Package: webext-lightbeam
Followup-For: Bug #904933
Control: severity -1 important
Control: tags -1 patch
It does have a major effect on the usability of a package by
preventing user from installing it in the first place (i.e., Raspberry
Pi with a limited free space on an SD card).
There is also
Carsten Schoenert writes:
> Instead of discussing the severity of the bug report it would be more
> helpful
It is much more helpful to read original message in full:
> Yes, it uses 4 OpenSans-*.ttf fonts. fonts-open-sans already provides
> these fonts and is about 2 Mbytes in size.
> I've subm
Carsten Schoenert writes:
> The issue in question isn't breaking any policy, raises security issues,
> makes the package not usable or is provoking any data loss, so a
> severity of critical, grave or serious isn't a correct tagging.
> Decreasing the severity to normal.
>
> [1] https://www.debian
Package: webext-lightbeam
Followup-For: Bug #904933
severity -1 grave
thanks
Axel Beckert writes:
> webext-lightbeam pulls in texlive-fonts-extra which has 1 GB of
> installed size. Is this hard dependency really _required_?
Yes, it uses 4 OpenSans-*.ttf fonts. fonts-open-sans already provides
Carsten Schoenert writes:
>> ... and I'm trying to make use of such flexibility. For smooth migration
>> I'd like to use current firefox-esr/stable and
>> xul-ext-ublock-origin/stable while moving to firefox/unstable with
>> webext-ublock-origin/unstable (whatever unstable might be at the
>> mome
Carsten Schoenert writes:
> If users install a separate additional FF package they are on
> their own, but the system is flexible enough to get this handled.
... and I'm trying to make use of such flexibility. For smooth migration
I'd like to use current firefox-esr/stable and
xul-ext-ublock-ori
Markus Koschany writes:
> This is correct because the old XUL format does no longer work with
> Firefox 62. It is not possible to install them both at the same time.
Yes, I know that FF62 and XUL extensions are not compatible.
My hope was if it is possible to have FF-ESR and FF-62 installed at
Package: webext-ublock-origin
Severity: normal
While using Firefox ESR with xul-ext-ublock-origin/stable in a default
profile, user should be able to run Firefox 62 with
webext-ublock-origin in a separate profile. But right now,
webext-ublock-origin
Breaks: xul-ext-ublock-origin
and it is im
