Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Node.js and it's future in debian

2012-05-04 Thread Patrick Ouellette
On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 02:31:29PM +0200, DL1SIG wrote: I think using the alternatives system [1] could be a solution. I guess that node.js and axnode is not often used on the same system. Therefore in most of the cases the alternatives auto select mechanism will do the right thing. While

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Node.js and it's future in debian

2012-05-02 Thread Patrick Ouellette
On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 01:34:47AM +0200, Jérémy Lal wrote: On 02/05/2012 00:16, Patrick Ouellette wrote: (shrinking cc list because I think I've said too much on -devel already) Hi Pat, Patrick Ouellette wrote: I was under the impression that neither package was going to move

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Node.js and it's future in debian

2012-05-02 Thread Patrick Ouellette
FWIW, the ham radio node package has been in Debian since 1999 according to packages.debian.org. On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 01:50:03AM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote: [...] It is perfectly reasonable to have a transition plan to a new name. Given the age of the two packages, I'm not

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Node.js and it's future in debian

2012-05-02 Thread Patrick Ouellette
On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 12:13:49PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote: Patrick Ouellette wrote: Likewise I can argue the number of people with installed ham radio systems is a good reason NOT to change the current situation. You can, yes. But how does that move things forward at all? I never

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Is anyone maintaining (the ham radio tool) node?

2011-11-16 Thread Patrick Ouellette
be less disruptive because it is, well - unstable. Pat -- Patrick Ouellette p...@flying-gecko.net ne4po (at) arrl (dot) net Amateur Radio: NE4PO What kind of change have you been in the world today? ___ Pkg-javascript-devel