Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] jquery-goodies policy and grunt

2016-10-07 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Paul Gevers (2016-10-07 15:33:39) > First off, you voice my opinion, and fortunately you don't mention > anything new (to me). The reason why I asked is because what I observe > in packages maintained by this team (which is new to me). This team is very loose - which means some in the

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] jquery-goodies policy and grunt

2016-10-07 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi Jonas, First off, you voice my opinion, and fortunately you don't mention anything new (to me). The reason why I asked is because what I observe in packages maintained by this team (which is new to me). On 07-10-16 15:21, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Quoting Paul Gevers (2016-10-07 14:09:43) >>

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] jquery-goodies policy and grunt

2016-10-07 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Hi Paul, Quoting Paul Gevers (2016-10-07 14:09:43) > I am about to add some JavaScript binary packages to Debian, but I was > really wondering what the current ideas are with respect to source > packages. There are a lot of jquery plugins packaged in the > jquery-goodies package, but also

[Pkg-javascript-devel] jquery-goodies policy and grunt

2016-10-07 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi all, I am about to add some JavaScript binary packages to Debian, but I was really wondering what the current ideas are with respect to source packages. There are a lot of jquery plugins packaged in the jquery-goodies package, but also several (a lot?) of plugins are packaged separately. What