Re: Moving forward on fixing bug 721938

2015-04-23 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
Does [0] works without patching qt4? [0] https://github.com/davidedmundson/qtsystemtraypreloadhack -- http://xkcd.com/150/ Personas como ésta no se encuentran todos los días. Y cuando uno las encuentra, suelen no estar disponibles. Si encontrás una, no la pierdas. Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez

Re: Moving forward on fixing bug 721938

2015-04-23 Thread Rohan Garg
2015-04-23 15:28 GMT+02:00 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez perezme...@gmail.com: Does [0] works without patching qt4? I've been told it does work, so I guess it's between me forking the Qt4 packages and maintaining them by myself or using that hack. Ah well ... [0]

Re: Moving forward on fixing bug 721938

2015-04-23 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
On Thu, 23 Apr 2015 10:28:56 -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: Does [0] works without patching qt4? [0] https://github.com/davidedmundson/qtsystemtraypreloadhack That looks like a not-yet-written code. Also I don't see how we would be able to use it in Debian: it will need to

Re: Moving forward on fixing bug 721938

2015-04-22 Thread Sune Vuorela
On Wednesday 22 April 2015 14:51:32 Rohan Garg wrote: So far I haven't seen a good reason not to include the patch ( from what I've gathered talking to people on IRC ) It is the other way around. We don't need reasons why not to include things. We need reasons to include it, despite not being