Hi all,
right few minutes ago, Matteo F. Vescovi joined the Debian Multimedia
Maintainers team on Alioth, willing to work on the packaging of
libmp4v2: please, give him a warm welcome!
Matteo, have you already checked our policies [1]?
There are some other packages you intend to bring under DMM
Hi Alessio, hi DMM team!
On 06/08/2011 10:41, Alessio Treglia wrote:
Hi all,
right few minutes ago, Matteo F. Vescovi joined the Debian Multimedia
Maintainers team on Alioth, willing to work on the packaging of
libmp4v2: please, give him a warm welcome!
Thanks a lot for your trust and
On 06/08/2011 11:32, Alessio Treglia wrote:
FYI, you find the git repository at:
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-multimedia/mp4v2.git
Yes, I knew... I'll clone it later this afternoon and give it a good
look at it. Anyhow, thanks for the advice ;-)
Take care.
--
Ing. Matteo
Package: audacious-plugins
Version: 2.4.4-1
Severity: important
I did a rebuild of audacious-plugins, and since I had libnotify-dev
installed that got me the notify plugin built (and a dependency on
libnotify).
Please either build-depend on libnotify-dev or build with --disable-notify,
and check
On Thu, 4 Aug 2011 14:23:20 +0200
Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote:
Closing *again* as a non-bug.
I follow, but here's my 2 cents from userland...
If a 'python2.3' package existed in the current Debian distros, then
this bug could be moved to that package. No 'python2.3' package
currently
FYI: The status of the liblivemedia source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 2011.07.08-1
Current version: 2011.07.21-1
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day
FYI: The status of the lives source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1.4.4-1
Current version: 1.4.5-1
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
FYI: The status of the pd-pmpd source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 0.9-3
Current version: 0.9-4
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
FYI: The status of the qtractor source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 0.4.9-1
Current version: 0.5.0-2
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will
On Sa, Aug 06, 2011 at 14:41:58 (CEST), Eugen Dedu wrote:
Hi,
First, a minor incoherence: on
http://packages.qa.debian.org/liba/libav.html the maintainer field is
Debian multimedia packages maintainers, while on
http://packages.qa.debian.org/x/x264.html it is Debian Multimedia
Maintainers,
On 06/08/11 19:43, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Sa, Aug 06, 2011 at 14:41:58 (CEST), Eugen Dedu wrote:
Hi,
First, a minor incoherence: on
http://packages.qa.debian.org/liba/libav.html the maintainer field is
Debian multimedia packages maintainers, while on
On Sa, Aug 06, 2011 at 20:34:59 (CEST), Eugen Dedu wrote:
[...]
I can reaffirm that Debian distributes both libav as well as x264 under
the GPLv2, which is perfectly compliant with the DFSG. As for your
question regarding patents, please a look at the Debian Patent FAQ:
Hallo liebe
Komplimente des Tages!
Ich habe Ihre Kontaktdaten auf meiner privaten Suche nach einem
zuverlässigen und vertrauenswürdigen Person, ich weiß, dass diese E-Mail
werden Sie in eine gute Gesundheit zu treffen und auch surprisely aber Gott
hat seinen eigenen Weg, um Menschen
Package: ardour
Version: 1:2.8.11-6
Severity: important
Tags: patch
Justification: fails to build from source
Hello!
As can be seen from the buildd logs, Ardour fails to build on non-Linux
ports:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=ardoursuite=sid
I have attached a patch which
One important upstream detail is that the lib is called 'osc', the
folder in SVN is called 'osc', the package is called 'pd-osc',
therefore the OSC-meta.pd needs to be osc-meta.pd to match the library
and package name. That change is already in the upstream SVN.
Also, it'd be good to
15 matches
Mail list logo