Package: morituri
Version: 0.1.0-1
Severity: minor
sample session:
~$ rip drive
Usage: rip drive [command]
Use --help to get a list of commands.
~$ rip drive --help
Usage:
rip [OPTION...] - GStreamer initialization
Help Options:
-h, --helpShow
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
severity 574280 wishlist
Bug #574280 [morituri] morituri: advertises --help on error messages, but that
option provides no fuerther information
Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'minor'
retitle 574280 morituri: --help option hint could be less
severity 574280 wishlist
retitle 574280 morituri: --help option hint could be less confusing
thanks
[sent again, properly cc'ed cont...@bugs.debian.org this time]
Hi Peter,
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 11:05:23AM +0100, Peter Wiersig wrote:
sample session:
~$ rip drive
Usage: rip drive [command]
severity 574280 wishlist
retitle 574280 morituri: --help option hint could be less confusing
Hi Peter,
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 11:05:23AM +0100, Peter Wiersig wrote:
sample session:
~$ rip drive
Usage: rip drive [command]
Use --help to get a list of commands.
~$ rip drive --help
Usage:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
#introduces a security hole allowing access to the accounts of users who use
the package
severity 524805 grave
Bug #524805 [mplayer] mplayer: CVE-2009-0385 integer signedness error
Severity set to 'grave' from 'important'
thanks
Stopping
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 21:42:58 (CET), Philipp Kern wrote:
It would be great if every team on track could send us a short mail to
debian-rele...@lists.debian.org
What is our status regarding squeeze?
AFAIUI ffmpeg is done, and I'm not aware of similar pending library
transitions, read: no
Am 17.03.2010 14:42, schrieb Reinhard Tartler:
What is our status regarding squeeze?
For the packages that I have my hands in, I'd recommend to upload
a52dec ASAP to get rid of two minor but annoying bugs (#566385 and
#570508). Also, I have prepared packages for the new upstream version
of
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 02:42:04PM +0100, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
Hi!
How is the state of affairs wrt jack? If we want jack2 for squeeze, we
should communicate this ASAP!
Let's put it this way: we know that jackd1 is stable, so it qualifies
for a release.
If we vote against jackd2, we're
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 14:48:30 (CET), Fabian Greffrath wrote:
Am 17.03.2010 14:42, schrieb Reinhard Tartler:
What is our status regarding squeeze?
For the packages that I have my hands in, I'd recommend to upload a52dec
ASAP to get rid of two minor but annoying bugs (#566385 and
#570508).
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 14:54:12 (CET), Adrian Knoth wrote:
From the amount of testing, I'd vote for jackd1, from a feature
perspective, I'd go for jackd2.
So whoever is concerned, please share your opinion. ;)
What are other distros doing? What are the plans for fedora, gentoo and
opensuse?
Am 17.03.2010 15:21, schrieb Reinhard Tartler:
I'll make a note to upload them soon.
Thanks.
Still, I don't think we should try to switch. E.g. I know that current
mplayer rc3 will not work with ffmpeg 0.6, and I have no idea what else
might break.
Alright, fine with me.
--
Dipl.-Phys.
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 10:54, Adrian Knoth a...@drcomp.erfurt.thur.de wrote:
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 02:42:04PM +0100, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
Hi!
How is the state of affairs wrt jack? If we want jack2 for squeeze, we
should communicate this ASAP!
Let's put it this way: we know that
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 03:23:11PM +0100, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
From the amount of testing, I'd vote for jackd1, from a feature
perspective, I'd go for jackd2.
So whoever is concerned, please share your opinion. ;)
What are other distros doing? What are the plans for fedora, gentoo and
Am 17.03.2010 16:15, schrieb Adrian Knoth:
I have absolutely no idea about their plans. ;)
So maybe we should also stick to jack1 for queeze, make jack2 the
default post-squeeze and kindly ask the backports team to provide
jack2 packages for squeeze afterwards.
--
Dipl.-Phys. Fabian
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 04:41:08PM +0100, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
Am 17.03.2010 16:15, schrieb Adrian Knoth:
I have absolutely no idea about their plans. ;)
So maybe we should also stick to jack1 for queeze, make jack2 the
default post-squeeze and kindly ask the backports team to provide
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 12:55, Adrian Knoth a...@drcomp.erfurt.thur.de wrote:
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 11:20:17AM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
So whoever is concerned, please share your opinion. ;)
I would think that at this stage of Linux audio, trying to do pro
audio with a stable release
FYI: The status of the idjc source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 0.8.1-3
Current version: 0.8.1-4
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 13:50, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote:
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 01:23:03PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
Also, if my understanding is correct, jack2 is ABI compatible with jack1,
so no library transition is needed.
