Am 24.06.2012 11:15, schrieb Alessio Treglia:
Very good, I suppose we can adopt it as is and I think we don't need any
kind of licensing, a small "Originally written by" note is enough, isn't it?
Agreed, this is the best I've seen so far. I have just added it to the
wiki page as another altern
Hello,
Am 24.06.2012 12:03, schrieb Dukalskiy, Viacheslav:
I can’t replace ffmpeg with libav, the error is “libav-tools: trying
tooverwrite '/usr/bin/qt-faststart', which is also in package ffmpeg…”
The error looks the same as
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=655917 which is
sup
2012/6/25 Felipe Sateler :
> On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 7:13 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> On 12-06-24 at 06:23pm, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>>> On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>>> > On 12-06-24 at 06:14pm, fsate...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote:
>>> >> We are using a + for
On 12-06-24 at 08:06pm, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 7:13 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > On 12-06-24 at 06:23pm, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> >> On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Jonas Smedegaard
> >> wrote:
> >> > On 12-06-24 at 06:14pm, fsate...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote:
> >
I was using some patched version from deb-multimedia.org indeed.
Removing it manually of course is a workaround, but the system I am
developing requires smooth upgrades from previous versions.
(BTW, I have to learn how to report bugs and where, maybe you have
some links with the instructions?)
Am 25.06.2012 09:45, schrieb Dukalskiy, Viacheslav:
I was using some patched version from deb-multimedia.org indeed.
Removing it manually of course is a workaround, but the system I am
developing requires smooth upgrades from previous versions.
Fine, but we cannot provide smooth upgrades when p
2012/6/25 Jonas Smedegaard :
> On 12-06-24 at 08:06pm, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 7:13 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> > On 12-06-24 at 06:23pm, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> >> On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Jonas Smedegaard
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > On 12-06-24 at 06:14pm, fsate...
On 12-06-25 at 09:17am, Dan S wrote:
> 2012/6/25 Jonas Smedegaard :
> > On 12-06-24 at 08:06pm, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> >> On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 7:13 PM, Jonas Smedegaard
> >> wrote:
> >> > On 12-06-24 at 06:23pm, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> >> >> On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Jonas Smedegaard
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 5:24 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On 12-06-25 at 09:17am, Dan S wrote:
>> One question: if a package "foo-6.4" was released un-stripped, and
>> then later was stripped for DFSG reasons, it would have to be
>> "foo-6.4+dfsg" rather than "foo-6.4~dfsg" wouldn't it? I guess t
Am 20.06.2012 16:36, schrieb Reinhard Tartler:
Probably, but as you say, we would first need libxavs in debian main.
I'd leave packaging this as exercise for our less experienced team
members.
I've had a brief look at this and am not sure if it's suitable for
less experienced members. It seems
LÅN ERBJUDANDE @ 3% ränta gäller nu___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
ardour_2.8.12+svn12923-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
ardour_2.8.12+svn12923-1.dsc
ardour_2.8.12+svn12923.orig.tar.bz2
ardour_2.8.12+svn12923-1.debian.tar.gz
ardour_2.8.12+svn12923-1_amd64.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running o
Accepted:
ardour_2.8.12+svn12923-1.debian.tar.gz
to main/a/ardour/ardour_2.8.12+svn12923-1.debian.tar.gz
ardour_2.8.12+svn12923-1.dsc
to main/a/ardour/ardour_2.8.12+svn12923-1.dsc
ardour_2.8.12+svn12923-1_amd64.deb
to main/a/ardour/ardour_2.8.12+svn12923-1_amd64.deb
ardour_2.8.12+svn12923.
Your message dated Mon, 25 Jun 2012 16:02:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#678151: fixed in ardour 1:2.8.12+svn12923-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #678151,
regarding ardour: segfaults on inserting an lv2 plugin
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
package: libavutil51
version: 6:0.8.3-1+b1
severity: important
user: multiarch-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
usertags: multiarch
Hi,
The libav package just got a binnmu, which broke multi-arch
co-installability (since the changelog files differ between
architectures):
dpkg: error processing
/var
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 6:08 PM, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> package: libavutil51
> version: 6:0.8.3-1+b1
> severity: important
> user: multiarch-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
> usertags: multiarch
>
> Hi,
>
> The libav package just got a binnmu, which broke multi-arch
> co-installability (since the
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 18:38:37 +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> Debian-release, are you OK with a new upload to fix this?
>
No objection.
> How can we avoid this problem in the future?
