Package: rosegarden
Version: 1:10.04.2-1+b1
Severity: wishlist
new upstream release with a lot of bugfixes
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.33.7-rt29-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU
Package: qtractor
Version: 0.4.6-2
Severity: wishlist
qtractor new upstream 0.4.7
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.33.7-rt29-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores; PREEMPT)
Locale:
Package: qtractor
Version: 0.4.6-2
Severity: wishlist
new upstream 0.4.7
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.33.7-rt29-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores; PREEMPT)
Locale:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
merge 602370 602371
Bug#602370: qtractor: new upstream release
Bug#602371: qtractor: new upstream
Merged 602370 602371.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
602371:
Your message dated Thu, 4 Nov 2010 11:35:21 +0100
with message-id aanlktimd4tcvyb_eo_p5tos4bsgydqzlb+gc7xul6...@mail.gmail.com
and subject line Re: Bug#602370: qtractor: new upstream release
has caused the Debian Bug report #602370,
regarding qtractor: new upstream release
to be marked as done.
Your message dated Thu, 4 Nov 2010 11:35:21 +0100
with message-id aanlktimd4tcvyb_eo_p5tos4bsgydqzlb+gc7xul6...@mail.gmail.com
and subject line Re: Bug#602370: qtractor: new upstream release
has caused the Debian Bug report #602370,
regarding qtractor: new upstream
to be marked as done.
This
Accepted:
midistream_0.6.3-1_all.deb
to main/s/scenic/midistream_0.6.3-1_all.deb
scenic-doc_0.6.3-1_all.deb
to main/s/scenic/scenic-doc_0.6.3-1_all.deb
scenic-utils_0.6.3-1_amd64.deb
to main/s/scenic/scenic-utils_0.6.3-1_amd64.deb
scenic_0.6.3-1.debian.tar.gz
to
Hi maintainer!
I'm going to accept your package, but please rewrite your package
description. The only thing I understood from it, is that it does
soemthing with music (and even that is atually more a guess).
Best regards,
Alexander
___
On 11/04/2010 11:53 AM, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
Hi maintainer!
I'm going to accept your package, but please rewrite your package
description. The only thing I understood from it, is that it does
soemthing with music (and even that is atually more a guess).
Hi,
I think I used
On 2010/10/28 15:46, Adrian Knoth a...@drcomp.erfurt.thur.de wrote:
Can you confirm that test.c doesn't trigger the bug when ffado is
compiled without DEBUG?
Confirmed. The package 2.0.1+svn1856-6 hides the symptoms of the bug.
(The bug is of course still present, and needs to be fixed)
Max
Accepted:
pd-bassemu_0.3-1.debian.tar.gz
to main/p/pd-bassemu/pd-bassemu_0.3-1.debian.tar.gz
pd-bassemu_0.3-1.dsc
to main/p/pd-bassemu/pd-bassemu_0.3-1.dsc
pd-bassemu_0.3-1_amd64.deb
to main/p/pd-bassemu/pd-bassemu_0.3-1_amd64.deb
pd-bassemu_0.3.orig.tar.gz
to
Accepted:
pd-pmpd_0.9-1.debian.tar.gz
to main/p/pd-pmpd/pd-pmpd_0.9-1.debian.tar.gz
pd-pmpd_0.9-1.dsc
to main/p/pd-pmpd/pd-pmpd_0.9-1.dsc
pd-pmpd_0.9-1_amd64.deb
to main/p/pd-pmpd/pd-pmpd_0.9-1_amd64.deb
pd-pmpd_0.9.orig.tar.gz
to main/p/pd-pmpd/pd-pmpd_0.9.orig.tar.gz
Override
Hi,
quoting from your debian/copyright:
License: This code is too trivial to have a licence or copyright.
Is it really necessary to distribute it in a standalone source package?
Cheers,
Luca
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
Accepted:
pd-beatpipe_0.1-1.debian.tar.gz
to main/p/pd-beatpipe/pd-beatpipe_0.1-1.debian.tar.gz
pd-beatpipe_0.1-1.dsc
to main/p/pd-beatpipe/pd-beatpipe_0.1-1.dsc
pd-beatpipe_0.1-1_amd64.deb
to main/p/pd-beatpipe/pd-beatpipe_0.1-1_amd64.deb
pd-beatpipe_0.1.orig.tar.gz
to
Accepted:
pd-comport_0.1-1.debian.tar.gz
to main/p/pd-comport/pd-comport_0.1-1.debian.tar.gz
pd-comport_0.1-1.dsc
to main/p/pd-comport/pd-comport_0.1-1.dsc
pd-comport_0.1-1_amd64.deb
to main/p/pd-comport/pd-comport_0.1-1_amd64.deb
pd-comport_0.1.orig.tar.gz
to
On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 13:03 +, Luca Falavigna wrote:
Hi,
quoting from your debian/copyright:
License: This code is too trivial to have a licence or copyright.
