Your message dated Sun, 17 Jun 2012 22:49:40 +0200
with message-id <20120617204940.ga27...@xanadu.blop.info>
and subject line not reproducible in a more recent rebuild, closing...
has caused the Debian Bug report #676033,
regarding node-stringprep: FTBFS: (.text+0x20): undefined reference to `main'
Your message dated Sun, 17 Jun 2012 22:49:40 +0200
with message-id <20120617204940.ga27...@xanadu.blop.info>
and subject line not reproducible in a more recent rebuild, closing...
has caused the Debian Bug report #676736,
regarding node-mapnik: FTBFS: parse.hpp:155:9: internal compiler error:
Segm
Hi Emilien,
On 12-06-17 at 04:29pm, Emilien Klein wrote:
> This is my declaration of intent to become a Debian Maintainer
> http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMaintainer>.
> I have read the Social Contract, Debian Free Software Guidelines and
> Debian Machine Usage Policy and agree with all of them.
> C
Hi team,
2012/6/17 Emilien Klein :
> This is my declaration of intent to become a Debian Maintainer
This is more of an FYI to you that I've now officially started my
application to become a DM, not a request for you to advocate for me,
as I know we haven't worked a lot together yet ;)
+Emilie
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
This is my declaration of intent to become a Debian Maintainer
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMaintainer>.
I have read the Social Contract, Debian Free Software Guidelines and
Debian Machine Usage Policy and agree with all of them.
Currently, I maintai
On 17/06/2012 12:52, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On 12-06-17 at 12:06pm, Jérémy Lal wrote:
>> according to [1] we have
>> "After Sunday the 20th of May, any new transitions are likely not to be
>> processed until after the release."
>>
>> So that transition is way too late, and the result is that lib
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 1:04 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
>> Whoa - would you mind reconsidering that?
>>
> Why? He's done the right thing...
"three packages (with no other packages depending on them) needing a simple
rebuild" actually sounds feasible in a very shortest time.
But it's not up to me
On 12-06-17 at 01:04pm, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 12:52:40 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>
> > On 12-06-17 at 12:06pm, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> > > according to [1] we have "After Sunday the 20th of May, any new
> > > transitions are likely not to be processed until after the
>
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 12:52:40 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On 12-06-17 at 12:06pm, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> > according to [1] we have
> > "After Sunday the 20th of May, any new transitions are likely not to be
> > processed until after the release."
> >
> > So that transition is way too late,
On 12-06-17 at 12:06pm, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> according to [1] we have
> "After Sunday the 20th of May, any new transitions are likely not to be
> processed until after the release."
>
> So that transition is way too late, and the result is that libv8 3.10.8
> should be uploaded to experimental inst
Hi,
according to [1] we have
"After Sunday the 20th of May, any new transitions are likely not to be
processed until after the release."
So that transition is way too late, and the result is that libv8 3.10.8
should be uploaded to experimental instead.
Closing this bug.
Regards,
Jérémy.
[1]
h
11 matches
Mail list logo
