Re: tasksel's task-kde-desktop seems to be outdated

2018-04-09 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Monday, April 09, 2018 06:46:39 PM Maximiliano Curia wrote: > Hi, > > It seems to be that time again when task-kde-desktop needs to be updated. > And I think that it would be better to send one single bug with all the > changes to that we want to do. > > Currently task-kde-desktop recommends:

Re: Mailing List Continuation

2018-01-22 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Monday, January 22, 2018 03:39:36 PM Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > On 21 January 2018 at 14:19, Boris Pek wrote: > > Hi team, > > > > Some news about the future of mailing lists on Alioth: > > https://wiki.debian.org/Alioth/MailingListContinuation#Announcement > > Which lists

Re: kwallet-kf5 on mips

2016-12-04 Thread Scott Kitterman
On December 4, 2016 10:44:44 AM EST, "Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer" wrote: >On domingo, 4 de diciembre de 2016 15:40:21 ART Sandro Knauß wrote: >> Hey, >> >> with current kwallet 5.28.0, kwallet fails to build on mips archs >> (mips, mips64el and mipsel) [0]. >> It complains about a mis

Re: Bug#827194: RM: qtquick1-opensource-src -- ROM; Deprecated, will not build anymore with current Qt 5

2016-06-13 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Monday, June 13, 2016 12:17:33 PM Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > Package: ftp.debian.org > Severity: normal > > Hi FTP masters! I would like to ask you to remove qtquick1-opensource-src > from both unstable and experimental. > > It will not longer build with the current version

Re: Debian, (Py)Qt5 and QtWebKit

2016-01-24 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Monday, January 25, 2016 08:12:02 AM Florian Bruhin wrote: > Hey, > > (Cc'ing Kovid/Detlev because I think they'll be impacted by this > as well as the upstreams of Eric/Calibre, Cc'ing Axel Beckert because > I'm working with him for the package mentioned later in this mail) OK, kept them in C

Re: Qt4's Webkit in Stretch

2016-01-22 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Friday, January 22, 2016 05:24:41 PM Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > On Friday 22 January 2016 17:16:26 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer > wrote: [snip] > > > Does anyone has a better idea? > > Not necesarily better, but an idea after all: > > (partialremove) check which pack

Re: New Base for symbols in Qt5.6

2015-12-28 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Monday, December 28, 2015 11:08:27 AM Adam Majer wrote: > On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 02:57:50PM +0300, Dmitry Shachnev wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 03:41:39PM -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > > >> In any case I think we should keep the logic in pkg-kde-tools package, > > >

Re: Building DigiKam 4.14 with libkgeomanip and other former "extras"

2015-12-22 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Tuesday, December 22, 2015 03:52:00 PM Dmitry Shachnev wrote: > Hi Scott, > > On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 07:08:06AM -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote: > > It's not a new package. It was just behind several releases and the > > question was to either update to the last Qt4 re

Re: Building DigiKam 4.14 with libkgeomanip and other former "extras"

2015-12-22 Thread Scott Kitterman
On December 22, 2015 6:31:11 AM EST, Dmitry Shachnev wrote: >Hi all, > >On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 11:38:41PM -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote: >> Digikam is notoriously difficult to package before final release due >to >> depending on unreleased library versions and/or emb

Re: Building DigiKam 4.14 with libkgeomanip and other former "extras"

2015-12-21 Thread Scott Kitterman
On December 21, 2015 10:18:29 PM EST, Adam Majer wrote: >On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 08:49:34PM -0600, Steve M. Robbins wrote: >> I am aware of 5.x betas. I hesitate to use them right now because of >the >> "beta" status. The announcement post itself [1] says "This version >is for >> testing pur

Re: AppStream, Discover and metadata

2015-11-23 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Monday, November 23, 2015 06:26:49 PM Rohan Garg wrote: > Hi > > > For Debian, I'd like to know what we need to do to get Qapt + Appstream > > working. > > Any particular reason why we shouldn't use packagekit + appstream? All the work I've done with Muon so far is with the QApt backend. Per

Re: AppStream, Discover and metadata

2015-11-23 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Monday, November 23, 2015 06:03:54 PM Matthias Klumpp wrote: > 2015-11-23 17:59 GMT+01:00 Aleix Pol : > > Hi Debian KDE, > > Most of the discussion also applies to Debian, I've been requested to > > ask you as well. > > > > Note that I created a branch called "qapt+appstream". Maybe somebody >

Getting rid of kde{base}-workspace-dev

2015-08-31 Thread Scott Kitterman
Since we no longer provide a KDE 4 workspace, pretty much any package that build-depends on workspace-dev is partly or fully non-functional. We ought to, in short order, get rid of it. Here's the affected packages: reverse-depends -b kdebase-workspace-dev Reverse-Build-Depends

Re: kdecoration2 mess - std::function makes the world fun

2015-08-21 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Thursday, August 20, 2015 10:50:39 PM Maximiliano Curia wrote: > ¡Hola Lisandro! > > El 2015-08-20 a las 14:25 -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer escribió: > >> After having spent quite some time today looking at the current > >> kdecoration2 mess (tracked at > >> https://bugs.kde.org/

