OK, it seems only debian-multimedia has the problem. I'll tell
maril...@debian.org to please see
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=595691 .
P.S., the way the progress messages appear, one cannot tell which server
we are working with, but instead the last transaction completed etc.
Your message dated Mon, 06 Sep 2010 14:16:26 +0200
with message-id 8739tnvzhh@faui44a.informatik.uni-erlangen.de
and subject line Sparc binaries have arrived in the archive
has caused the Debian Bug report #591802,
regarding FTBFS on sparc: [po/fr/LC_MESSAGES/csound5.mo] Error -11
to be marked
Hi,
There is a new upstream version with manpage now. I tried to merge it, but I
do get patches related messages when running git-buildpackage.
The short howto on the multimedia wiki says
resolve merge conflicts, review your changes e.g. with gitk
How to check if there are conflicts and how to
Maintainer: Debian multimedia packages maintainers
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
Uploader: Konstantinos Margaritis konstanti...@margaritis.eu
Host: debian-ports.org
Accepted: ffmpeg_0.5.2-4+armhf_armhf.changes
Files:
ffmpeg_0.5.2-4+armhf.dsc
ffmpeg_0.5.2-4+armhf.diff.gz
Dear Debian multimedia package maintainers,
I'm one of the developers of the project called linux-minidisc [1]. The goal
of your project is
to bring full and free software support for all NetMD and HiMD MiniDisc
recorders and players.
Both NetMD and HiMD offer technologies to connect a MiniDisc
On Sep 6, 2010, at 4:02 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
On 2010-09-02 11:20, Roman Haefeli wrote:
I really don't get the logic of _adding_ a license at all.
this is only because of some attempts to uniform the build process for
pd-externals (nothing to do with debian), which makes some
On 2010-09-06 17:49, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Every tarball should have a file in it that contains the license.
Having that be a standard name like LICENSE.txt makes it really easy to
find for people who are doing things like packaging Pd libraries for
Debian. Also, the LICENSE.txt is
On Di, Sep 07, 2010 at 01:42:05 (CEST), Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Package 'libxul' requires 'nspr = 4.8.6' but version of NSPR is 4.8.4
Package 'libxul' requires 'nspr = 4.8.6' but version of NSPR is 4.8.4
checking npfunctions.h usability... no
checking npfunctions.h presence... no
checking for
