(+cc: nod...@packages.debian.org. Sorry for the noise.)
Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Patrick Ouellette wrote:
>> You claim to not use either package, but yet you advocate for the node.js
>> package to keep the executable name "node" - this is strange to me.
>
> Sorry, I must have been unclear.
A few
On Sun, Nov 06, 2011 at 09:20:31PM -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>
> Hi Pat,
>
> Patrick Ouellette wrote:
>
> > The binary on the ham radio side is not "LinuxNode" in package "node" it is
> > simply "node" in package "node"
> >
> > Since you are still concerned with this issue, and neither side
Hi Pat,
Patrick Ouellette wrote:
> The binary on the ham radio side is not "LinuxNode" in package "node" it is
> simply "node" in package "node"
>
> Since you are still concerned with this issue, and neither side has shown a
> willingness to change, I would say the time has come for both packages
On Sun, Nov 06, 2011 at 01:27:42AM -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> In February, I wrote[1]:
>
> > Both LinuxNode (package "node") and node.js (package "nodejs") are
> > designed to be accessed through the command name "node".
> [...]
> > If there is any way I can help, please feel free
We are giving internatioanl Loan to coporate companies and private individuals
at a low and affordable interest rate of 3% for 1 year to 30 years duration of
the repayment period, with loan amounts ranging from USD 5,000 to USD 5
million. For more details E-mail: kdf.ls...@xyan.us
Sent from m
On 06/11/2011 22:17, David Paleino wrote:
> On Sun, 6 Nov 2011 22:03:33 +0100, David Paleino wrote:
>
>> It seems like the package is asking for "wax", which is a
>> pure-javascript library, to be used from a web browser, even though it is
>> available from npmjs.org. I packaged (correctly, I hope
On Sun, 6 Nov 2011 22:03:33 +0100, David Paleino wrote:
> It seems like the package is asking for "wax", which is a
> pure-javascript library, to be used from a web browser, even though it is
> available from npmjs.org. I packaged (correctly, I hope) libjs-wax, but this
> code horribly fails in No
Accepted:
node-contextify_0.0.6-2.debian.tar.gz
to main/n/node-contextify/node-contextify_0.0.6-2.debian.tar.gz
node-contextify_0.0.6-2.dsc
to main/n/node-contextify/node-contextify_0.0.6-2.dsc
node-contextify_0.0.6-2_i386.deb
to main/n/node-contextify/node-contextify_0.0.6-2_i386.deb
Ov
Hello people,
I'm still struggling in packaging a NodeJS application I particularly like,
TileMill :)
It seems like the package is asking for "wax", which is a
pure-javascript library, to be used from a web browser, even though it is
available from npmjs.org. I packaged (correctly, I hope) libjs-w
node-contextify_0.0.6-2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
node-contextify_0.0.6-2.dsc
node-contextify_0.0.6-2.debian.tar.gz
node-contextify_0.0.6-2_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
_
10 matches
Mail list logo