Am 06.08.2010 17:17, schrieb Felipe Sateler:
Sorry, I forgot about this one. Building it now...
Nevermind, thanks for the upload!
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debia
Am 08.08.2010 00:34, schrieb Andres Mejia:
The audiocd kioslave uses the lame frontend.
Some links relevant to the issue.
http://osdir.com/ml/kde-commits/2010-02/msg05221.html
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=230026
WTF, they really use the lame frontend (and rely on specific compile
time o
Please someone upload FLAC asap (from the master branch). It kills two
bugs that I'd like to have fixed in Squeeze. The other changes are
rather cosmetic, so I believe it is still feasible to convince the
release team for its inclusion in Squeeze.
- Fabian
___
On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 11:50:16AM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> As seen on the documentation, there is already a DeMuDi blend. Maybe we
> can start from there? DeMuDi people were part one of the 2 teams that
> merged into this one (d-multime...@lists.debian.org).
Thanks for reminding me that the
This needs a rebuild.
--
Alessio Treglia
Debian & Ubuntu Developer | Homepage: http://www.alessiotreglia.com
0FEC 59A5 E18E E04F 6D40 593B 45D4 8C7C DCFC 3FD0
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian
Wrong bug number.
vocproc needs to rebuild against latest libpaq.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Alessio Treglia
Date: Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 2:16 PM
Subject:
To: 592...@bugs.debian.org
This needs a rebuild.
--
Alessio Treglia
Debian & Ubuntu Developer | Homepage: http://www.ale
On 09/08/10 04:57, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> Please someone upload FLAC asap (from the master branch). It kills two
> bugs that I'd like to have fixed in Squeeze. The other changes are
> rather cosmetic, so I believe it is still feasible to convince the
> release team for its inclusion in Squeeze.
flac_1.2.1-3_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
flac_1.2.1-3.dsc
flac_1.2.1-3.diff.gz
libflac-doc_1.2.1-3_all.deb
flac_1.2.1-3_amd64.deb
libflac8_1.2.1-3_amd64.deb
libflac-dev_1.2.1-3_amd64.deb
libflac++6_1.2.1-3_amd64.deb
libflac++-dev_1.2.1-3_am
[quoting myself in parts]
On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 12:01:10PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> That's perfectly fine. So I will move any imaging related stuff to some
> Debian Imaging area which I will keep on maintaining for my own purposes
This is just done and the imaging stuff is not any more
On 09/08/10 06:01, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 11:50:16AM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> As seen on the documentation, there is already a DeMuDi blend. Maybe we
>> can start from there? DeMuDi people were part one of the 2 teams that
>> merged into this one (d-multime...@lists.d
Accepted:
flac_1.2.1-3.diff.gz
to main/f/flac/flac_1.2.1-3.diff.gz
flac_1.2.1-3.dsc
to main/f/flac/flac_1.2.1-3.dsc
flac_1.2.1-3_amd64.deb
to main/f/flac/flac_1.2.1-3_amd64.deb
libflac++-dev_1.2.1-3_amd64.deb
to main/f/flac/libflac++-dev_1.2.1-3_amd64.deb
libflac++6_1.2.1-3_amd64.deb
t
Your message dated Mon, 09 Aug 2010 13:32:14 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#579025: fixed in flac 1.2.1-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #579025,
regarding libflac-dev: libFLAC.m4 may set empty -L flag
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt w
Dear Release Team,
the pkg-multimedia team has just uploaded a revised flac_1.2.1-3
package to unstable. This packages contains fixes for two bugs
(#579025 and #585518) which unfortunately required an autoreconf of
the build system. The autoreconf result is applied by means of a
patch, which
On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 09:26:38AM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> Probably. So, if there was no actual technical work involved, we'll just
> start from your definitions.
OK.
> > for each project. However I would recommend to keep all the tasks files
> > in one place just to enable easier genera
Hi,
On Mon, 2010-08-09 at 15:45 +0200, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> the pkg-multimedia team has just uploaded a revised flac_1.2.1-3
> package to unstable. This packages contains fixes for two bugs
> (#579025 and #585518) which unfortunately required an autoreconf of
> the build system. The autore
On Aug 8, 2010, at 1:29 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On 06/08/10 13:46, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Fri, 2010-08-06 at 11:11 -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On 05/08/10 23:51, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Thu, 2010-08-05 at 20:52 -0400, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Hi Hans-Cristoph,
On Thu,
FYI: The status of the ardour source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1:2.8.9-1
Current version: 1:2.8.11-1
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will rec
On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 12:14:58PM -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Aug 8, 2010, at 1:29 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On 06/08/10 13:46, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Yee haw! I'm going to work thru the final kinks in the upstream SVN
where I have been doing the development/packaging so
On Aug 9, 2010, at 2:41 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 12:14:58PM -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner
wrote:
On Aug 8, 2010, at 1:29 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On 06/08/10 13:46, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Yee haw! I'm going to work thru the final kinks in the upstream
Am 09.08.2010 18:06, schrieb Adam D. Barratt:
The log for #579025 also suggests that fixing it would require
rebuilding reverse dependencies; is that the case?
No, that's mistakable from the bug log. In order for the fix to have
effect on a package (which is going to be built without an instal
20 matches
Mail list logo
