El lunes, 11 de septiembre de 2017 10:35:54 -03 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez
Meyer
escribió:
> Hi everybody! I'm considering asking for the RoM removal of amarok
> from the archive. It has plenty of bugs, no active upstream (aka dead
> upstream) and no finished port to Qt5.
>
> With a package i
On dinsdag 12 september 2017 16:34:05 CEST Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
wrote:
> Just developers, at this point there is no use in asking users.
In that case, carry on :-)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
--
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailm
On 11 September 2017 at 20:03, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> On Monday, September 11, 2017 10:35:54 AM CEST Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez
> Meyer wrote:
>> With a package in this state I would normally just go ahead and ask
>> the removal, but I know lots of people love amarok...
>
> There's a good ch
On Monday, September 11, 2017 10:35:54 AM CEST Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez
Meyer wrote:
> With a package in this state I would normally just go ahead and ask
> the removal, but I know lots of people love amarok...
There's a good chance that only developers watch this list. If you (also) want
t
Hi everybody! I'm considering asking for the RoM removal of amarok
from the archive. It has plenty of bugs, no active upstream (aka dead
upstream) and no finished port to Qt5.
With a package in this state I would normally just go ahead and ask
the removal, but I know lots of people love amarok...
