependency from node-websocket using a simple patch [1] So please reject node-gyp-build. Cheers, Xavier [1]: https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-websocket/-/blob/master/debian/patches/remove-dependency-t

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#977535: Bug#977535: pkg-js-tools should create node_modules symlink in autopkgtest

Le 16/12/2020 à 08:17, Pirate Praveen a écrit : > Package: pkg-js-tools,node-d3-geo > Severity: important > > node-d3-geo autopkgtest is failing with > > Error: Cannot find module '@babel/register' > > https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/n/node-d3-geo/8873707/log.gz >

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#977535: Bug#977535: pkg-js-tools should create node_modules symlink in autopkgtest

Le 16/12/2020 à 11:56, Pirate Praveen a écrit : > Control: clone -1 -2 > Control: reassign -2 pkg-js-tools > Control: retitle -2 use cp -rL for extcopies (needed for symlinks) > Control: reassign node-d3-geo,pkg-js-tools,node-tape > > On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 8:27 am, Xa

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#977535: Bug#977535: Bug#977535: pkg-js-tools should create node_modules symlink in autopkgtest

Le 16/12/2020 à 12:05, Xavier a écrit : > Le 16/12/2020 à 11:56, Pirate Praveen a écrit : >> Control: clone -1 -2 >> Control: reassign -2 pkg-js-tools >> Control: retitle -2 use cp -rL for extcopies (needed for symlinks) >> Control: reassign node-d3-geo,pkg-js-tools,nod

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#977535: Bug#977535: Bug#977535: Bug#977535: pkg-js-tools should create node_modules symlink in autopkgtest

Le 16/12/2020 à 12:38, Pirate Praveen a écrit : > > > On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 12:15 pm, Xavier wrote: >> Could you try pkg-js-autopkgtest 0.9.55 (experimental + salsa) ? > > No, this did not work. I don't see any cp command in the logs. > > autopkgtest [17

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#977535: Bug#977535: Bug#977535: Bug#977535: Bug#977535: pkg-js-tools should create node_modules symlink in autopkgtest

Le 16/12/2020 à 13:07, Xavier a écrit : > Le 16/12/2020 à 12:38, Pirate Praveen a écrit : >> >> >> On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 12:15 pm, Xavier wrote: >>> Could you try pkg-js-autopkgtest 0.9.55 (experimental + salsa) ? >> >> No, this did not wo

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#977535: Bug#977535: Bug#977535: Bug#977535: pkg-js-tools should create node_modules symlink in autopkgtest

Le 16/12/2020 à 13:14, Pirate Praveen a écrit : > > > On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 1:07 pm, Xavier wrote: >> I didn't add an "echo" but debian/nodejs/extcopies are really copied >> (verified). Add a `ls node_modules` in your debian/tests/pkg-js/test if >&g

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#977535: Bug#977535: Bug#977535: Bug#977535: pkg-js-tools should create node_modules symlink in autopkgtest

Le 16/12/2020 à 13:14, Pirate Praveen a écrit : > > > On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 1:07 pm, Xavier wrote: >> I didn't add an "echo" but debian/nodejs/extcopies are really copied >> (verified). Add a `ls node_modules` in your debian/tests/pkg-js/test if >&g

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#977535: Bug#977535: Bug#977535: Bug#977535: pkg-js-tools should create node_modules symlink in autopkgtest

Control: reopen -1 Control: tags -1 + confirmed Le 16/12/2020 à 13:40, Pirate Praveen a écrit : > > > On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 1:38 pm, Xavier wrote: >> Your test modules are not built: >> >> $ node -e 'require("./debian/tests/test_modules/topojson-client

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#977535: Bug#977535: Bug#977535: Bug#977535: pkg-js-tools should create node_modules symlink in autopkgtest

Le 16/12/2020 à 13:59, Pirate Praveen a écrit : > > > On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 1:55 pm, Xavier wrote: >> No, this fails with an sbuild, except with nocheck of course. > > It built fine for me as well as on the official buildd normally (without > enabling nocheck). >

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#977535: Bug#977535: Bug#977535: Bug#977535: pkg-js-tools should create node_modules symlink in autopkgtest