>
Fix dpkg/sbuild.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
__
Hi Loïc,
Can you perhaps have a look at this bugreport? Either the dynamic
loader is doing something wrong here on armel, or the libavcodec
baseline shared library builds do enable armv7 instructions after all.
AFAIUI, this does not only affect the dreamplug but also the (supposly
popular) raspbe
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package mhwaveedit
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
# remote status report for #628653 (http://bugs.debian.org/628653)
# Bug title: mhwaveedit: cannot position cu
FYI: The status of the lv2file source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 0.82-1
Current version: 0.83-1
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
l
FYI: The status of the pd-osc source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 0.1-1
Current version: 0.1-2
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
late
FYI: The status of the lilv source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 0.14.2~dfsg0-3
Current version: 0.14.2~dfsg0-4
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you w
FYI: The status of the gmerlin source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1.0.0~dfsg-13
Current version: 1.2.0~dfsg-2
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you w
FYI: The status of the gmerlin-avdecoder source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1.1.0~dfsg-3
Current version: 1.2.0~dfsg-1
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a
FYI: The status of the gmerlin-encoders source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1.0.0-4
Current version: 1.2.0-2
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you wil
Hello to all multimedia maintainers
Benjamin Drung and I are wondering if we should maintain the xmms2
debian package under the debian multimedia team.
xmms2 is one source package and 60+ binary package, it is a
Client/server based media player system that play all common audio
formats.
So what
Sure
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> Hi Loïc,
>
> Can you perhaps have a look at this bugreport? Either the dynamic
> loader is doing something wrong here on armel, or the libavcodec
> baseline shared library builds do enable armv7 instructions after all.
>
> AFAIUI, this does no
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 9:19 PM, Loïc Minier wrote:
> tag 657885 + pending confirmed
> stop
>
> It seems the various "make install" runs for each flavour overwrite each
> other's binaries so that in the end the neon binaries like
> /usr/bin/ffmpeg get installed instead of the flavour-independent
>
tag 657885 + pending confirmed
stop
It seems the various "make install" runs for each flavour overwrite each
other's binaries so that in the end the neon binaries like
/usr/bin/ffmpeg get installed instead of the flavour-independent
binaries.
Fix committed in git, trying to prepare an upload.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # same issue
> forcemerge 657885 678186
Bug #657885 [ffmpeg] ffmpeg: Illegal instruction on dreamplug (arm cpu)
Bug #678186 [ffmpeg] /usr/bin/ffserver: Important bug for ARM : "Illegal
Instruction" error
Marked as found in versions libav/4:0.8-1.
Probably you are the uploader of the following file(s) in
the Debian upload queue directory:
libav_0.8.3-2.debian.tar.gz
libav_0.8.3-2.dsc
This looks like an upload, but a .changes file is missing, so the job
cannot be processed.
If no .changes file arrives within 23:26:05, the files will be d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2012-06-25 02:58, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 2:25 PM, IOhannes m zmoelnig
> wrote:
>> pd-iemnet: - pushed standards - fixed build-depends and depends -
>> updated debian/changelog to the final DEP-5 format - enabled
>> hardenin
pd-arraysize_0.1-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
pd-arraysize_0.1-1.dsc
pd-arraysize_0.1.orig.tar.gz
pd-arraysize_0.1-1.debian.tar.gz
pd-arraysize_0.1-1_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
__
libav_0.8.3-3_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
libav_0.8.3-3.dsc
libav_0.8.3-3.debian.tar.gz
libav-tools_0.8.3-3_amd64.deb
ffmpeg_0.8.3-3_amd64.deb
ffmpeg-dbg_0.8.3-3_amd64.deb
libav-dbg_0.8.3-3_amd64.deb
libav-regular-dbg_0.8.3-3_amd64.deb
liba
Hey all,
I'm now officially a DD with upload privileges! I just tried them out,
uploading two simple packages that I had sitting around ready to go.
Thanks all for your help getting me there.
I have a little bit of time to do some uploads if there is anything
urgent that needs to make it into
Accepted:
ffmpeg-dbg_0.8.3-3_amd64.deb
to main/liba/libav/ffmpeg-dbg_0.8.3-3_amd64.deb
ffmpeg-doc_0.8.3-3_all.deb
to main/liba/libav/ffmpeg-doc_0.8.3-3_all.deb
ffmpeg_0.8.3-3_amd64.deb
to main/liba/libav/ffmpeg_0.8.3-3_amd64.deb
libav-dbg_0.8.3-3_amd64.deb
to main/liba/libav/libav-dbg_0.
