Re: Packaging PythonQt for Qt 5

2017-06-06 Thread Erik Lundin
Den 2017-05-27 kl. 22:38, skrev Dmitry Shachnev: Yes, the soname is something to consider for upstream. If we think upstream made an ABI break, we usually do not patch the soname, but instead rename the package, i.e. append a prefix (“a” or “v5”). The new upstream release 3.2 solves this. The p

Re: Packaging PythonQt for Qt 5

2017-06-06 Thread Sandro Knauß
Hey, > How can I submit my packaging changes for review? Are you using pull > requests somewhere? there is no "formal way" nor pull request. The normal workflow is to use mentors and personal repos and send the link around. * mentors.debian.org * https://wiki.debian.org/Alioth/Git#Forking_Git_r