On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 8:23 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor
wrote:
> sorry to be late to the discussion!
>
> I quite like the idea that we can make it easy for web site
> administrators who use debian (and fedora!) to avoid the evil CDNs for
> their standard javascript.
No problem, thanks for chiming in
Quoting Daniel Kahn Gillmor (2013-08-22 05:23:17)
> > It doesn't make any sense to me to hardcode a filesystem path into
> > applications written in dynamic languages that you'll never be able
> > to just open with Firefox anyway. There's a reason there's a
> > separate namespace for content se
sorry to be late to the discussion!
I quite like the idea that we can make it easy for web site
administrators who use debian (and fedora!) to avoid the evil CDNs for
their standard javascript.
On 08/15/2013 08:40 PM, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
> There's nothing wrong with it, I just think we shou
Quoting T.C. Hollingsworth (2013-08-16 02:40:12)
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > Quoting T.C. Hollingsworth (2013-08-15 22:23:27)
> >> On 08/15/2013 05:53 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> >>> My proposed /usr/share/javascript is equally ugly, slightly
> >>> longer, als
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Quoting T.C. Hollingsworth (2013-08-15 22:23:27)
>> On 08/15/2013 05:53 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>>> My proposed /usr/share/javascript is equally ugly, slightly longer,
>>> also less likely to clash, and additionally is usable offline.
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> I personally don't care much, but I believe Debian will only add a root
> directory (or symlink) if that gets included in FHS (File Herarchy
> Standard).
We are most certainly not adding a root directory for this; that would be
absurd! ;
Quoting T.C. Hollingsworth (2013-08-15 21:50:36)
> On 08/14/2013 09:40 AM, Ken Dreyer wrote:
> > We were thinking of implementing something like
> > "_sysassets/javascript", and I thought it might be nice to check
> > with you guys to see what the future holds for Debian in this area.
>
> So fir
On 08/15/2013 05:53 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:> Quoting Ken Dreyer
(2013-08-14 18:40:33)
>> Fedora packager here (don't shoot! :)
>
> Welcome!!
>
>
>> Fedora is currently planning some Javascript guidelines[0], and the
>> subject of Debian compatibility came up during the discussion.
>
> Cool th
On 08/14/2013 09:40 AM, Ken Dreyer wrote:
Hi all,
Fedora packager here (don't shoot! :)
Hi, I'm also from Fedora and leading the charge for our new JS/Web
Assets guidelines (in addition to maintaining nodejs).
Fedora is currently planning some Javascript guidelines[0], and the
subject of D
Quoting Ken Dreyer (2013-08-14 18:40:33)
> Fedora packager here (don't shoot! :)
Welcome!!
> Fedora is currently planning some Javascript guidelines[0], and the
> subject of Debian compatibility came up during the discussion.
Cool that you "reach across"!
> Specifically, we're trying to deci
Hi all,
Fedora packager here (don't shoot! :)
Fedora is currently planning some Javascript guidelines[0], and the
subject of Debian compatibility came up during the discussion.
Specifically, we're trying to decide how best to serve the Javascript
libraries out to the web.
I saw that the Debian "
11 matches
Mail list logo