Le 16/12/2020 à 14:39, Pirate Praveen a écrit : > > > On 2020, ഡിസംബർ 16 6:45:06 PM IST, Xavier wrote: >> import tape from "tape"; >> ^^ >> >> SyntaxError: Cannot use import statement outside a module > > We need .babelrc too. > > htt

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#977535: Bug#977535: Bug#977535: Bug#977535: Bug#977535: pkg-js-tools should create node_modules symlink in autopkgtest

Le 16/12/2020 à 14:59, Xavier a écrit : > Le 16/12/2020 à 14:39, Pirate Praveen a écrit : >> >> >> On 2020, ഡിസംബർ 16 6:45:06 PM IST, Xavier wrote: >>> import tape from "tape"; >>> ^^ >>> >>> SyntaxError: Cannot use import

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#977663: Bug#977663: Possible rearrangement of binary packages

Le 18/12/2020 à 13:44, Pirate Praveen a écrit : > Package: node-babel7 > Version: 7.12.11+~cs150.141.84-1 > Severity: wishlist > > @babel/runtime and @babel/standalone is targetted at browsers and used > as runtime dependencies unlike the rest of babel (all others are used as > build dependencies)

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#977677: Bug#977677: FTBFS: dependency to node-babel-runtime >=7 isn't understood by deb tools

Le 18/12/2020 à 18:38, Xavier Guimard a écrit : > Package: node-regenerator-transform > Version: 0.14.5-2 > Severity: serious > Tags: ftbfs > > Since 0.14.5-2, dependency to node-babel7 was replaced by a dependency to > node-babel-runtime (>= 7) which is provided by: >

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#977677: Bug#977677: Bug#977677: FTBFS: dependency to node-babel-runtime >=7 isn't understood by deb tools

Le 18/12/2020 à 20:09, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > Quoting Xavier (2020-12-18 18:45:30) >> Please launch autopkgtest before uploading such changes to avoid >> problems. > > Yes, I fully agree. > > I generally run autopkgtest at every build + compare with debdiff

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#977677: Bug#977677: Bug#977677: Bug#977677: FTBFS: dependency to node-babel-runtime >=7 isn't understood by deb tools

Le 18/12/2020 à 21:37, Xavier a écrit : > Le 18/12/2020 à 20:09, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : >> Quoting Xavier (2020-12-18 18:45:30) >>> Please launch autopkgtest before uploading such changes to avoid >>> problems. >> >> Yes, I fully agree. >>

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-jest_26.6.3+repack+~cs61.38.31-3_sourceonly.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Le 18/12/2020 à 19:24, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > Quoting Debian FTP Masters (2020-12-18 18:34:31) >> Changes: >> node-jest (26.6.3+repack+~cs61.38.31-3) unstable; urgency=medium >> . >>* Explicitly (build-)depend on needed babel modules (Closes: #977670) > > Something undocumented happene

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#977685: Bug#977685: node-jest: build routines are too brittle: build failures go undetected

ee that this directory contains 4 very big .gif! So closing this bug, this is not a bug but an improvement of pkg-js-tools! Thanks to have looked at this. Cheers, Xavier -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#924809: Bugs come from conflict between node-uglify and node-uglify-js

Control: reassign 924807 uglify-js Control: reassign 924809 uglify-js Control: merge 924807 924809 Bug seems to come from conflict between https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/uglify-js and https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/uglifyjs: webpack can't now be installed with uglifyjs Le 17/03/2019 à 19:05, Luc

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#924807: Bug#924807: Bugs come from conflict between node-uglify and node-uglify-js

Le 17/03/2019 à 23:12, Xavier a écrit : > Bug seems to come from conflict between > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/uglify-js and > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/uglifyjs: webpack can't now be installed > with uglifyjs node-jscharset build-depends on both webpack and uglifyjs:

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#924807: Bug#924807: Bug#924807: Bugs come from conflict between node-uglify and node-uglify-js