That was my impression too. If so, why don't we
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 17:13:14 (CET), Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote:
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 04:41:08PM +0100, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
Am 17.03.2010 16:15, schrieb Adrian Knoth:
I have absolutely no idea about their plans. ;)
So maybe we should also stick to jack1 for queeze, make jack2 the
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 02:09:33PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 13:50, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote:
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 01:23:03PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
Also, if my understanding is correct, jack2 is ABI compatible with
jack1, so no library
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 02:09:33PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 13:50, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote:
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 01:23:03PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
Also, if my understanding is correct, jack2 is ABI compatible with jack1,
so no library
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 06:24:10PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 02:09:33PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 13:50, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote:
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 01:23:03PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
Also, if my understanding is
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 01:24:43PM -0400, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote:
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 02:09:33PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 13:50, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote:
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 01:23:03PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
Also, if my understanding
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 01:29:31PM -0400, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote:
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 06:24:10PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 02:09:33PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 13:50, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote:
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 14:46, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote:
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 01:29:31PM -0400, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote:
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 06:24:10PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 02:09:33PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010
Send Your details for the claims of your won prize awarded to you by the Lottery
Board, providing your full information
Names
Address
Country
Lottery Board
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
libquicktime_1.1.5-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
libquicktime_1.1.5-1.dsc
libquicktime_1.1.5.orig.tar.gz
libquicktime_1.1.5-1.diff.gz
libquicktime-doc_1.1.5-1_all.deb
libquicktime1_1.1.5-1_amd64.deb
libquicktime-dev_1.1.5-1_amd64.deb
a52dec_0.7.4-14_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
a52dec_0.7.4-14.dsc
a52dec_0.7.4-14.diff.gz
liba52-0.7.4_0.7.4-14_amd64.deb
liba52-0.7.4-dev_0.7.4-14_amd64.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ries.debian.org)
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 03:24:19PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 14:46, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote:
What I propose is to ship the new code as a separate source package
and a separate binary package. The binary package will conflict with
the similar binary
Accepted:
a52dec_0.7.4-14.diff.gz
to main/a/a52dec/a52dec_0.7.4-14.diff.gz
a52dec_0.7.4-14.dsc
to main/a/a52dec/a52dec_0.7.4-14.dsc
liba52-0.7.4-dev_0.7.4-14_amd64.deb
to main/a/a52dec/liba52-0.7.4-dev_0.7.4-14_amd64.deb
liba52-0.7.4_0.7.4-14_amd64.deb
to
Accepted:
libquicktime-dev_1.1.5-1_amd64.deb
to main/libq/libquicktime/libquicktime-dev_1.1.5-1_amd64.deb
libquicktime-doc_1.1.5-1_all.deb
to main/libq/libquicktime/libquicktime-doc_1.1.5-1_all.deb
libquicktime1_1.1.5-1_amd64.deb
to main/libq/libquicktime/libquicktime1_1.1.5-1_amd64.deb
Your message dated Wed, 17 Mar 2010 19:02:10 +
with message-id e1nryvo-0004c1...@ries.debian.org
and subject line Bug#566385: fixed in a52dec 0.7.4-14
has caused the Debian Bug report #566385,
regarding a52dec: Uploaders field not correctly written
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Wed, 17 Mar 2010 19:02:10 +
with message-id e1nryvo-0004c7...@ries.debian.org
and subject line Bug#570508: fixed in a52dec 0.7.4-14
has caused the Debian Bug report #570508,
regarding debian/watch for a52dec does not work
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 15:56, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote:
There is a problem, though. The library names collide, so one would
have to have libjack1-0 and libjack2-0. This would mean that the
shlibs files would have to provide alternative dependencies (like
ffmpeg is doing for the
Adrian Knoth wrote:
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 11:20:17AM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On the other hand, for casual use of jack, a more stable version would
be preferred over a more featureful one.
Unfortunately, this is only half of the story. For the occasional use of
jack, jackd2 is easier
35 matches
Mail list logo
