[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-expat is marked for autoremoval from testing

2016-10-07 Thread Debian testing autoremoval watch
node-expat 2.3.12-1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2016-10-24 It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs: 837285: node-iconv: FTBFS: Tests failures -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/

[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-body-parser is marked for autoremoval from testing

2016-10-07 Thread Debian testing autoremoval watch
node-body-parser 1.8.1-1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2016-10-24 It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs: 837285: node-iconv: FTBFS: Tests failures -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mai

[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-raw-body is marked for autoremoval from testing

2016-10-07 Thread Debian testing autoremoval watch
node-raw-body 1.2.0-1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2016-10-24 It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs: 837285: node-iconv: FTBFS: Tests failures -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailma

[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-iconv is marked for autoremoval from testing

2016-10-07 Thread Debian testing autoremoval watch
node-iconv 2.1.11-1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2016-10-24 It is affected by these RC bugs: 837285: node-iconv: FTBFS: Tests failures -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javas

[Pkg-javascript-devel] ltx is marked for autoremoval from testing

2016-10-07 Thread Debian testing autoremoval watch
ltx 2.4.2-1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2016-10-24 It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs: 837285: node-iconv: FTBFS: Tests failures -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] jquery-goodies policy and grunt

2016-10-07 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Paul Gevers (2016-10-07 15:33:39) > First off, you voice my opinion, and fortunately you don't mention > anything new (to me). The reason why I asked is because what I observe > in packages maintained by this team (which is new to me). This team is very loose - which means some in the te

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] jquery-goodies policy and grunt

2016-10-07 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi Jonas, First off, you voice my opinion, and fortunately you don't mention anything new (to me). The reason why I asked is because what I observe in packages maintained by this team (which is new to me). On 07-10-16 15:21, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Quoting Paul Gevers (2016-10-07 14:09:43) >> A

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] jquery-goodies policy and grunt

2016-10-07 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Hi Paul, Quoting Paul Gevers (2016-10-07 14:09:43) > I am about to add some JavaScript binary packages to Debian, but I was > really wondering what the current ideas are with respect to source > packages. There are a lot of jquery plugins packaged in the > jquery-goodies package, but also sever

[Pkg-javascript-devel] jquery-goodies policy and grunt

2016-10-07 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi all, I am about to add some JavaScript binary packages to Debian, but I was really wondering what the current ideas are with respect to source packages. There are a lot of jquery plugins packaged in the jquery-goodies package, but also several (a lot?) of plugins are packaged separately. What i