On 12-06-25 at 04:32pm, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> I'm now officially a DD with upload privileges! I just tried them
> out, uploading two simple packages that I had sitting around ready to
> go. Thanks all for your help getting me there.
>
> I have a little bit of time to do some uploads i
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
>
> Hey all,
>
> I'm now officially a DD with upload privileges! I just tried them out,
> uploading two simple packages that I had sitting around ready to go. Thanks
> all for your help getting me there.
Congrats!
>
> I have a li
(new) pd-arraysize_0.1-1.debian.tar.gz optional sound
(new) pd-arraysize_0.1-1.dsc optional sound
(new) pd-arraysize_0.1-1_i386.deb optional sound
Pd object to report the size of an array
This provides a simple object for Pure Data that reports the size of an array
by name. For historical reasons
Your message dated Mon, 25 Jun 2012 21:10:19 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#657885: fixed in libav 6:0.8.3-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #657885,
regarding ffmpeg: Illegal instruction on dreamplug (arm cpu)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Mon, 25 Jun 2012 21:10:19 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#657885: fixed in libav 6:0.8.3-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #657885,
regarding /usr/bin/ffserver: Important bug for ARM : "Illegal Instruction" error
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
pd-vbap_1.0.3.2-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
pd-vbap_1.0.3.2-1.dsc
pd-vbap_1.0.3.2.orig.tar.gz
pd-vbap_1.0.3.2-1.debian.tar.gz
pd-vbap_1.0.3.2-1_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
___
Accepted:
pd-vbap_1.0.3.2-1.debian.tar.gz
to main/p/pd-vbap/pd-vbap_1.0.3.2-1.debian.tar.gz
pd-vbap_1.0.3.2-1.dsc
to main/p/pd-vbap/pd-vbap_1.0.3.2-1.dsc
pd-vbap_1.0.3.2-1_i386.deb
to main/p/pd-vbap/pd-vbap_1.0.3.2-1_i386.deb
pd-vbap_1.0.3.2.orig.tar.gz
to main/p/pd-vbap/pd-vbap_1.0.3.2.
Hi, I just wanted to introduce myself. I'm Adam Thomas-Murphy and I was
recently added to the group. I'm working to get my package bdsup2sub++, a
port of the Java program BDSup2Sub (link here:
http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?t=145277), packaged and integrated
into Debian.I've been talking
pd-wiimote_0.3.2-2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
pd-wiimote_0.3.2-2.dsc
pd-wiimote_0.3.2.orig.tar.gz
pd-wiimote_0.3.2-2.debian.tar.gz
pd-wiimote_0.3.2-2_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
__
Package: mplayer2
Version: 2.0-554-gf63dbad-1+b1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
mplayer outputs some gnome-keyring warning to stderr (see below) when launched
from the X terminal (I experience it using LXTerminal and XTerm).
Executing mplayer from the text terminal gives no warnings.
---
$ mpl
On 12-06-25 at 05:13pm, Adam T wrote:
> Hi, I just wanted to introduce myself. I'm Adam Thomas-Murphy and I
> was recently added to the group. I'm working to get my package
> bdsup2sub++, a port of the Java program BDSup2Sub (link here:
> http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?t=145277), packaged
Warnings:
ignoring pd-wiimote_0.3.2.orig.tar.gz, since it's already in the archive.
Accepted:
pd-wiimote_0.3.2-2.debian.tar.gz
to main/p/pd-wiimote/pd-wiimote_0.3.2-2.debian.tar.gz
pd-wiimote_0.3.2-2.dsc
to main/p/pd-wiimote/pd-wiimote_0.3.2-2.dsc
pd-wiimote_0.3.2-2_i386.deb
to main/p/pd-
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
pd-wiimote_0.3.2-2_i386.deb: package says priority is extra, override says
optional.
Please note that a list of new sections were recently added to the
archive: cli-mono, database, debug
Your message dated Tue, 26 Jun 2012 08:18:31 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Fwd: libav_0.8.3-3_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #678997,
regarding libavutil51: binnmu broke multiarch co-installability
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim th
Hi Rémi!
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 7:02 PM, Rémi Vanicat wrote:
> So what should we do if we want the package in this team?
It would be enough to move your Git repositories from pkg-xmms2 into
pkg-multimedia.
--
Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com
Debian Developer | ales...
51 matches
Mail list logo