Le 18/03/2019 à 00:02, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > Quoting Jonas Smedegaard (2019-03-17 23:48:57) >> Quoting Xavier (2019-03-17 23:12:51) >>> Control: reassign 924807 uglify-js >>> Control: reassign 924809 uglify-js >>> Control: merge 924807 924809 >>>

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#924807: Bug#924807: Bug#924807: Bug#924807: Bugs come from conflict between node-uglify and node-uglify-js

Le 18/03/2019 à 06:19, Xavier a écrit : > Le 18/03/2019 à 00:02, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : >> Quoting Jonas Smedegaard (2019-03-17 23:48:57) >>> Quoting Xavier (2019-03-17 23:12:51) >>>> Control: reassign 924807 uglify-js >>>> Control: reassign 924809 u

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#924807: Bugs come from conflict between node-uglify and node-uglify-js

Le 18/03/2019 à 11:46, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > Quoting Xavier (2019-03-18 06:56:42) >> Le 18/03/2019 à 06:19, Xavier a écrit : >>> Le 18/03/2019 à 00:02, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : >>>> Quoting Jonas Smedegaard (2019-03-17 23:48:57) >>>>> Quotin

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#925517: Bug#925517: Non-NSA/Microsoft upstream repo, new version

Le 26/03/2019 à 08:07, Jeffrey Cliff a écrit : > Package: node-progress > Version: 1.1.8-1 > Severity: normal > > As NSA/Microsoft has taken over Github, it is long since time to move to > a non-Microsoft source for projects like node-progress.  I have made a > non-microsoft repo at salsa > at htt

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Giuseppe Pereira Interesting to join js-team

proceed? Hello, join us on https://salsa.debian.org/js-team and read our docs: * https://wiki.debian.org/Javascript * https://wiki.debian.org/Javascript/Tutorial Cheers, Xavier -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#925517: Bug#925517: Non-NSA/Microsoft upstream repo, new version

Le 26/03/2019 à 17:53, Jeffrey Cliff a écrit : > I don't use NSA/Microsoft github so I'll assume you mean to update the > readme in the repo I control, which I have added a note to.  Is there > anything in specific you are interested in my adding? > > On Tue, 26

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#925517: Bug#925517: Non-NSA/Microsoft upstream repo, new version

Le 26/03/2019 à 19:04, Jeffrey Cliff a écrit : > 2.0.0 was the version when Microsoft captured Github.  That's the newest > one I have, but thankfully that's as new as is needed by the version of > eslint in RFP. > > I prefer to do my contributions anonymously.  I am not the author. > >> Followin

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#925517: Bug#925517: Non-NSA/Microsoft upstream repo, new version

Le 26/03/2019 à 20:17, Jeffrey Cliff a écrit : > As maintainer, that's up to you, but I do not accept any project hosted > in the NSA/Microsoft walled garden as the legitimate upstream of > anything and I will continue to host 'progress', in particular, > somewhere, until a 2.0.0+ version is availa

[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-yamljs updated

Hello, I updated node-yamljs, please check my changes to see if all is OK and ready to push. Following our policy, source package should be renamed yamljs.js (provides node-yamljs and libjs-yamljs). Cheers, Xavier https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-yamljs -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-yamljs updated

Le 30/03/2019 à 12:39, Xavier a écrit : > Hello, > > I updated node-yamljs, please check my changes to see if all is OK and > ready to push. > > Following our policy, source package should be renamed yamljs.js > (provides node-yamljs and libjs-yamljs). > >

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Request for review: src:node-ansi-up

d an update > * upstream tests pass Modified to use pkg-js-tools and so enable upstream test in autopkgtest > * debian/tests/require is successful Removed and replaced by pkg-js-tools/pkg-js-autopkgtest It looks good now for me Cheers, Xavier > What is not done: > > * I

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#926616: Bug#926616: CVE-2018-3750: Prototype Pollution

Control: tags -1 + security Le 08/04/2019 à 00:22, Jeff Cliff a écrit : > Package: node-deep-extend > Version: 0.4.1-1 > Severity: important > > Dear Maintainer, > > As per the ubuntu bug report: > > from https://snyk.io/vuln/npm:deep-extend:20180409 : > > deep-extend "all the listed modules

