On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 02:48:40PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> > * Some Javascript modules are very small, resulting in lots of small
> > packages
>
> I think we need to balance the small packages concern with number of
> times such small packages are used.
>
> node-has was rejected recently
Package: node-global-modules
Version: 1.0.0-1
Severity: important
Hello Debian Javascript Maintainers,
There is a circular dependency between node-global-modules and node-resolve-dir:
node-global-modules :Depends: node-resolve-dir (>= 1.0)
node-resolve-dir:Depends: node-global-module
Package: node-d
Version: 1.0.0-1
Severity: important
Hello Debian Javascript Maintainers,
There is a circular dependency between node-d, node-es5-ext,
node-es6-iterator and node-es6-symbol:
node-d:Depends: node-es5-ext (>= 0.10.9)
node-es5-ext :Depends: node-es6-iterator (>= 2),
Package: node-babel-core
Version: 6.25.0+dfsg-2
Severity: important
Hello Debian Javascript Maintainers,
There is a circular dependency between node-babel-core and node-babel-register:
node-babel-core :Depends: node-babel-register (>= 6.18.0)
node-babel-register :Depends: node-babel-
On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 04:20:47PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Bill Allombert wrote:
> > On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 02:12:22PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>
> >> Policy also states that different packages must not install commands
> >> with different fu
On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 02:12:22PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Hi policy editors,
>
> In the discussion at [1], Pat wrote to the DPL asking for some
> mediation in figuring out what should happen to the "node" command
> name. No one has offered that mediation (the ctte presumably could do
> i