Re: Removing Qt4 in Strech

2015-04-16 Thread Scott Kitterman
On April 16, 2015 7:21:44 PM EDT, "Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer" wrote: >On Thursday 16 April 2015 18:43:52 Scott Kitterman wrote: >[snip] >> If you look at what paultag started regarding python3 migration (see >dda), I >> think that's a good model for

Re: Removing Qt4 in Strech

2015-04-16 Thread Scott Kitterman
On April 16, 2015 6:29:17 PM EDT, "Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer" wrote: >On Thursday 16 April 2015 22:37:52 Andreas Cord-Landwehr wrote: >> On Thursday 16 April 2015 15:58:58 Scott Kitterman wrote: >[snip] >> Hi, the porting progress of KDE Applications

Re: Removing Qt4 in Strech

2015-04-16 Thread Scott Kitterman
On April 16, 2015 6:29:17 PM EDT, "Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer" wrote: >On Thursday 16 April 2015 22:37:52 Andreas Cord-Landwehr wrote: >> On Thursday 16 April 2015 15:58:58 Scott Kitterman wrote: >[snip] >> Hi, the porting progress of KDE Applications

Re: Removing Qt4 in Strech

2015-04-16 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Thursday, April 16, 2015 03:59:58 PM Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > Hi everyone! I have drafted a Qt4-removal announce in gobby, Teams→KDE→Qt4, > right at the top. > > As many of you might know there are different feelings about this removal. > On one hand we will not be having a

Re: kdeconnect naming

2015-03-02 Thread Scott Kitterman
1:32:00 PM Jonathan Riddell wrote: > Debian haven't made a decision as it hasn't been packaged yet. The > question for now is should we diverge from probable upstream naming. > > Jonathan > > On 2 March 2015 at 22:45, Scott Kitterman wrote: > > I do

Re: kdeconnect naming

2015-03-02 Thread Scott Kitterman
I don't see a reason to diverge from Debian here. Scott K On Monday, March 02, 2015 08:24:26 PM Jonathan Riddell wrote: > I'm packaging the Plasma 5 version of kdeconnect, I'd like to ask for a FFe > and any testers very welcome > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kdeconnect/+bug/1427349

Maintaining common Kubuntu/Debian packages in Debian

2014-07-15 Thread Scott Kitterman
2014-05-23 04:45:30.0 -0400 +++ lskat-4.13.2/debian/changelog 2014-07-08 10:34:24.0 -0400 @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +lskat (4:4.13.2-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium + + * New upstream release. + * Add control.in and new rules to generate correct Vcs-* on Debian and +Ubuntu + + -- Scott Kitterma

Re: Qt5 switching qreal from float to double on arm*

2013-11-02 Thread Scott Kitterman
"Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer" wrote: >Note: only for pkg-kde-talk. > >On Saturday 02 November 2013 15:29:05 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez >Meyer >wrote: >> Hi! Starting from Qt 5.2.0 (most probably from rc1 and definitely not >from >> beta1 currently in experimental) Qt5 will switch qre

Re: kstarsmerge

2013-05-07 Thread Scott Kitterman
The no GL on arm* changes aren't relevant to Debian. Scott K Jonathan Riddell wrote: > - don't install GL on armhf >libglu1-mesa-dev [!armhf], libnova-dev, libqt4-opengl-dev [!armhf] > > >Jonathan -- http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk

Re: cmake merge

2013-05-06 Thread Scott Kitterman
Jonathan Riddell wrote: > * Merge with Debian, remaining changes: >- Add ubuntu_qt_import_dir_variable.diff >define QT_IMPORTS_DIR even when that dir does not exist. >- Add multiarch-python-include-dirs.patch > * Fix FindPythonLibs to specify both include paths to Python.h & > pycon

Re: Question about low-fat-settings

2013-03-18 Thread Scott Kitterman
"l...@telefonica.net" wrote: >Hi, > >sorry to bother you again... I'm just looking for some information that >maybe you are able to give me. >I need to know what certain (sections?) of ubuntu-low-fat-settings do >very precisely, and I cannot find a way to get in touch with the >developers or s

Re: Qt Multiarch Transition

2011-10-01 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Sunday, October 02, 2011 01:09:59 AM Praveen A wrote: ... > Thanks! I found a solution in ubuntu package. It has a ... For Debian people working on the Qt Multiarch transition, the Ubunt package is definitely a good place to look, since Ubuntu has already done this transistion. I don't perso

polkit-kde-1 merge feedback from Kubuntu

2011-05-27 Thread Scott Kitterman
I've reviewed the Kubuntu diff with Debian for polkit-kde-1 and it consists of a single patch that looks like it would be useful in Debian as well (attached). The purpose (from debian/changelog) is: * Add kubuntu_01_fix_dialog_focus.diff to prevent the auth dialog from popping up in the b

Re: towards KDE 4.5? (mail to -release, filling the needed info)

2010-08-04 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Wednesday, August 04, 2010 05:31:22 am Tom Albers wrote: > On Wed, 4 Aug 2010 12:25:05 +0300, Modestas Vainius > > wrote: > >> Finally, it is kdepim. The "official" planning currently says they will > >> skip 4.5.0 and release with 4.5.1 and well, the changes will be big. > >> Should we keep 4