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#926616: Fwd: Bug#926650 closed by Ivo De Decker (unblock node-deep-extend)

node-deep-extend 0.4.1-2 is unblocked Message transféré Sujet : Bug#926650 closed by Ivo De Decker (unblock node-deep-extend) Date : Mon, 08 Apr 2019 14:36:04 + De : Debian Bug Tracking System Répondre à : 926...@bugs.debian.org Pour : Xavier Guimard This is an

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#926720: Bug#926720: node-miller-rabin: FTBFS randomly (uses a non-prime to test the test)

Le 09/04/2019 à 21:16, Jakub Wilk a écrit : > * Santiago Vila , 2019-04-09, 15:32: >> AFAIK, this being a primality test, I assume the outcome is either >> "not prime" or "maybe prime", so the only way to test the test is by >> giving a known prime and expect "maybe prime" as output. >> >> So: Why

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#926720: Bug#926720: node-miller-rabin: FTBFS randomly (uses a non-prime to test the test)

Le 09/04/2019 à 22:14, Santiago Vila a écrit : > On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 09:31:07PM +0200, Xavier wrote: > >>> NB, it's been already reported upstream that the number of iterations >>> this implementation chooses in not adequate: >>> https://github.com/indut

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Request to join the Debian JavaScript Maintainers group

Le 13/04/2019 à 08:11, Debian GitLab a écrit : > Graham Inggs requested Developer > access to the Debian JavaScript Maintainers > group. Welcome on board ! -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascr

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Request to join the Debian JavaScript Maintainers group

Le 13/04/2019 à 10:00, Graham Inggs a écrit : > I intend to fix the autopkgtests of the packages below. I'll also > update the VCS for Salsa at the same time. Please let me know if > there are any objections. > > node-ansi > node-archy > node-bl > node-clarinet > node-content-disposition > node-

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#927015: Bug#927015: node-serve-static: FTBFS (failing tests)

Control: tags -1 + confirmed Le 13/04/2019 à 18:17, Santiago Vila a écrit : > Package: src:node-serve-static > Version: 1.6.4-2 > Severity: serious > Tags: ftbfs > > Dear maintainer: > > I tried to build this package in buster but it failed: > > -

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#927034: simile-timeline: lack of Japan's new era 令和 (Reiwa)

t embeds an old version of JQuery (1.2.6). Perhaps this should not be included in Buster. Cc to uploaders. Cheers, Xavier $ apt-cache rdepends --recurse libjs-simile-timeline libjs-simile-timeline Reverse Depends: debian-timeline debian-timeline Reverse Depends: Changes: * Team

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#927034: simile-timeline: lack of Japan's new era 令和 (Reiwa)

Le 14/04/2019 à 09:15, Xavier a écrit : > Le 14/04/2019 à 01:01, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu a écrit : >> Source: simile-timeline >> Version: 2.3.0+dfsg1-2 >> Severity: important >> >> Dear Maintainer, >> >> Japan's new era 令和 (Reiwa) will be started at 201

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Request to join the Debian JavaScript Maintainers group

Le 14/04/2019 à 09:14, Graham Inggs a écrit : > On Sat, 13 Apr 2019 at 12:03, Xavier wrote: >> No problem for me. Please use pkg-js-tools for tests and autopkgtest >> (https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/pkg-js-tools/tree/master/doc/autopkgtest#readme). > > Thanks for the

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#927034: simile-timeline: lack of Japan's new era 令和 (Reiwa)

Le 14/04/2019 à 17:26, W. Martin Borgert a écrit : > On 2019-04-14 09:15, Xavier wrote: >> I updated this package to add Reiwa Era and some other things. However, >> I found that it embeds an old version of JQuery (1.2.6). Perhaps this >> should not be included in Buster. &g

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] jquery_3.3.1~dfsg-2_sourceonly.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

ript Maintainers > > Changed-By: Xavier Guimard > Closes: 927385 > Changes: > jquery (3.3.1~dfsg-2) unstable; urgency=medium > . >* Team upload >* Add patch to prevent Object.prototype pollution (Closes: #927385) >* Upgrade links to https > > Thank y

