Hey,
> I'm not entirely sure what to do about the name of the library during
> this handoff -- it might drop the "kf5" prefix. If we don't drop the
> "kf5" prefix, i suppose we'll need an epoch number in the package
> version to make sure that upgrades happen. It's also possible that
> we'll nee
¡Hola Maximiliano!
On Fri 2016-10-07 09:45:25 -0400, Maximiliano Curia wrote:
> Yes, sorry for not replying sooner. We are not planning to upload a new
> version of gpgmepp (we are currently skipping 16.08 and upstream is
> apparently
> dropping gpgmepp for 16.12).
ok, cool. so then taking it
¡Hola Daniel!
El 2016-10-07 a las 15:26 +0200, Maximiliano Curia escribió:
On Fri 2016-10-07 04:33:36 -0400, Maximiliano Curia wrote:
Qt and KDE libs are built with -fPIC, which, afaik, is stronger and
incompatible with -fPIE, would it be an option to use -fPIC for
gpgme?
I've been reading a
Forwarding as requested.
- Forwarded message from Daniel Kahn Gillmor -
Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2016 08:54:53 -0400
From: Daniel Kahn Gillmor
To: Maximiliano Curia
Subject: Re: gpgme 1.7.0~ alpha or beta to debian experimental?
X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 6.40 )
[ offlist because your respo
