Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Node.js and it's future in debian

2012-05-03 Thread David Ranch
Me again.. AX.25 in Linux has been around for a long time so I can excuse it's overly generic "node" name purely based upon it's age but.. The working title of Node.js was "server" for a few weeks, before anyone was using it. Wow.. that's horrible! Obviously we don't want stuff like that

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Node.js and it's future in debian

2012-05-03 Thread David Ranch
Hello Gentlemen, I thought I'd chime in since the linux-hams@vger list was added to the thread and give one Packet HAM's perspective. Specifically, if one proposal is to rename the long existing /usr/sbin/node binary to /usr/sbin/axnode, why couldn't the "new guy" node.js binary be renamed

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Node.js and it's future in debian

2012-05-03 Thread David Ranch
Hello Gentlemen, I thought I'd chime in since the linux-hams@vger list was added to the thread and give one Packet HAM's perspective. Specifically, if one proposal is to rename the long existing /usr/sbin/node binary to /usr/sbin/axnode, why couldn't the "new guy" node.js binary be renamed