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#927254: Bug#927254: libjs-vue-router: ships node module instead of browser one

Le 17/04/2019 à 00:44, Dmitry Bogatov a écrit : > > Package: libjs-vue-router > Version: 3.0.2+ds-1 > Severity: normal > > Dear Maintainer, > > I am working on packaging Laminar CI system, and libjs-vue-router is one > of its dependencies. Upstream build system of Laminar downloads its > depende

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#927716: CVE-2018-1109

Le 21/04/2019 à 22:33, Moritz Muehlenhoff a écrit : > Package: node-braces > Severity: important > Tags: security > > Please see https://snyk.io/vuln/npm:braces:20180219 > > Patch: > https://github.com/micromatch/braces/commit/abdafb0cae1e0c00f184abbadc692f4eaa98f451 > > Cheers, > Moritz

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#927716: Bug#927716: CVE-2018-1109

Le 21/04/2019 à 22:33, Moritz Muehlenhoff a écrit : > Package: node-braces > Severity: important > Tags: security > > Please see https://snyk.io/vuln/npm:braces:20180219 > > Patch: > https://github.com/micromatch/braces/commit/abdafb0cae1e0c00f184abbadc692f4eaa98f451 > > Cheers, > Moritz

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#927716: Bug#927716: Bug#927716: CVE-2018-1109

Control: tags -1 + moreinfo Le 22/04/2019 à 07:38, Xavier a écrit : > Le 21/04/2019 à 22:33, Moritz Muehlenhoff a écrit : >> Package: node-braces >> Severity: important >> Tags: security >> >> Please see https://snyk.io/vuln/npm:braces:20180219 >> >> P

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#927716: CVE-2018-1109

Le 25/04/2019 à 13:41, Xavier a écrit : > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo > > Le 22/04/2019 à 07:38, Xavier a écrit : >> Le 21/04/2019 à 22:33, Moritz Muehlenhoff a écrit : >>> Package: node-braces >>> Severity: important >>> Tags: security >>> >

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#927716: Bug#927716: CVE-2018-1109

Le 26/04/2019 à 19:40, Xavier a écrit : > [...] > Hello, > > The regex that causes CVE-2018-1109 was introduced in upstream version > 2.2.0, commit dcc1acab [1]. So Buster node-braces seems not concerned by > this CVE. > > https://snyk.io/vuln/npm:braces:20180219 extract

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Strange license : not DSFG-compliant, but...

Le 08/05/2019 à 10:45, Julien Puydt a écrit : > Hi, > > I think it just doesn't make sense : > http://jscolor.com/download/ > > in any case, it certainly isn't DFSG-compliant. > > Still, I'd like some feedback on the matter... if only to understand the > situation better before I try to get in

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#928645: Bug#928645: RFI: replacement of touch module with fs

Le 08/05/2019 à 11:22, Xavier a écrit : > Le 08/05/2019 à 10:49, Ritesh Raj Sarraf a écrit : >> Package: node-lockfile >> Version: 1.0.4 >> Severity: normal >> >> Hi, >> >> This is mostly about trying to determine the reason for the change. >>

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#928645: Bug#928645: RFI: replacement of touch module with fs

Le 08/05/2019 à 10:49, Ritesh Raj Sarraf a écrit : > Package: node-lockfile > Version: 1.0.4 > Severity: normal > > Hi, > > This is mostly about trying to determine the reason for the change. > I noticed that in patch `remove-touch.patch`, the requirement for `touch` > module is worked around by

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] nmu: node-unicode-*

Le 09/05/2019 à 13:01, Paul Gevers a écrit : > ... > This package is arch:all. Somebody needs to do a source upload. > > There is a newer version already in unstable than in buster, so don't > expect this package to migrate to buster. > > Paul Hi all, Please stop uploading new versions to unsta

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#928827: Bug#928827: libjs-jquery: Minified version of jquery.js (jquery.min.js) throws syntax error

Control: fixed -1 3.1.1-1 Control: notfound -1 1.7.2+dfsg-3.2 Control: tags -1 confirmed Le 11/05/2019 à 21:52, Harald Oest a écrit : > Package: libjs-jquery > Version: 1.7.2+dfsg-3.2+deb8u6 > Severity: normal > > Dear Maintainer, > > the minified jquery library ('/usr/share/javascript/jquery/jq