Is it really necessary to distribute it in a standalone source package?
Yeah, I also think that this is questionable. I'm
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 02:44, Reinhard Tartler siret...@tauware.de wrote:
On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 16:17:34 (CET), Felipe Sateler wrote:
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 11:36, Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu wrote:
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 08:34:38PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
Since we need to
qsampler_0.2.2-3_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
qsampler_0.2.2-3.dsc
qsampler_0.2.2-3.debian.tar.gz
qsampler_0.2.2-3_amd64.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
To me LASH is dead. Jacksession and Ladish are alive...
\r
On 11/04/2010 03:51 PM, ales...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote:
The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
commit 919c7251ce5675267766671cd0e9cc052793d3a4
Author: Alessio Tregliaales...@debian.org
Date: Thu Nov 4
Accepted:
qsampler_0.2.2-3.debian.tar.gz
to main/q/qsampler/qsampler_0.2.2-3.debian.tar.gz
qsampler_0.2.2-3.dsc
to main/q/qsampler/qsampler_0.2.2-3.dsc
qsampler_0.2.2-3_amd64.deb
to main/q/qsampler/qsampler_0.2.2-3_amd64.deb
Override entries for your package:
qsampler_0.2.2-3.dsc -
On Thu, Nov 04, 2010 at 02:51:32PM +, ales...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote:
Add lashd to the Suggests field. control will be auto-regenerated, drop
delta.
diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
index a43976e..a97f98c 100644
--- a/debian/control
+++ b/debian/control
@@ -22,8 +22,7
On Nov 4, 2010, at 9:34 AM, Roman Haefeli wrote:
On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 13:03 +, Luca Falavigna wrote:
Hi,
quoting from your debian/copyright:
License: This code is too trivial to have a licence or copyright.
Is it really necessary to distribute it in a standalone source
package?
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 5:49 PM, rosea.grammostola
rosea.grammost...@gmail.com wrote:
Please commit independent changes separately!
You apparently mised mention dropping recommendation on a2jmidid.
No, I tried to put them in-sync.
Next commits will be single change-related.
And I'm wondering
rtkit_0.9-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
rtkit_0.9-1.dsc
rtkit_0.9.orig.tar.gz
rtkit_0.9-1.debian.tar.gz
rtkit_0.9-1_amd64.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 17:15, Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at wrote:
On Nov 4, 2010, at 9:34 AM, Roman Haefeli wrote:
On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 13:03 +, Luca Falavigna wrote:
Hi,
quoting from your debian/copyright:
License: This code is too trivial to have a licence or copyright.
On Thu, Nov 04, 2010 at 10:45:32PM +0100, Alessio Treglia wrote:
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 5:49 PM, rosea.grammostola
rosea.grammost...@gmail.com wrote:
Please commit independent changes separately!
You apparently mised mention dropping recommendation on a2jmidid.
No, I tried to put them
On 2010-11-04 22:51, Felipe Sateler wrote:
Yeah, it is annoying for sure. The problem is that this particular object
is widely used and has been distributed and used like this since 2003ish.
Can't it be distributed within puredata itself?
hmm, i'd rather have the puredata package follow
Package: pd-pmpd
Version: 0.9-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
pd-pmpd fires up unoconv to convert its manual from Star Office's
native format to PDF, but unoconv evidently needs a writable $HOME for
whatever reason:
| unoconv -f pdf
On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 12:10:56AM +0100, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
i'd probably go for a pd-plugins-misc (name to be discussed) package
that distributes a number of _trivial_ 3rd party objects (trivial
meaning, that they don't justify separate packaging)
pd-plugins-common perhaps?
-
Hello team,
Now that libdrumstick has been accepted into unstable, could somebody please
look into sponsoring kmetronome? It should be ready to go in our git.
Kind regards,
Arnout
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 20:10, IOhannes m zmoelnig zmoel...@iem.at wrote:
On 2010-11-04 22:51, Felipe Sateler wrote:
Yeah, it is annoying for sure. The problem is that this particular object
is widely used and has been distributed and used like this since 2003ish.
Can't it be distributed
On Fri, 2010-11-05 at 00:10 +0100, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
On 2010-11-04 22:51, Felipe Sateler wrote:
Yeah, it is annoying for sure. The problem is that this particular object
is widely used and has been distributed and used like this since 2003ish.
Can't it be distributed within
32 matches
Mail list logo
