On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 09:32:47PM +0200, torbenh wrote:
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 09:13:34PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
I propose to stick to jackd1 as the default/only library for other
packages to rely on until the rerlease of Squeeze, and only offer
alternative daemons (and eventually
Package: ffado-mixer-qt4
Version: 2.0.0+svn1806-2
Severity: important
Tags: squeeze
m...@wm16:~$ ffado-mixer
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/bin/ffado-mixer, line 31, in module
from ffado.ffadowindow import *
ImportError: No module named ffado.ffadowindow
m...@wm16:~$ ll
Package: ffmpeg
Version: 4:0.5.1-3
Severity: normal
Tags: squeeze sid experimental lenny
There are multiple ways of using ffmpeg without X so it would be nice to either
have:
* a ffmpeg-nox package
* or a ffplay package (which seems to be the only util using X related
* libraries)
--
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
forwarded 578443
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailaid=2989865group_id=157415atid=803734
Bug #578443 [src:bristol] bristol: FTBFS on kfreebsd-*: error: token
i386|amd64 is not valid in preprocessor expressions
Set Bug
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
#libffado (2.0.0+svn1813-1) unstable; urgency=low
#
# * Include python site-packages for ffado-mixer (Closes: #578499)
#
limit source libffado
Limiting to bugs with field 'source' containing at least one of 'libffado'
Limit currently set to
Package: audacity
Version: 1.3.11-2
Severity: serious
When upgrading from audacity 1.3.11-2 to audacity 1.3.12-2 (package
audacity-data has the same version as audacity), I get the following
error message:
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/audacity-data_1.3.12-2_all.deb
(--unpack):
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 01:53:35PM +,
adiknoth-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote:
The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
commit 79e3bf02882e6d8733a6a6d1b9d65c1017194c10
Author: Adrian Knoth a...@drcomp.erfurt.thur.de
Date: Tue Apr 20 14:18:32 2010 +0200
Include
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 04:46:11PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Include python site-packages for ffado-mixer (Closes: #578499)
+debian/tmp/usr/lib/python*
support/xdg/ffado.org-ffadomixer.desktop usr/share/applications/
This looks wrong: Python modules should be packaged separately,
Accepted:
ffado-dbus-server_2.0.0+svn1813-1_i386.deb
to main/libf/libffado/ffado-dbus-server_2.0.0+svn1813-1_i386.deb
ffado-mixer-qt4_2.0.0+svn1813-1_i386.deb
to main/libf/libffado/ffado-mixer-qt4_2.0.0+svn1813-1_i386.deb
ffado-tools_2.0.0+svn1813-1_i386.deb
to
Your message dated Tue, 20 Apr 2010 15:37:51 +
with message-id e1o4fwj-0007pv...@ries.debian.org
and subject line Bug#578499: fixed in libffado 2.0.0+svn1813-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #578499,
regarding ffado-mixer-qt4: ffado python module is not setup during install
to be marked as
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 05:17:34PM +0200, Adrian Knoth wrote:
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 04:46:11PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Include python site-packages for ffado-mixer (Closes: #578499)
+debian/tmp/usr/lib/python*
support/xdg/ffado.org-ffadomixer.desktop usr/share/applications/
This
FYI: The status of the stk source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 4.4.2-3
Current version: 4.4.2-5
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
Hi there,
I am just trying upload new upstream version to pyliblo repository
http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-multimedia/pyliblo.git;a=summary
I notice that I have debian dir in master and upstream branch too ...
Can it be fixed?
regards
mira
___
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 13:33, Jaromír Mikeš mira.mi...@seznam.cz wrote:
Hi there,
I am just trying upload new upstream version to pyliblo repository
http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-multimedia/pyliblo.git;a=summary
I notice that I have debian dir in master and upstream branch too ...
Can it
Od: Felipe Sateler fsate...@gmail.com
I notice that I have debian dir in master and upstream branch too ...
Can it be fixed?
The package seems to have never been uploaded. Is this correct? I so,
we could just dump this repository and start with a fresh one.
Ok, going to do it
thank
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 06:07:02PM +0200, Adrian Knoth wrote:
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 05:50:08PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
We could probably call python-support in the rules file, if it's not
done automagically by cdbs. ;)
I certainly recommend to use one of thos Python install systems,
jokosher_0.11.5-2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
jokosher_0.11.5-2.dsc
jokosher_0.11.5-2.diff.gz
jokosher_0.11.5-2_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ries.debian.org)
___
Accepted:
jokosher_0.11.5-2.diff.gz
to main/j/jokosher/jokosher_0.11.5-2.diff.gz
jokosher_0.11.5-2.dsc
to main/j/jokosher/jokosher_0.11.5-2.dsc
jokosher_0.11.5-2_all.deb
to main/j/jokosher/jokosher_0.11.5-2_all.deb
Override entries for your package:
jokosher_0.11.5-2.dsc - source sound
bristol_0.60.0-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
bristol_0.60.0-1.dsc
bristol_0.60.0.orig.tar.gz
bristol_0.60.0-1.diff.gz
bristol_0.60.0-1_amd64.deb
bristol-data_0.60.0-1_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host
Accepted:
bristol-data_0.60.0-1_all.deb
to main/b/bristol/bristol-data_0.60.0-1_all.deb
bristol_0.60.0-1.diff.gz
to main/b/bristol/bristol_0.60.0-1.diff.gz
bristol_0.60.0-1.dsc
to main/b/bristol/bristol_0.60.0-1.dsc
bristol_0.60.0-1_amd64.deb
to main/b/bristol/bristol_0.60.0-1_amd64.deb
20 matches
Mail list logo