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Using GroupedSources for gulp

Le 19/05/2019 à 16:34, Pirate Praveen a écrit : > Hi, > > I have been using > https://wiki.debian.org/Javascript/Nodejs/Npm2Deb/Embedding till now. > > I want to try to use > https://wiki.debian.org/Javascript/GroupSourcesTutorial for gulp 4.0 (to > embed gulp-cli 2.2.0) > > This is the watch fi

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Using GroupedSources for gulp

Le 19/05/2019 à 17:52, Pirate Praveen a écrit : > > > On Sun, May 19, 2019 at 9:08 PM, Xavier wrote: >> Le 19/05/2019 à 16:34, Pirate Praveen a écrit : >>>  Hi, >>> >>>  I have been using >>>  https://wiki.debian.org/Javascript/Nodejs/Npm2De

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#927254: Bug#927254: Bug#927254: libjs-vue-router: ships node module instead of browser one

Le 14/05/2019 à 11:41, Dmitry Bogatov a écrit : > > [2019-04-22 09:56] Dmitry Bogatov >>> Provided files are not node-* ones but recompiled using rollup. Could >>> you check if Laminar works well with >>> https://unpkg.com/vue-router@3.0.2/dist/vue-router.js file ? (same >>> version than in Buste

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Using GroupedSources for gulp

Le 19/05/2019 à 20:03, Pirate Praveen a écrit : > > > On Sun, May 19, 2019 at 9:24 PM, Xavier wrote: >> Then don't use "group", and add "ignore" on gulp-cli only. > > It creates only ../node-gulp_4.0.2.orig.tar.gz > > Is it not expected

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Using GroupedSources for gulp

Le 20/05/2019 à 18:53, Pirate Praveen a écrit : > In debian/watch no matching hrefs for version When "ignore" is missing, uscan search gulp-cli with exactly the same version than gulp ;-) -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debia

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Using GroupedSources for gulp

Le 20/05/2019 à 19:24, Pirate Praveen a écrit : > version=4 > > opts=\ > dversionmangle=s/\+(debian|dfsg|ds|deb)(\.\d+)?$//,\ > filenamemangle=s/.*\/v?([\d\.-]+)\.tar\.gz/node-gulp-$1.tar.gz/ \ > https://github.com/gulpjs/gulp/tags .*/archive/v?([\d\.]+).tar.gz group > > opts="searchmode=plain,pg

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Using GroupedSources for gulp

Le 20/05/2019 à 20:47, Utkarsh Gupta a écrit : > Hey, > > On 20/05/19 11:28 pm, Xavier wrote: >> Le 20/05/2019 à 19:24, Pirate Praveen a écrit : >>> version=4 >>> >>> opts=\ >>> dversionmangle=s/\+(debian|dfsg|ds|deb)(\.\d+)?$//,\ >>> fi

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Using GroupedSources for gulp

Le 20/05/2019 à 21:23, Xavier a écrit : > Le 20/05/2019 à 20:47, Utkarsh Gupta a écrit : >> Hey, >> >> On 20/05/19 11:28 pm, Xavier wrote: >>> Le 20/05/2019 à 19:24, Pirate Praveen a écrit : >>>> version=4 >>>> >>

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Using GroupedSources for gulp

Le 20/05/2019 à 21:25, Xavier a écrit : > Le 20/05/2019 à 21:23, Xavier a écrit : >> Le 20/05/2019 à 20:47, Utkarsh Gupta a écrit : >>> Hey, >>> >>> On 20/05/19 11:28 pm, Xavier wrote: >>>> Le 20/05/2019 à 19:24, Pirate Praveen a écrit : >>&

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] ?==?utf-8?q? Using GroupedSources for gulp

Le Mardi, Mai 21, 2019 15:30 CEST, Pirate Praveen a écrit: > > > On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 12:53 AM, Xavier wrote: > > Unable to reproduce, still works fine: > > > > $ head debian/changelog -n 2 > > node-gulp (4.0.2-1) unstable; urgency=medium > >

