Bug#678347: libffado: FTBFS on powerpc

2012-06-20 Thread Touko Korpela
Package: libffado Version: 2.0.99+svn2163-2 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) Please look at https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=libffado 2.0.99+svn2163 fails to build on powerpc __

Bug#665974: Diff between the two libmpc_0.1~r459-X.debian.tar.gz files

2012-06-20 Thread Han Boetes
Your patch seems to fix the issue. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/External_variable#Definition.2C_declaration_and_the_extern_keyword # Han ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.a

Processed: Re: Bug#665974: Diff between the two libmpc_0.1~r459-X.debian.tar.gz files

2012-06-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 665974 patch upstream Bug #665974 [libmpcdec6] moc: does not play .mpc files with 'Error in the stream!' message Bug #665753 [libmpcdec6] libmpcdec6: musepack files cannot be played with libmpcdec6 from testing/unstable Bug #678113 [libmpcd

Bug#665974: Diff between the two libmpc_0.1~r459-X.debian.tar.gz files

2012-06-20 Thread Fabian Greffrath
tags 665974 patch upstream thanks Am Mittwoch, den 20.06.2012, 16:47 +0200 schrieb Fabian Greffrath: > 1) Could you check if it works with the latest SVN snapshot of libmpc: > svn co http://svn.musepack.net/libmpc > > 2) Could you provide an example sound file somewhere? I do not have > one myse

Bug#658040: Please enable hardened build flags

2012-06-20 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 11:10:27PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > Package: mplayer > Version: 2:1.0~rc4.dfsg1+svn34540-1 > Severity: important > Tags: patch > > Please enable hardened build flags through dpkg-buildflags. > > Patch attached. The more stringent format string checks > unveiled a

Bug#678315: smplayer: video freeze when window is bigger then some variable size

2012-06-20 Thread Ilya A. Potapov
Package: smplayer Version: 0.8.0-1 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, I have 1920x1080 screen. When i switch video to fullscreen, picture freezes, but sound is played. Resizing smplayer window greater then some size causing the same behaviour. 'Critical' size is constant for each video file,

Bug#666674: marked as done (Float Point Exception when playing some MP3 files)

2012-06-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 20 Jun 2012 17:43:44 +0200 with message-id <4fe1efb0.5090...@igalia.com> and subject line Fixed on 3.2.3 has caused the Debian Bug report #74, regarding Float Point Exception when playing some MP3 files to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem ha

Processed: Forwarding bug to upstream

2012-06-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > Forwarded 74 http://redmine.audacious-media-player.org/issues/132 Bug #74 [audacious] Float Point Exception when playing some MP3 files Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'http://redmine.audacious-media-player.org/issues/132'. > End of messa

Bug#666674: Forwarding bug to upstream

2012-06-20 Thread Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez
Forwarded 74 http://redmine.audacious-media-player.org/issues/132 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi

Bug#665974: Diff between the two libmpc_0.1~r459-X.debian.tar.gz files

2012-06-20 Thread Fabian Greffrath
Am 20.06.2012 11:07, schrieb Han Boetes: With "CFLAGS=-g -O2 -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -Wformat -Werror=format-security" it fails and with "CFLAGS=-g -O2" it works fine indeed. 1) Could you check if it works with the latest SVN snapshot of libmpc: svn co http://svn.musepack.ne

Re: Is libav feature-complete?

2012-06-20 Thread Reinhard Tartler
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Fabian Greffrath wrote: > Hi team, > > just unteil yesterday, when Irebuilt libav several times to check the > cond_enable() macros, I believed the libav packages we ship were > feature-complete - at least in its -extra flavour. However, there are still > a handfu

Re: Is libav feature-complete?

2012-06-20 Thread Fabian Greffrath
Am 20.06.2012 10:54, schrieb Fabian Greffrath: Sun medialib support no libnut enabledno Those two have been removed upstream meanwhile... ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org

Bug#678151: also works without SYSLIBS

2012-06-20 Thread bart
I had to build again, and tried without any scons arguments. Seems I was wrong about needing SYSLIBS=1. I now seem to have a fully working default compile of "ardour 2.8.13 (built from revision 12772). ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-

Bug#666446: marked as done (earcandy doesn't display GUI)

2012-06-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 20 Jun 2012 11:01:27 + with message-id and subject line Bug#677823: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #666446, regarding earcandy doesn't display GUI to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. I

Bug#649875: marked as done (earcandy forces the "max" volume setting)

2012-06-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 20 Jun 2012 11:01:27 + with message-id and subject line Bug#677823: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #649875, regarding earcandy forces the "max" volume setting to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been d

