Hello Gentlemen,
I thought I'd chime in since the linux-hams@vger list was added to the
thread and give one Packet HAM's perspective. Specifically, if one
proposal is to rename the long existing /usr/sbin/node binary to
/usr/sbin/axnode, why couldn't the new guy node.js binary be renamed
Hi again,
Patrick Ouellette wrote:
I completely agree, but apparently Node.js' upstream has changed the name
once previously (apparently from a similar problem) and while acknowledging
the name is generic and a poor choice refuses to consider another change.
(According to what I can tell
On 03/05/12 19:51, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
. Which package should use the name node in the long term? What
can we do to ensure that happens eventually?
(My answer is that I hope that neither uses the name node in
the long term.)
Exactly. It's a stupidly common term, probably
Hi team,
I've come to the point where I'd like to apply for Debian
Maintainership (DM, not [yet] DD).
I've been working with Julien Valroff jul...@debian.org on my first
package nautilus-image-manipulator who has agreed to advocate my
application.
My contributions so far [0]:
- Maintainer of 3
Hello My Dear
My name is Miss Blessing i saw your profile today and became intrested in you,i
will also like to know you the more,and i want you to send an email to my email
address so i can give you my picture for you to know whom i am.
Here is my email address, (blessingaliy...@yahoo.com)
I
Me again..
AX.25 in Linux has been around for a long time so I can excuse it's
overly generic node name purely based upon it's age but..
The working title of Node.js was server for a few weeks, before
anyone was using it.
Wow.. that's horrible! Obviously we don't want stuff like that to