Re: /usr/share/doc/kde4 (Debian) vs. /usr/share/doc/kde (Kubuntu)

2010-05-23 Thread Scott Kitterman
"Sune Vuorela" wrote: >On Sunday 23 May 2010 14:07:28 Modestas Vainius wrote: > >> So obviously this difference does not make kubuntu people very happy >> because extra work is needed for merging packages from Debian. As far as I >> understand, they want Debian to switch. > >I thought they jus

Fwd: Re: Naming scheme for KDE Configuration Modules

2010-02-02 Thread Scott Kitterman
e obsolete. D would also work well with standalone modules outside the shell. On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote: > FYI. We should plan on following Debian in this, so now is the time to weigh in. > > Scott K > > Original Message > Su

Re: Packaging of new plasma-foo work spaces

2009-11-25 Thread Scott Kitterman
> Hello, > > On trečiadienis 25 Lapkritis 2009 18:25:28 Scott Kitterman wrote: >> Our thought is to not split Plasma Desktop out into a separate binary, >> but >> leave it in kdebase-workspace as something that should always be >> installed >> (somewhat as

Packaging of new plasma-foo work spaces

2009-11-25 Thread Scott Kitterman
If you look at kdebase-workspace/plasma in KDE trunk, it's somewhat different than in past releases: http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/KDE/kdebase/workspace/plasma/ We now have both Plasma Desktop and Plasma Netbook with at least Plasma Mobile and probably others coming in the future. We discussed t

Re: metapackage for lokalize

2009-07-12 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Sunday 12 July 2009 19:46:35 Sune Vuorela wrote: > On Thursday 09 July 2009 08:21:17 Nick Shaforostoff wrote: > > > And your first commit looks good. > > One thing though, please add a changelog entry. I currently added a dummy > entry for you ;) > > > should I somehow communicate my changes to

Re: meta-kde4 and meta-kde

2009-04-08 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Wed, 8 Apr 2009 23:49:07 +0200 Sune Vuorela wrote: >On Wednesday 08 April 2009 20:31:04 Rainer Kluge wrote: >> Ana Guerrero schrieb: >> > - kde-minimal (just rename current kde4-mininal) I am not sure kde-core >> > longer fits. >> > - kde-full (renamed from current kde4) I agree it is clearer t

Re: Uploads to Squeeze and the $KDEHOME dilemma (was: Uploads to lenny and the $KDEHOME dilemma)

2009-02-04 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Wed, 4 Feb 2009 08:05:10 +0100 Sune Vuorela wrote: >On Tuesday 03 February 2009 23:15:55 Scott Kitterman wrote: > >> In Kubuntu we just migrated people in .kde without the backup tool and I >> would describe it as mostly OK. >pppo I have two systems here that were up

Re: [DRAFT for discussion] KDE 4.2 upload to unstable

2009-02-03 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Wed, 4 Feb 2009 02:38:28 +0100 Ana Guerrero wrote: >- Reintroduce kde 3 apps standalone that we think it is work it (at least pino > wanted to package kregexpeditor). The less here, the better. > I repackaged kdvi for Kubuntu because of (I think it was) inverse search funtions that a class o

Re: Uploads to Squeeze and the $KDEHOME dilemma (was: Uploads to lenny and the $KDEHOME dilemma)

2009-02-03 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Tue, 3 Feb 2009 22:56:27 +0100 Armin Berres wrote: >I meant Squeeze and not Lenny for sure. > >On Tuesday 03 February 2009 22:53:42 Armin Berres wrote: >> Hi all! >> >> As you all know Lenny is near, which also means that our 4.2 packages will >> enter Unstable in the very near future. Until t

Re: Need to download KDE 4.1 iso

2009-01-24 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Sat, 24 Jan 2009 12:07:55 +0100 Sune Vuorela wrote: >Please take this off this list. > Will do (I hadn't got this far in my inbox when I wrote the last one, sorry). Scott K -- http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk

Re: Need to download KDE 4.1 iso

2009-01-24 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Sat, 24 Jan 2009 09:56:48 + Beojan Stanislaus wrote: >On Friday 23 January 2009 22:15:50 Scott Kitterman wrote: >> On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 20:10:00 + Beojan Stanislaus >> >> wrote: >> >Kubuntu, the KDE version of Ubuntu, offers KDE4.1 for Intrepid Ibex, b

Re: Need to download KDE 4.1 iso

2009-01-23 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 20:10:00 + Beojan Stanislaus wrote: >Kubuntu, the KDE version of Ubuntu, offers KDE4.1 for Intrepid Ibex, but provides a relatively poor implementation. Relative to what? Scott K -- http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk

Re: KDE version in Lenny: KDE 3.5.9 vs KDE 4.1

2008-06-05 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Thursday 05 June 2008 16:03, Ana Guerrero wrote: > Hi folks, > > We have been delaying taking a decision about this for too much time now, > the freeze is coming up [0], and we need to have it clear, for our users, > the release team and the rest of Debian. > > Basically we can ship either KDE 3