Bug#677823: Removed package(s) from unstable

2012-06-20 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Version: 0.9+bzr12-2+rm Dear submitter, as the package earcandy has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/677823 T

Bug#677823: Removed package(s) from unstable

2012-06-20 Thread Debian FTP Masters
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: earcandy | 0.9+bzr12-2 | source, all --- Reason --- ROM; RC-buggy; dead upstream -- Note that the package(s)

Bug#678182: marked as done (mixxx: FTBFS in Ubuntu (gcc 4.7))

2012-06-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 20 Jun 2012 09:13:57 + with message-id and subject line Bug#678182: fixed in mixxx 1.10.0~dfsg0-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #678182, regarding mixxx: FTBFS in Ubuntu (gcc 4.7) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

mixxx_1.10.0~dfsg0-5_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2012-06-20 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: mixxx-data_1.10.0~dfsg0-5_all.deb to main/m/mixxx/mixxx-data_1.10.0~dfsg0-5_all.deb mixxx_1.10.0~dfsg0-5.debian.tar.gz to main/m/mixxx/mixxx_1.10.0~dfsg0-5.debian.tar.gz mixxx_1.10.0~dfsg0-5.dsc to main/m/mixxx/mixxx_1.10.0~dfsg0-5.dsc mixxx_1.10.0~dfsg0-5_amd64.deb to main/m/m

Bug#665974: Diff between the two libmpc_0.1~r459-X.debian.tar.gz files

2012-06-20 Thread Han Boetes
With "CFLAGS=-g -O2 -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -Wformat -Werror=format-security" it fails and with "CFLAGS=-g -O2" it works fine indeed. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org ht

Is libav feature-complete?

2012-06-20 Thread Fabian Greffrath
Hi team, just unteil yesterday, when Irebuilt libav several times to check the cond_enable() macros, I believed the libav packages we ship were feature-complete - at least in its -extra flavour. However, there are still a handfull of "no" messages emerged by the configure script. Just out of

Bug#665974: Diff between the two libmpc_0.1~r459-X.debian.tar.gz files

2012-06-20 Thread Fabian Greffrath
Am 20.06.2012 10:09, schrieb Han Boetes: Most certainly. With only the CFLAGS cleared the library still works, just like you suspected. So it seems to choke on the stack-protector... ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-mainta

Bug#665974: Diff between the two libmpc_0.1~r459-X.debian.tar.gz files

2012-06-20 Thread Han Boetes
On 20-06-12 09:14, Fabian Greffrath wrote: > Am 19.06.2012 17:57, schrieb Han Boetes: > Alright. Since I consider CPPFLAGS and LDFLAGS quite harmless, could you > please leave them as they are and rebuild another time with only CFLAGS > reset to an empty string? Most certainly. With only the CFLAG

Processing of mixxx_1.10.0~dfsg0-5_amd64.changes

2012-06-20 Thread Debian FTP Masters
mixxx_1.10.0~dfsg0-5_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: mixxx_1.10.0~dfsg0-5.dsc mixxx_1.10.0~dfsg0-5.debian.tar.gz mixxx_1.10.0~dfsg0-5_amd64.deb mixxx-data_1.10.0~dfsg0-5_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debi

Processed: tagging 678182, severity of 678182 is wishlist

2012-06-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 678182 + pending Bug #678182 [mixxx] mixxx: FTBFS in Ubuntu (gcc 4.7) Added tag(s) pending. > severity 678182 wishlist Bug #678182 [mixxx] mixxx: FTBFS in Ubuntu (gcc 4.7) Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'normal' > thanks Stopping processing

Re: Bootstrapping libav on a new architecture

2012-06-20 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Fabian Greffrath dixit: >> Great, so a bootstrap libav should be decently easy. > > Yep, from the next upload on it is. Ok, thanks a lot. I’m still working on other packages like pygtk, so no need to hurry for me. bye, //mirabilos -- FWIW, I'm quite impressed with mksh interactively. I thought

Bug#665974: Diff between the two libmpc_0.1~r459-X.debian.tar.gz files

2012-06-20 Thread Fabian Greffrath
Am 19.06.2012 17:57, schrieb Han Boetes: That is exactly the difference between a working and a non-working binary. You're on the right track. Alright. Since I consider CPPFLAGS and LDFLAGS quite harmless, could you please leave them as they are and rebuild another time with only CFLAGS reset

Re: Bootstrapping libav on a new architecture

2012-06-20 Thread Fabian Greffrath
Am 19.06.2012 18:46, schrieb Thorsten Glaser: Ah, we’re really getting things like that? Nice! It is a proposed extension to the debian/control file that is not yet accepted AFAICT. This is why I put it in README.source and not directly in debian/control. Great, so a bootstrap libav should