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#929448: node-regexpu-core build-depends on cruft package node-unicode-11.0.0

Le 23/05/2019 à 20:03, Peter Michael Green a écrit : > package: node-regexpu-core > version: 4.4.0+ds-1 > severity: serious > > node-regexpu-core build-depends on node-unicode-11.0.0 which is no > longer built by source package node-unicode-data. It appears to have > been replaced by node-unicode-

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#929447: acorn build-depends on cruft package node-unicode-11.0.0

Le 23/05/2019 à 19:57, Peter Michael Green a écrit : > package: node-regenerate-unicode-properties > version: 7.0.0+ds-1 > severity: serious > > node-regenerate-unicode-properties build-depends on node-unicode-11.0.0 > which is no longer built by source package node-unicode-data. It appears > to h

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Fwd: release.debian.org: [pre-approval] testing-proposed-updates for unicode changes

rollup salvage in progress... Message transféré Sujet : release.debian.org: [pre-approval] testing-proposed-updates for unicode changes Date : Thu, 23 May 2019 20:51:13 +0200 De : Xavier Guimard Pour : Debian Bug Tracking System Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#929654: Bug#929654: Outdated node-unicode-property-value-aliases results in incomplete package rebuild

Control: severity -1 important Le 28/05/2019 à 00:11, Daniel Drake a écrit : > Package: node-unicode-12.0.0 > Version: 0~20190414+gitbf518e99-2 > > node-unicode-data 0~20190414+gitbf518e99-2 was originally built > successfully and correctly under sid, and then the binaries were > imported to bust

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Fix for d3-scale-chtomatic ; request for the package to be uploaded

t; Nilesh Hello, autopkgtest didn't work, also you duplicated some autopkgtests. Here are my changes. Could you commit this directly in g...@salsa.debian.org:js-team/node-d3-scale-chromatic.git ? Cheers, Xavier diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control index 5946dc8..2044588 100644 -

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Fix for d3-scale-chtomatic ; request for the package to be uploaded

Le 30/05/2019 à 12:23, Nilesh Patra a écrit : > I have committed the changes in > https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-d3-scale-chromatic/tree/master/debian > , as asked . > It is my humble request to you for uploading this package. > Thanks > Regards > Nilesh Pushed, thanks -- Pkg-javascript-d

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] gulp 4 transition: help needed

Le 31/05/2019 à 17:19, Pirate Praveen a écrit : > Hi, > > I just uploaded gulp 4 to experimental. I had to embed about 50+ node > modules in it (plus many more in node-vinyl-fs). I have left one lintian > error about source missing since there is no easy way to exclude it (see > #929805). > > Ple

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#929829: Bug#929829: gulp 4 cannot build node-babel 7 - Cannot convert undefined or null to object

Le 01/06/2019 à 12:14, Pirate Praveen a écrit : > ... > gulp build > [15:37:17] Local modules not found in ~/forge/debian/git/js-team/node-babel > [15:37:17] Try running: npm install > [15:37:17] Using globally installed gulp > [15:37:17] Using gulpfile ~/forge/debian/git/js-team/node-babel/Gulpfil

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#929829: Bug#929829: Bug#929829: gulp 4 cannot build node-babel 7 - Cannot convert undefined or null to object

Le 03/06/2019 à 22:23, Xavier a écrit : > Le 01/06/2019 à 12:14, Pirate Praveen a écrit : >> ... >> gulp build >> [15:37:17] Local modules not found in ~/forge/debian/git/js-team/node-babel >> [15:37:17] Try running: npm install >> [15:37:17] Using globally i

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#929829: Bug#929829: Bug#929829: gulp 4 cannot build node-babel 7 - Cannot convert undefined or null to object

Le 03/06/2019 à 22:23, Xavier a écrit : > Le 01/06/2019 à 12:14, Pirate Praveen a écrit : >> ... >> gulp build >> [15:37:17] Local modules not found in ~/forge/debian/git/js-team/node-babel >> [15:37:17] Try running: npm install >> [15:37:17] Using globally i

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >