On 2010-08-22 20:06, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>
> Indeed this looks weird. If you consider it sane to use this approach
> then I guess it won't matter much. But striving towards the ultimate,
> if this is a dirty hack then please elaborate on possible alternative
> approaches - even if tricky to
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 10:34 PM, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> Can you please explain this? On what basis do we want to build against
> jackd2 instead of jackd1?
>
> this indicates that dssi works also when built against jackd1.
>
> AFAIUI, we want to build all packages against jackd1, but have jackd
On 2010-08-22 20:06, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>
> We should simply suppress the sse flag on 32bit x86, in my opinion.
>
> Or if it really hurts, we should either a) offer to variants or b)
> convince upstream to implement support for both and detect at runtime if
> optimized code whould be used or
On 2010-08-23 09:25, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> On 2010-08-22 20:06, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>
> anyhow, i had a look at the debian policy, and it says (in chapter 10.2
> Libraries on todays http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-files.html):
> "If the package is architecture: any, then the
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 09:27:24 (CEST), Alessio Treglia wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 10:34 PM, Reinhard Tartler
> wrote:
>> Can you please explain this? On what basis do we want to build against
>> jackd2 instead of jackd1?
>>
>> this indicates that dssi works also when built against jackd1
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 09:38:42 (CEST), IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> On 2010-08-23 09:25, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
>> On 2010-08-22 20:06, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>>
>> anyhow, i had a look at the debian policy, and it says (in chapter 10.2
>> Libraries on todays http://www.debian.org/doc/debi
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 09:35:24 (CEST), IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> On 2010-08-22 20:06, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>>
>> We should simply suppress the sse flag on 32bit x86, in my opinion.
>>
>> Or if it really hurts, we should either a) offer to variants or b)
>> convince upstream to implement
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 9:54 AM, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> No, but I want to avoid that other maintainers pick up this as bad
> example espc. when they are unsure about the situation and don't know
> what to do. In the next upload, please properly document that this is an
> experiment for experime
On 2010-08-23 09:58, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> If they are indeed in non-standard paths such that the dynamic linker
> doesn't see it without setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH or similar, then you're
> right. But..
>
>> nevertheless, it complies with it...
>
> even on amd64? There are some architectures t
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 10:31:19AM +0200, Alessio Treglia wrote:
> Moveover, I would like to testbuild qtractor with jack-session feature
> enabled and I'd need to force the compilation against jackd2.
JFTR: jackd2 has no jack-session support, yet. Jack session is only
available in jackd1-svn atm
naspro-core_0.2.0-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
naspro-core_0.2.0-1.dsc
naspro-core_0.2.0.orig.tar.gz
naspro-core_0.2.0-1.debian.tar.gz
libnacore2_0.2.0-1_i386.deb
libnacore-dev_0.2.0-1_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (runnin
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 10:32:55 (CEST), IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> On 2010-08-23 09:58, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>
>> If they are indeed in non-standard paths such that the dynamic linker
>> doesn't see it without setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH or similar, then you're
>> right. But..
>>
>>> neverthele
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 01:18:47AM +0200, Alessio Treglia wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Reinhard Tartler
> wrote:
> > I particularily like
> > https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuStudio/Applications, which is
> > linked from the PackageList page!
> >
>
> We should write a simila
(new) libnacore-dev_0.2.0-1_all.deb optional libdevel
The NASPRO core library (development files)
A tiny convenience library containing useful code to implement LV2
dynamic manifest plugins and especially bridges from other APIs to
LV2.
.
This package includes the development tools.
(new) libn
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 11:14:06 (CEST), Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 01:18:47AM +0200, Alessio Treglia wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Reinhard Tartler
>> wrote:
>> > I particularily like
>> > https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuStudio/Applications, which is
>>
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Adrian Knoth
wrote:
> JFTR: jackd2 has no jack-session support, yet. Jack session is only
> available in jackd1-svn atm, but you probably already know. ;)
Oh man, what an idiot...
Of couse I have noticed that in some upstream's documents and also
read in one of
permafrost_0.2.0-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
permafrost_0.2.0-1.dsc
permafrost_0.2.0.orig.tar.gz
permafrost_0.2.0-1.debian.tar.gz
permafrost_0.2.0-1_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
__
(new) permafrost_0.2.0-1.debian.tar.gz optional sound
(new) permafrost_0.2.0-1.dsc optional sound
(new) permafrost_0.2.0-1_i386.deb optional sound
DSP language designed with physics-based modeling in mind
This package contains a compiler for such language which generates
C source code and RDF/Tur
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 12:01:30PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>
> Well, the most obvious pieces of information missing are a) what version
> of the package is included in lenny and squeeze, and b) link to the
> package documentation.
Do you mean the information is missing on the long list[1]
reassign 399292 mplayer,kwin
severity 399292 minor
tags 399292 upstream,help
thanks
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 03:04:08 (CEST), Alexander Dorokhine wrote:
> Sorry, there is a misunderstanding regarding what is working. Scaling works
> fine as long as it is done after the movie starts.
>
> If I start
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 399292 mplayer,kwin
Bug #399292 [mplayer] mplayer: MPlayer rc1 can't be properly scaled by WM on
start
Bug reassigned from package 'mplayer' to 'mplayer,kwin'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions mplayer/1.0~rc1-3.
> severity 39929
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 07:14:11PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> I can't install jack2 in my development box... Or is some other way to
> do this?
Yeah, that's a problem. I added libjack-dev | libjack-jackd2-dev to some
build-deps, but that's nothing more than a crude hack.
We somehow want some
On 23/08/10 11:34, Adrian Knoth wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 07:14:11PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>
>> I can't install jack2 in my development box... Or is some other way to
>> do this?
>
> Yeah, that's a problem. I added libjack-dev | libjack-jackd2-dev to some
> build-deps, but that's no
Package: mplayer
Version: 2:1.0~rc3+svn20100502-3
Severity: normal
Steps to reproduce:
1) wget
http://ftp.acc.umu.se/pub/debian-meetings/2009/debconf9/low/1050_Lightning_talk_Redirecting_require.ogv
2) mplayer -vo sdl 1050_Lightning_talk_Redirecting_require.ogv
3) look at the text around 00:16
4)
I can reproduce this on amd64:
1) vnc4server -depth 24 :1
2) xvnc4viewer -passwd .vnc/passwd localhost:1
3) DISPLAY=:1 mplayer -vo x11 -nosound
1050_Lightning_talk_Redirecting_require.ogv
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-
Package: ffmpeg
Version: 4:0.6-2
Severity: normal
/usr/share/doc/ffmpeg/html/libavfilter.html contains the example
ffmpeg -i in.avi -vfilters "crop=0:0:0:240" out.avi
but it seems to fail:
$ wget
http://ftp.acc.umu.se/pub/debian-meetings/2009/debconf9/low/1050_Lightning_talk_Redirecting_requir
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package dirac
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
# remote status report for #564976 (http://bugs.debian.org/564976)
# * http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 582274 - wontfix
Bug #582274 {Done: Reinhard Tartler } [ffmpeg] ffmpeg:
VP8/WebM
Removed tag(s) wontfix.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
582274: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?b
Package: mencoder
Version: 2:1.0~rc3++final.dfsg1-1
Severity: normal
Steps to reproduce:
1) wget
http://ftp.acc.umu.se/pub/debian-meetings/2009/debconf9/low/1050_Lightning_talk_Redirecting_require.ogv
2) mencoder 1050_Lightning_talk_Redirecting_require.ogv -oac lavc -lavcopts
acodec=libvorbis -o
--
Rémi Duraffort | ivoire
--- Begin Message ---
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Rémi Duraffort"
* Package name: multicat
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Christophe Massiot
* URL : http://www.videolan.org/projects/multicat.html
* License : GPL
Pro
Hi!
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 11:11 PM, wrote:
> The branch, pristine-tar has been created
>at 8310c858374a1a6643c1e22ade6ba88f1e61351f (commit)
>
> - Shortlog
> commit 8310c858374a1a6643c1e22ade6ba88f1e61351f
> Author: Rémi Dur
On Aug 22, 2010, at 2:20 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 08:18:24PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On 21/08/10 18:00, eighthave-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote:
The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
commit b50fc79d8a856062d9a05100dd83a7fca3bf696b
Aut
On Aug 21, 2010, at 8:07 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
(Please don't CC me)
On 21/08/10 18:02, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Sat, 2010-08-21 at 15:45 -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On 21/08/10 15:10, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Ok, so we got pd-motex uploaded, and I've been applying all the
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 00:22:50 (CEST), Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> On Aug 22, 2010, at 2:20 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 08:18:24PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>>> On 21/08/10 18:00, eighthave-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote:
The following commit has bee
34 matches
Mail list logo
