(new) libv8-3.8.9.20_3.8.9.20-1_amd64.deb optional libs
v8 JavaScript engine - runtime library
V8 is a high performance JavaScript engine written in C++. It is used
in the web browser Chromium.
.
This package includes the dynamic library against which you can link
your program.
libv8-dbg_3.8.
libv8_3.8.9.20-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
libv8_3.8.9.20-1.dsc
libv8_3.8.9.20.orig.tar.gz
libv8_3.8.9.20-1.debian.tar.gz
libv8-dev_3.8.9.20-1_amd64.deb
libv8-3.8.9.20_3.8.9.20-1_amd64.deb
libv8-dbg_3.8.9.20-1_amd64.deb
Greetings,
Y
On Saturday, April 28, 2012 13:23:21, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Jonas Smedegaard writes:
> > I also am biased in one direction but shall not say which as I see no
> > benefit at this point in rehashing the discussion: Both packaging
> > "camps" have clearly demonstrated a lack of interest in letting t
On 12-04-28 at 02:14pm, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>
> > Excellent.
> >
> > ...but this issue has sprung up again at d-devel@ I suggest we hold
> > our horses with actually releasing the changes until we see what
> > comes of that renewed discussion.
>
> Well, independentl
Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Excellent.
>
> ...but this issue has sprung up again at d-devel@ I suggest we hold our
> horses with actually releasing the changes until we see what comes of
> that renewed discussion.
Well, independently of all the making everyone happy stuff, do you
think adding a n
On 12-04-28 at 12:21pm, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>
> > How about editing directly yourself?
>
> Ok, pushed.
Excellent.
...but this issue has sprung up again at d-devel@ I suggest we hold our
horses with actually releasing the changes until we see what comes of
that ren
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 650343 + pending
Bug #650343 [nodejs] nodejs: please provide "nodejs" command as a synonym for
node
Added tag(s) pending.
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
650343: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/
tags 650343 + pending
quit
Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> How about editing directly yourself?
Ok, pushed.
___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java
Jonas Smedegaard writes:
> I also am biased in one direction but shall not say which as I see no
> benefit at this point in rehashing the discussion: Both packaging
> "camps" have clearly demonstrated a lack of interest in letting the
> other use the name "node", which means we must both step
On 12-04-28 at 02:54pm, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> On 28/04/2012 14:46, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > Hi esp. Jérémy,
> >
> > I just noticed that the copyright and licensing of waf-light in
> > nodejs is insufficient:
> >
> > * Seems at least wafadmin/pproc.py is licensed as Python-CNRI, not
> > BS
On 12-04-28 at 10:45am, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>
> > I'm attaching a patch that adds some documentation.
>
> And another patch, to make that documentation easier to find.
How about editing directly yourself?
You should already have access: git.debian.org:/git/collab-mai
Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> I'm attaching a patch that adds some documentation.
And another patch, to make that documentation easier to find.
From: Jonathan Nieder
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2012 10:32:56 -0500
Subject: Install README.Debian in the nodejs package.
debian/README.Debian is being installed to
Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>You really think that is acceptable for the
> project?
Surely not: the new command has no manpage. :)
I'm attaching a patch that adds some documentation.
debian/README.Debian | 16 +++-
debian/changelog |3 ++-
debian/n
On 28/04/2012 15:06, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On 12-04-27 at 11:58pm, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>> Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>>
>>> On some machines /usr/sbin/node refers to some program that is not
>>> the node.js interpreter. Therefore it would be helpful to have a
>>> "nodejs" command that does ex
On 12-04-28 at 03:31am, Carl Fürstenberg wrote:
> There has been an log struggle between the nodejs package and the node
> package, which is still unresolved (bug #611698 for example) And I
> wonder now what the future should look like.
>
> To summarize the problem:
> * the nodejs upstream binar
On 12-04-27 at 11:58pm, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>
> > On some machines /usr/sbin/node refers to some program that is not
> > the node.js interpreter. Therefore it would be helpful to have a
> > "nodejs" command that does exactly the same thing as /usr/bin/node,
> > for
On 28/04/2012 14:46, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Hi esp. Jérémy,
>
> I just noticed that the copyright and licensing of waf-light in nodejs
> is insufficient:
>
> * Seems at least wafadmin/pproc.py is licensed as Python-CNRI, not
> BSD-3-clause~author as declared.
The paragraph for that fil
Hi esp. Jérémy,
I just noticed that the copyright and licensing of waf-light in nodejs
is insufficient:
* Seems at least wafadmin/pproc.py is licensed as Python-CNRI, not
BSD-3-clause~author as declared.
* Apparently the licensing is not documented in source code itself, so
how it is
18 matches
Mail list logo
